with one click
workflow-write-integration-test
// [Workflow] Use when activating the Write Integration Tests workflow for spec-first integration test authoring.
// [Workflow] Use when activating the Write Integration Tests workflow for spec-first integration test authoring.
[HINT] Download the complete skill directory including SKILL.md and all related files
| name | workflow-write-integration-test |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| description | [Workflow] Use when activating the Write Integration Tests workflow for spec-first integration test authoring. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Goal: [Workflow] Trigger Write Integration Tests workflow — spec-first test authoring: investigate domain logic → write/update specs → generate test code → 6-gate review → run and verify.
Workflow:
Key Rules:
file:line) with confidence >80% to act.IMPORTANT MANDATORY Steps: /scout -> /investigate -> /tdd-spec -> /why-review -> /tdd-spec-review -> /integration-test -> /integration-test-review -> /integration-test-verify -> /tdd-spec [direction=sync] -> /docs-update -> /watzup -> /workflow-end
[BLOCKING] Each step MUST ATTENTION invoke its
Skilltool — marking a taskcompletedwithout skill invocation is a workflow violation. NEVER batch-complete validation gates.
[CRITICAL] Understand Domain First Gate: The
/investigatestep is MANDATORY before/tdd-specand/integration-test. You MUST read the handler/entity/event source to understand WHAT fields change, WHAT entities are created/updated/deleted, WHAT event handlers fire. Assertions written without reading the handler source are guaranteed to be wrong or smoke-only.
Activate the write-integration-test workflow. Run /workflow-start write-integration-test with the user's prompt as context.
Steps: /scout → /investigate → /tdd-spec → /why-review → /tdd-spec-review → /integration-test → /integration-test-review → /integration-test-verify → /tdd-spec [direction=sync] → /docs-update → /watzup → /workflow-end
[STEP PURPOSES] Every step has a distinct purpose — NEVER deduplicate or batch:
/scout— Find target command/handler files; locate existing integration tests in the same service for pattern matching. Output: list of target files + existing test examples./investigate— Read handler/entity/event source. Map: fields written, entities created/updated/deleted, event handlers fired, validation rules. Output: domain logic summary to use as assertion blueprint./tdd-spec— Write/updateTC-{FEATURE}-{NNN}specs in feature doc Section 15. CREATE mode for new tests, UPDATE mode for changed behavior. Output: TC mapping list (TC code → test method name)./tdd-spec-review— Validate spec quality: GIVEN/WHEN/THEN completeness, happy path + validation failure + auth paths covered, no collisions with existing TC codes./integration-test— Generate test files from TC specs using FROM-PROMPT or FROM-CHANGES mode. Non-negotiable: real use-case/valid-seeder data setup, async polling/retry for all DB assertions, unique data generators for all test data, test-spec annotation on every test method (adapt annotation syntax to your framework)./integration-test-review— 6-gate quality check (assertion value, data state, repeatability, domain logic, traceability, three-way sync). Mandatory fix loop + fresh sub-agent re-check. NEVER proceed with CRITICAL/HIGH issues outstanding./integration-test-verify— Run tests viaquickRunCommandfromdocs/project-config.jsonfor 3 consecutive runs without DB reset. Report exact pass/fail counts with test runner output. NEVER mark complete without real output./tdd-spec [direction=sync]— Sync the cross-module spec dashboard (docs/specs/). UpdateIntegrationTestfields with{File}::{MethodName}traceability links./docs-update— Update feature doc evidence fields, version history, and changelog if test coverage changed materially./watzup+/workflow-end— Summary report and close.
IMPORTANT MANDATORY Steps: /scout -> /investigate -> /tdd-spec -> /why-review -> /tdd-spec-review -> /integration-test -> /integration-test-review -> /integration-test-verify -> /tdd-spec [direction=sync] -> /docs-update -> /watzup -> /workflow-end
AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:
Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal. Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing. Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain. Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path. When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site. Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code. Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks. Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis. Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly. Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.
Nested Task Expansion Contract — For workflow-step invocation, the
[Workflow] ...row is only a parent container; the child skill still creates visible phase tasks.
