bio-workflows-neoantigen-pipeline

name	bio-workflows-neoantigen-pipeline
description	End-to-end neoantigen discovery from somatic variants to ranked vaccine candidates. Integrates HLA typing, MHC binding prediction, pVACtools neoantigen calling, and immunogenicity scoring. Use when identifying tumor neoantigens for personalized vaccine design or checkpoint biomarkers.
tool_type	mixed
primary_tool	pVACtools
workflow	true
depends_on	["clinical-databases/hla-typing","immunoinformatics/mhc-binding-prediction","immunoinformatics/mhc-class-ii-prediction","immunoinformatics/neoantigen-prediction","immunoinformatics/immunogenicity-scoring","immunoinformatics/epitope-prediction"]
qc_checkpoints	[{"after_hla":"HLA types resolved to 4-digit, coverage adequate"},{"after_binding":"Predictions generated for all alleles, IC50 <500nM filter"},{"after_neoantigen":"Neoantigens identified with VAF >0.1, expressed"},{"after_scoring":"Top candidates prioritized by immunogenicity"}]

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: Ensembl VEP 111+, MHCflurry 2.1+, OptiType 1.3+, matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, pVACtools 4.1+, pandas 2.2+, seaborn 0.13+

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

• Python: pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures
• CLI: <tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flags

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

Neoantigen Pipeline

"Predict neoantigens from my tumor sequencing data" -> Orchestrate HLA typing (OptiType), somatic variant calling, pVACtools neoantigen prediction, MHC binding scoring, and immunogenicity-based candidate ranking for personalized cancer immunotherapy.

Complete workflow from somatic variants to ranked neoantigen vaccine candidates for personalized cancer immunotherapy.

Key Judgment -- binding is the easy part; PPV lives downstream

A binding-only pipeline has single-digit-percent positive predictive value (TESLA; Wells 2020 Cell 183:818). The load-bearing steps are downstream of binding: correct full-resolution HLA typing (wrong allele = confident garbage), HLA loss-of-heterozygosity (run LOHHLA and DROP candidates on a lost allele — it invalidates predictions silently), proximal-variant phasing (supply --phased-proximal-variants-vcf or the mutant peptide is wrong), cancer cell fraction for clonality (clonal beats subclonal; use purity + copy number, not raw VAF), expression, and quality features (agretopicity, foreignness). Treat the ranked output as a tier-1 hypothesis list for immunopeptidomics MS and functional T-cell validation, not a final answer. Add MHC class II (CD4) neoantigens for vaccine help (see immunoinformatics/mhc-class-ii-prediction). Note on DAI below: agretopicity is most often the WT/MT binding ratio; whichever form is used, an anchor-position mutation inflates it without changing the TCR-facing surface, and a barely-presented WT makes it unstable — pair it with anchor evaluation.

Workflow Overview

Somatic VCF (annotated) + Tumor RNA-seq (optional)
        |
        v
[1. HLA Typing] --> arcasHLA / OptiType (if types not provided)
        |
        v
[2. MHC Binding Prediction] --> MHCflurry / NetMHCpan
        |
        v
[3. Neoantigen Calling] --> pVACseq
        |
        v
[4. Immunogenicity Scoring] --> Multi-factor ranking
        |
        v
Ranked Vaccine Candidates (TSV + visualizations)

Prerequisites (Ensembl VEP 111+)

pip install pvactools mhcflurry vatools

mhcflurry-downloads fetch

conda install -c bioconda vep arcashla optitype

Primary Path: pVACseq Pipeline

Step 1: HLA Typing (if not provided)

HLA types are critical for MHC binding prediction. If not already known from clinical testing:

# From tumor RNA-seq BAM
arcasHLA extract tumor.bam -t 8 -o hla_output/
arcasHLA genotype hla_output/tumor.extracted.1.fq.gz hla_output/tumor.extracted.2.fq.gz \
    -g A,B,C,DRB1,DQB1,DPB1 -t 8 -o hla_output/

# Parse results
cat hla_output/tumor.genotype.json

import json

with open('hla_output/tumor.genotype.json') as f:
    hla_data = json.load(f)

hla_alleles = []
for gene, alleles in hla_data.items():
    for allele in alleles:
        hla_alleles.append(f'HLA-{allele}')

# Format for pVACseq: HLA-A*02:01,HLA-A*24:02,HLA-B*07:02,...
hla_string = ','.join(hla_alleles)
print(f'HLA alleles: {hla_string}')

