synthesizing

name	synthesizing
description	Use when generating PRISMA flowcharts and synthesis for systematic literature review. TRIGGERS: slr export, synthesize, PRISMA, generate report, synthesis, generate report, export review

Synthesizing

Generate PRISMA flowcharts and synthesis reports for systematic literature review.

Overview

Generate final synthesis including PRISMA flowchart, included/excluded paper tables, and export options.

Prerequisite: Screening must be complete (scimesh:screening). Optionally, extraction too (scimesh:extracting).

Generate Stats from Workspace

# Screening statistics
uvx scimesh workspace stats {review_path}/

Output:

Total papers: 120

  included:    31 (25.8%)
  excluded:    85 (70.8%)
  maybe:        4 (3.3%)
  unscreened:   0 (0.0%)

Progress: 100%

Generate PRISMA Flowchart

# Generate PRISMA synthesis with mermaid flowchart and tables
uvx scimesh workspace prisma {review_path}/ -o {review_path}/synthesis.md

This generates a complete synthesis document with:

• Mermaid PRISMA flowchart
• Summary statistics
• Included papers table
• Excluded papers table with reasons
• Protocol summary

Export Options

# Export included papers to BibTeX
uvx scimesh workspace export {review_path}/ --status included -f bibtex -o included.bib

# Export to RIS
uvx scimesh workspace export {review_path}/ --status included -f ris -o included.ris

# Export to CSV (spreadsheet-friendly)
uvx scimesh workspace export {review_path}/ -f csv -o all_papers.csv

# Export to JSON
uvx scimesh workspace export {review_path}/ --status included -f json -o included.json

# Export to YAML
uvx scimesh workspace export {review_path}/ -f yaml -o papers.yaml

Workspace CLI Reference

# Screening statistics
uvx scimesh workspace stats {review_path}/

# List papers (table format)
uvx scimesh workspace list {review_path}/

# List unscreened papers
uvx scimesh workspace list {review_path}/ --status unscreened

# List included papers
uvx scimesh workspace list {review_path}/ --status included

# Generate PRISMA synthesis
uvx scimesh workspace prisma {review_path}/ -o synthesis.md

Final Output Structure

{review_path}/
├── index.yaml          # Protocol + stats
├── searches.yaml       # Search history
├── papers.yaml         # Paper list with search_ids
├── synthesis.md        # PRISMA + synthesis (generated)
├── included.bib        # BibTeX of included papers
└── papers/
    └── {year}/             # Organized by publication year
        └── {paper-slug}/
            ├── index.yaml
            ├── fulltext.pdf
            └── condensed.md

Pre-Extraction Decision

Before writing a narrative synthesis, check how many included papers have extraction data (condensed.md files). Present this to the user:

{
    "question": "Extraction status: {extracted}/{included} papers have condensed.md. How to proceed?",
    "header": "Synthesis",
    "options": [
        {"label": "Synthesize now (Recommended)", "description": "Use available data (abstracts + any extractions)"},
        {"label": "Extract first", "description": "Run scimesh:extracting before synthesis"},
        {"label": "PRISMA only", "description": "Generate PRISMA flowchart without narrative synthesis"}
    ],
    "multiSelect": False
}

To count extraction status, check each included paper directory for a condensed.md file:

# List included papers
uvx scimesh workspace list {review_path}/ --status included

Then use Glob to check which of those paper directories contain condensed.md:

Glob(pattern="{review_path}/papers/**/condensed.md")

Synthesis Workflow

After PRISMA generation, write a narrative synthesis that ties the included papers together. The approach depends on whether extraction was done.

When extraction WAS done (condensed.md exists)

1. Read all condensed.md files from included papers. Each contains structured summaries of the paper's problem, method, results, and limitations.
2. Identify themes across papers. Group by:
   • Research question or problem addressed
   • Methodology (e.g., experimental vs. observational, simulation vs. analytical)
   • Domain or application area
   • Chronological development of the field
3. Write thematic sections (minimum 3). Each section should:
   • Open with the theme and why it matters
   • Discuss papers that contribute to this theme, citing them by author/year
   • Compare and contrast findings across papers within the theme
   • Note where papers agree, disagree, or leave gaps
4. Write a cross-cutting discussion that connects themes and identifies the overall state of knowledge.

When extraction was NOT done (abstracts only)

1. Read index.yaml for each included paper. Use the title, abstract, year, and any screening notes fields.
2. Identify themes from abstracts alone. Grouping will be coarser:
   • Broad topic or research area
   • Type of contribution (theoretical, empirical, review, tool/framework)
   • Recency (older foundational work vs. recent developments)
3. Write thematic sections (minimum 3). Each section should:
   • Summarize what the group of papers addresses based on abstracts
   • Cite papers by author/year
   • Acknowledge that depth is limited without full-text extraction
4. Flag papers where the abstract alone is insufficient to place them confidently in a theme.

Narrative structure template

Use this structure for the narrative synthesis section appended to synthesis.md:

## Narrative Synthesis

### Overview
Brief paragraph summarizing the scope: how many papers, what time period, what broad questions they address.

### Theme 1: {Descriptive Theme Name}
Discussion of papers in this theme. Every claim cites at least one paper.
Compare and contrast findings. Note agreements and contradictions.

### Theme 2: {Descriptive Theme Name}
...

### Theme 3: {Descriptive Theme Name}
...

### Cross-Cutting Discussion
How do the themes relate? What is the overall trajectory of the field?
Where do findings converge or diverge across themes?

### Gaps and Limitations
What questions remain unanswered? What methodological limitations are common?
What populations, domains, or conditions are underrepresented?

Do NOT just list papers sequentially. The synthesis must be organized by themes, not by paper.

Quality Criteria

The narrative synthesis must meet ALL of the following criteria:

1. Every claim must cite at least one paper. Do not make unsupported assertions. Use (Author, Year) format consistently.
2. Include contradictions and disagreements. If two papers reach different conclusions, say so explicitly. Do not smooth over conflicts in the literature.
3. Note limitations of the evidence base. Are most studies small-scale? Is there geographic or methodological bias? Are there publication bias concerns?
4. Provide concrete numbers and metrics when available. Instead of "the method improved performance," write "the method improved accuracy by 12% (Author, 2023)." Pull specific values from condensed.md or abstracts.
5. Minimum 3 thematic sections. If the included papers span fewer than 3 clear themes, discuss methodological variation or chronological development as additional dimensions.
6. No orphan papers. Every included paper must appear in at least one thematic section. If a paper does not fit any theme, create a "Other Contributions" section rather than omitting it.
7. Balanced coverage. Do not devote 80% of the synthesis to one paper. Aim for roughly proportional coverage across the included studies.

Ask Before Export Format

{
    "question": "How do you want to export the review?",
    "header": "Export",
    "options": [
        {"label": "Full synthesis (Rec)", "description": "PRISMA + tables + narrative"},
        {"label": "BibTeX only", "description": "Export citations for reference manager"},
        {"label": "CSV summary", "description": "Spreadsheet-friendly format"}
    ],
    "multiSelect": True
}