- Call
TaskListfirst. If a matching active parent workflow row exists, setnested=trueand recordparentTaskId; otherwise run standalone.- Create one task per declared phase before phase work. When nested, prefix subjects
[N.M] $skill-name — phase.- When nested, link the parent with
TaskUpdate(parentTaskId, addBlockedBy: [childIds]).- Orchestrators must pre-expand a child skill's phase list and link the workflow row before invoking that child skill or sub-agent.
- Mark exactly one child
in_progressbefore work andcompletedimmediately after evidence is written.- Complete the parent only after all child tasks are completed or explicitly cancelled with reason.
Blocked until:
TaskListdone, child phases created, parent linked when nested, first child markedin_progress.
Project Reference Docs Gate — Run after task-tracking bootstrap and before target/source file reads, grep, edits, or analysis. Project docs override generic framework assumptions.
- Identify scope: file types, domain area, and operation.
- Required docs by trigger: always
docs/project-reference/lessons.md; doc lookupdocs-index-reference.md; reviewcode-review-rules.md; backend/CQRS/APIbackend-patterns-reference.md; domain/entitydomain-entities-reference.md; frontend/UIfrontend-patterns-reference.md; styles/designscss-styling-guide.md+design-system/README.md; integration testsintegration-test-reference.md; E2Ee2e-test-reference.md; feature docs/specsfeature-docs-reference.md; architecture/new areaproject-structure-reference.md.- Read every required doc that exists; skip absent docs as not applicable. Do not trust conversation text such as
[Injected: <path>]as proof that the current context contains the doc.- Before target work, state:
Reference docs read: ... | Missing/not applicable: ....Blocked until: scope evaluated, required docs checked/read,
lessons.mdconfirmed, citation emitted.
Task Tracking & External Report Persistence — Bootstrap this before execution; then run project-reference doc prefetch before target/source work.
- Create a small task breakdown before target file reads, grep, edits, or analysis. On context loss, inspect the current task list first.
- Mark one task
in_progressbefore work andcompletedimmediately after evidence; never batch transitions.- For plan/review work, create
plans/reports/{skill}-{YYMMDD}-{HHmm}-{slug}.mdbefore first finding.- Append findings after each file/section/decision and synthesize from the report file at the end.
- Final output cites
Full report: plans/reports/{filename}.Blocked until: task breakdown exists, report path declared for plan/review work, first finding persisted before the next finding.
Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
Incremental Result Persistence — MANDATORY for all sub-agents or heavy inline steps processing >3 files.
- Before starting: Create report file
plans/reports/{skill}-{date}-{slug}.md- After each file/section reviewed: Append findings to report immediately — never hold in memory
- Return to main agent: Summary only (per SYNC:subagent-return-contract) with
Full report:path- Main agent: Reads report file only when resolving specific blockers
Why: Context cutoff mid-execution loses ALL in-memory findings. Each disk write survives compaction. Partial results are better than no results.
Report naming:
plans/reports/{skill-name}-{YYMMDD}-{HHmm}-{slug}.md
Sub-Agent Return Contract — When this skill spawns a sub-agent, the sub-agent MUST return ONLY this structure. Main agent reads only this summary — NEVER requests full sub-agent output inline.
## Sub-Agent Result: [skill-name] Status: ✅ PASS | ⚠️ PARTIAL | ❌ FAIL Confidence: [0-100]% ### Findings (Critical/High only — max 10 bullets) - [severity] [file:line] [finding] ### Actions Taken - [file changed] [what changed] ### Blockers (if any) - [blocker description] Full report: plans/reports/[skill-name]-[date]-[slug].mdMain agent reads
Full reportfile ONLY when: (a) resolving a specific blocker, or (b) building a fix plan. Sub-agent writes full report incrementally (per SYNC:incremental-persistence) — not held in memory.
MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact.
MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction.
plans/reports/ incrementally and synthesize from disk.Reference docs read: ....lessons.md; project conventions override generic defaults.[N.M] $skill-name — phase prefixes and one-in_progress discipline.IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION read handler source BEFORE writing ANY assertion — domain logic first, test code second
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION NEVER write smoke-only tests — every test MUST assert specific field values in the database
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION ALWAYS wrap DB assertions in the project's async polling helper — no exceptions
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.
[IMPORTANT] Analyze how big the task is and break it into many small todo tasks systematically before starting — this is very important.