Step 2: VCF Annotation with VEP

pVACseq requires VEP-annotated VCF with specific fields:

# Annotate somatic VCF
vep --input_file somatic.vcf \
    --output_file somatic.vep.vcf \
    --format vcf --vcf --symbol --terms SO \
    --plugin Frameshift --plugin Wildtype \
    --offline --cache \
    --pick --fork 4

# Add expression data (optional but recommended)
# Positionals: <vcf> <expression_file> {kallisto,stringtie,cufflinks,custom} {gene,transcript}
vcf-expression-annotator somatic.vep.vcf \
    expression.tsv custom gene \
    -s tumor_sample --id-column gene_id --expression-column tpm \
    -o somatic.vep.expression.vcf

Step 3: Run pVACseq (Ensembl VEP 111+)

# Basic run with MHC Class I
pvacseq run \
    somatic.vep.vcf \
    tumor_sample \
    "HLA-A*02:01,HLA-A*24:02,HLA-B*07:02,HLA-B*44:02,HLA-C*07:02,HLA-C*05:01" \
    MHCflurry MHCnuggetsI NetMHCpan \
    pvacseq_output/ \
    -e1 8,9,10,11 \
    --iedb-install-directory /path/to/iedb \
    -t 8

# With expression filtering
pvacseq run \
    somatic.vep.expression.vcf \
    tumor_sample \
    "HLA-A*02:01,HLA-A*24:02,HLA-B*07:02,HLA-B*44:02" \
    MHCflurry NetMHCpan \
    pvacseq_output/ \
    -e1 8,9,10,11 \
    --tumor-purity 0.7 \
    --trna-vaf 0.1 \
    --expn-val 1 \
    -t 8

Step 4: Filter and Rank Candidates

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

results = pd.read_csv('pvacseq_output/MHC_Class_I/tumor_sample.filtered.tsv', sep='\t')

# Binding affinity filter (IC50 <500nM considered strong binder)
# IC50 <500nM: strong binder; 500-5000nM: weak binder
strong_binders = results[results['Median MT IC50 Score'] < 500].copy()

# Differential agretopicity index (DAI): difference between MT and WT binding
# Higher DAI = more tumor-specific
strong_binders['DAI'] = strong_binders['Median WT IC50 Score'] - strong_binders['Median MT IC50 Score']

# Expression filter (if available)
if 'Gene Expression' in strong_binders.columns:
    # TPM >1 ensures detectable expression
    strong_binders = strong_binders[strong_binders['Gene Expression'] > 1]

# VAF filter: prioritize clonal mutations
# VAF >0.1 ensures mutation present in substantial tumor fraction
strong_binders = strong_binders[strong_binders['Tumor DNA VAF'] > 0.1]

# Multi-factor scoring
def immunogenicity_score(row):
    score = 0
    # Strong binding (IC50 <150nM is very strong)
    if row['Median MT IC50 Score'] < 150:
        score += 3
    elif row['Median MT IC50 Score'] < 500:
        score += 2

    # High DAI (tumor-specificity)
    if row['DAI'] > 1000:
        score += 2
    elif row['DAI'] > 500:
        score += 1

    # Clonal mutation (high VAF)
    if row['Tumor DNA VAF'] > 0.3:
        score += 2
    elif row['Tumor DNA VAF'] > 0.15:
        score += 1

    # Expressed (if available)
    if 'Gene Expression' in row.index and row['Gene Expression'] > 10:
        score += 1

    return score

strong_binders['Immunogenicity Score'] = strong_binders.apply(immunogenicity_score, axis=1)

# Rank by composite score
ranked = strong_binders.sort_values('Immunogenicity Score', ascending=False)

# Top candidates for vaccine
top_candidates = ranked.head(20)
top_candidates.to_csv('top_neoantigen_candidates.tsv', sep='\t', index=False)

print(f'Total strong binders: {len(strong_binders)}')
print(f'Top 20 candidates exported')
print(ranked[['Gene Name', 'MT Epitope Seq', 'HLA Allele', 'Median MT IC50 Score', 'DAI', 'Immunogenicity Score']].head(10))

Step 5: MHC Class II Neoantigens (CD4+ T cell help)

pvacseq run \
    somatic.vep.vcf \
    tumor_sample \
    "DRB1*01:01,DRB1*07:01,DQB1*02:01,DQB1*03:01" \
    MHCnuggetsII NetMHCIIpan \
    pvacseq_class2_output/ \
    -e2 15 \
    --iedb-install-directory /path/to/iedb \
    -t 8

