review-marathon-plan

name	review-marathon-plan
description	Step-by-step methodology for reviewing marathon plans for simulation readiness, covering route feasibility, logistics completeness, and safety clearance.

Review Marathon Plan

Purpose

Systematically review a marathon plan to determine if it is ready for simulation execution. This skill provides a structured review methodology covering route feasibility, logistics completeness, and safety clearance.

Procedure

Step 1: Route Feasibility Assessment

1. Verify the route distance is exactly 26.2 miles (42.195 km)
2. Check that waypoints are geographically plausible and form a connected path
3. Confirm start and finish locations are specified with adequate capacity
4. Assess elevation profile suitability for the event type
5. Verify the route passes through the landmarks/areas specified in requirements

Score: Rate route feasibility as feasible, marginal, or infeasible

Step 2: Logistics Completeness Check

Use the check_plan_readiness tool to perform automated checks, then review:

1. Water stations: At least 20 for a full marathon (every 1-2 miles)
2. Medical tents: Positioned at key intervals and high-risk areas
3. Timing systems: Chip timing, mats, and tracking specified
4. Course marshals: Sufficient count for route length and complexity
5. Start/finish infrastructure: Corrals, stages, post-race amenities
6. Equipment lists: Barriers, signage, communication systems

Score: Rate logistics as ready, partial, or not_ready

Step 3: Safety Clearance Review

1. Emergency vehicle access: Can ambulances reach any point on the route?
2. Hospital access: Are nearby hospitals accessible during the event?
3. Fire station access: Are fire stations accessible or detoured?
4. Evacuation routes: Are evacuation routes documented?
5. Crowd management: Is the plan adequate for expected participant count?
6. Weather contingency: Is there a plan for adverse weather?

Score: Rate safety as cleared, conditional, or blocked

Step 4: Compile Approval Decision

1. Calculate overall_readiness as weighted average:
   • Route feasibility: 30%
   • Logistics readiness: 40%
   • Safety clearance: 30%
2. Identify blockers (critical issues that prevent approval)
3. Identify recommendations (non-critical improvements)
4. Set approved based on: no blockers AND overall_readiness >= 0.85