with one click
with one click
Investigate a GitHub issue - fetch info, update labels, analyze code/reproduce, report findings, and optionally fix. Usage: /investigate-issue <issue-url-or-number>
GROWI main application (apps/app) specific commands and scripts. Auto-invoked when working in apps/app.
Auto-invoked when modifying page transition logic, global atom hydration, or the `[[...path]]` dynamic route. Explains the data flow from SSR/client navigation to page rendering, and the hydration-vs-subsequent-sync rule for global atoms (`currentPathnameAtom`, `currentUserAtom`, `isMaintenanceModeAtom`).
Organize and clean up specification documents after implementation completion. Removes implementation details while preserving essential context for future refactoring.
Initialize a new specification with detailed project description
GROWI apps/app Turbopack configuration, module optimization, and build measurement tooling. Auto-invoked when working in apps/app.
| name | kiro-spec-quick |
| description | Quick spec generation with interactive or automatic mode |
| allowed-tools | Read, Skill, Bash, Write, Glob, Agent |
| argument-hint | <project-description> [--auto] |
If --auto flag is present in $ARGUMENTS, you are in AUTOMATIC MODE.
In Automatic Mode:
Execute 4 spec phases sequentially. In automatic mode, execute all phases without stopping. In interactive mode, prompt user for approval between phases.
Before claiming quick generation is complete, run one lightweight sanity review over the generated requirements, design, and tasks. If the host supports fresh subagents, use one. Otherwise run the sanity review inline.
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
--auto: Automatic Mode (execute all 4 phases)--auto flag if present)Example:
"User profile with avatar upload --auto" → mode=automatic, description="User profile with avatar upload"
"User profile feature" → mode=interactive, description="User profile feature"
Display mode banner and proceed to Step 2.
Execute these 4 phases in order:
Core Logic:
Check for Brief:
.kiro/specs/{feature-name}/brief.md exists (created by /kiro-discovery), read it for discovery context (problem, approach, scope, constraints)$ARGUMENTSGenerate Feature Name:
Check Uniqueness:
.kiro/specs/*/brief.md (no spec.json), use that directory (discovery created it)-2, -3, etc.Create Directory:
mkdir -p .kiro/specs/{feature-name} (skip if already exists from discovery)Initialize Files from Templates:
a. Read templates:
- .kiro/settings/templates/specs/init.json
- .kiro/settings/templates/specs/requirements-init.md
b. Replace placeholders:
{{FEATURE_NAME}} → feature-name
{{TIMESTAMP}} → current ISO 8601 timestamp (use `date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ"`)
{{PROJECT_DESCRIPTION}} → description
en → language code (detect from user's input language, default to `en`)
c. Write files using Write tool:
- .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/spec.json
- .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/requirements.md
Output Progress: "Phase 1/4 complete: Spec initialized at .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/"
Automatic Mode: IMMEDIATELY continue to Phase 2.
Interactive Mode: Prompt "Continue to requirements generation? (yes/no)"
Invoke /kiro-spec-requirements {feature-name} via the Skill tool.
Wait for completion. IGNORE any "Next Step" message (it is for standalone usage).
Output Progress: "Phase 2/4 complete: Requirements generated"
Automatic Mode: IMMEDIATELY continue to Phase 3.
Interactive Mode: Prompt "Continue to design generation? (yes/no)"
Invoke /kiro-spec-design {feature-name} -y via the Skill tool. The -y flag auto-approves requirements.
Wait for completion. IGNORE any "Next Step" message.
Output Progress: "Phase 3/4 complete: Design generated"
Automatic Mode: IMMEDIATELY continue to Phase 4.
Interactive Mode: Prompt "Continue to tasks generation? (yes/no)"
Invoke /kiro-spec-tasks {feature-name} -y via the Skill tool.
Note: -y flag auto-approves requirements, design, and tasks.
Wait for completion.
Output Progress: "Phase 4/4 complete: Tasks generated"
After Phase 4, run a lightweight sanity review before claiming completion.
requirements.md, design.md, and tasks.md directly from disk. If brief.md exists, use it only as supporting context._Depends:_, _Boundary:_, and (P) markers plausible for implementation?tasks.md once, then re-run the sanity review.All 4 phases plus sanity review complete.
Output final completion summary (see Output Description section) and exit.
Interactive Mode:
Quick Spec Generation (Interactive Mode)
You will be prompted at each phase.
Note: Skips gap analysis and design validation.
Automatic Mode:
Quick Spec Generation (Automatic Mode)
All phases execute automatically without prompts.
Note: Skips optional validations (gap analysis, design review) and user approval prompts. Internal review gates still run.
Final sanity review still runs.
After each phase, show brief progress:
Spec initialized at .kiro/specs/{feature}/
Requirements generated → Continuing to design...
Design generated → Continuing to tasks...
Provide output in the language specified in spec.json:
Quick Spec Generation Complete!
Generated Files:
- specs/{feature}/spec.json
- specs/{feature}/requirements.md ({X} requirements)
- specs/{feature}/design.md ({Y} components, {Z} endpoints)
- specs/{feature}/tasks.md ({N} tasks)
Skipped: /kiro-validate-gap, /kiro-validate-design
Sanity review: PASSED | FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED
Next Steps:
1. Review generated specs (especially design.md)
2. Optional: `/kiro-validate-gap {feature}`, `/kiro-validate-design {feature}`
3. Start implementation: `/kiro-impl {feature}`
Template Missing:
.kiro/settings/templates/specs/ existsDirectory Creation Failed:
Phase Execution Failed (Phase 2-4):
/kiro-spec-{next-phase} {feature}"Sanity Review Failed:
/kiro-spec-design {feature}, /kiro-spec-tasks {feature}, or manual edits depending on the findingUser Cancellation (Interactive Mode):