Alternative: Standalone MHCflurry

For quick binding predictions without full pVACseq pipeline:

from mhcflurry import Class1PresentationPredictor

predictor = Class1PresentationPredictor.load()

peptides = ['SIINFEKL', 'GILGFVFTL', 'NLVPMVATV']
alleles = ['HLA-A*02:01', 'HLA-B*07:02']

results = predictor.predict(peptides=peptides, alleles=alleles,
                            include_affinity_percentile=True, verbose=0)
print(results[['peptide', 'best_allele', 'presentation_score', 'affinity', 'affinity_percentile']])

Visualization

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns

fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(15, 5))

# IC50 distribution
ax1 = axes[0]
ax1.hist(ranked['Median MT IC50 Score'], bins=50, edgecolor='black')
ax1.axvline(500, color='red', linestyle='--', label='500nM threshold')
ax1.set_xlabel('Median MT IC50 (nM)')
ax1.set_ylabel('Count')
ax1.set_title('Binding Affinity Distribution')
ax1.legend()

# DAI vs IC50
ax2 = axes[1]
scatter = ax2.scatter(ranked['Median MT IC50 Score'], ranked['DAI'],
                      c=ranked['Immunogenicity Score'], cmap='viridis', alpha=0.7)
ax2.set_xlabel('MT IC50 (nM)')
ax2.set_ylabel('Differential Agretopicity Index')
ax2.set_title('Tumor Specificity vs Binding')
plt.colorbar(scatter, ax=ax2, label='Immunogenicity Score')

# Top genes
ax3 = axes[2]
gene_counts = ranked['Gene Name'].value_counts().head(15)
gene_counts.plot(kind='barh', ax=ax3)
ax3.set_xlabel('Number of Neoantigens')
ax3.set_title('Top Genes with Neoantigens')

plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('neoantigen_summary.pdf')

Parameter Recommendations

Step	Parameter	Value	Rationale
pVACseq	-e1	8,9,10,11	MHC-I binds 8-11mer peptides
pVACseq	-e2	15	MHC-II binds 13-25mer, 15 is core
Filtering	IC50	<500nM	Standard strong binder threshold
Filtering	VAF	>0.1	Ensures clonal representation
Filtering	Expression	>1 TPM	Detectable transcription
Ranking	DAI	>500	Good tumor specificity

Troubleshooting

Issue	Likely Cause	Solution
No neoantigens found	Low mutation burden	Lower IC50 threshold to 1000nM
Missing HLA alleles	Incomplete typing	Use OptiType with WES data
VEP annotation errors	Plugin missing	Install Frameshift, Wildtype plugins
Expression data mismatch	Sample naming	Verify sample IDs match between VCF and expression
Low DAI values	Germline contamination	Ensure proper somatic filtering

Output Files

File	Description
*.filtered.tsv	pVACseq filtered neoantigens
*.all_epitopes.tsv	All predicted epitopes
top_neoantigen_candidates.tsv	Ranked vaccine candidates
neoantigen_summary.pdf	Visualization figures

Related Skills

• immunoinformatics/mhc-binding-prediction - MHCflurry parameters; BA vs EL, %Rank vs nM, abundance bias
• immunoinformatics/mhc-class-ii-prediction - class II (CD4) neoantigens for vaccine help
• immunoinformatics/neoantigen-prediction - pVACtools details; LOHHLA, phasing, clonality
• immunoinformatics/immunogenicity-scoring - rank within patient (don't threshold); fitness-model quality
• immunoinformatics/epitope-prediction - B-cell epitopes
• clinical-databases/hla-typing - HLA typing (T1K is the 2024-2026 all-rounder; OptiType for class I; arcasHLA for RNA-seq); check HLA-LOH via LOHHLA / DASH which abolishes neoantigen presentation in ~17% pan-cancer (~30%+ HNSCC / NSCLC / cervical)
• clinical-databases/tumor-mutational-burden - TMB-H pan-tumor ICI biomarker; check before neoantigen-vaccine candidate selection
• clinical-databases/msi-detection - MSI-H / dMMR pan-tumor ICI biomarker; MSI-H supersedes TMB-H per Sha 2020
• clinical-databases/somatic-signatures - Clonal neoantigen burden (McGranahan 2016 Science) predicts ICI response better than total TMB
• workflows/somatic-variant-pipeline - Upstream somatic calling