stock-correlation

name

stock-correlation

description

Analyze stock correlations to find related companies and trading pairs. Use when the user asks about correlated stocks, related companies, sector peers, trading pairs, or how two or more stocks move together. Triggers: "what correlates with NVDA", "find stocks related to AMD", "correlation between AAPL and MSFT", "what moves with", "sector peers", "pair trading", "correlated stocks", "when NVDA drops what else drops", "stocks that move together", "beta to", "relative performance", "supply chain partners", "correlation matrix", "co-movement", "related tickers", "sympathy plays", "semiconductor peers", "hedging pair", "realized correlation", "rolling correlation", or any request about stocks that move in tandem or inversely. Also triggers for well-known pairs like AMD/NVDA, GOOGL/AVGO, LITE/COHR. If only one ticker is provided, infer the user wants correlated peers.

Stock Correlation Analysis Skill

Finds and analyzes correlated stocks using historical price data from Yahoo Finance via yfinance. Routes to specialized sub-skills based on user intent.

Important: This is for research and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. yfinance is not affiliated with Yahoo, Inc.

---

Step 1: Ensure Dependencies Are Available

Current environment status:

!`python3 -c "import yfinance, pandas, numpy; print(f'yfinance={yfinance.__version__} pandas={pandas.__version__} numpy={numpy.__version__}')" 2>/dev/null || echo "DEPS_MISSING"`

If DEPS_MISSING, install required packages before running any code:

import subprocess, sys
subprocess.check_call([sys.executable, "-m", "pip", "install", "-q", "yfinance", "pandas", "numpy"])

If all dependencies are already installed, skip the install step and proceed directly.

---

Step 2: Route to the Correct Sub-Skill

Classify the user's request and jump to the matching sub-skill section below.

User Request	Route To	Examples
Single ticker, wants to find related stocks	Sub-Skill A: Co-movement Discovery	"what correlates with NVDA", "find stocks related to AMD", "sympathy plays for TSLA"
Two or more specific tickers, wants relationship details	Sub-Skill B: Return Correlation	"correlation between AMD and NVDA", "how do LITE and COHR move together", "compare AAPL vs MSFT"
Group of tickers, wants structure/grouping	Sub-Skill C: Sector Clustering	"correlation matrix for FAANG", "cluster these semiconductor stocks", "sector peers for AMD"
Wants time-varying or conditional correlation	Sub-Skill D: Realized Correlation	"rolling correlation AMD NVDA", "when NVDA drops what else drops", "how has correlation changed"

If ambiguous, default to Sub-Skill A (Co-movement Discovery) for single tickers, or Sub-Skill B (Return Correlation) for two tickers.

Defaults for all sub-skills

Parameter	Default
Lookback period	1y (1 year)
Data interval	1d (daily)
Correlation method	Pearson
Minimum correlation threshold	0.60
Number of results	Top 10
Return type	Daily log returns
Rolling window	60 trading days

---

Sub-Skill A: Co-movement Discovery

Goal: Given a single ticker, find stocks that move with it.

A1: Build the peer universe

You need 15-30 candidates. Do not use hardcoded ticker lists — build the universe dynamically at runtime. See references/sector_universes.md for the full implementation. The approach:

1. Screen same-industry stocks using yf.screen() + yf.EquityQuery to find stocks in the same industry as the target
2. Broaden to sector if the industry screen returns fewer than 10 peers
3. Add thematic/adjacent industries — read the target's longBusinessSummary and screen 1-2 related industries (e.g., a semiconductor company → also screen semiconductor equipment)
4. Combine, deduplicate, remove target ticker

A2: Compute correlations

import yfinance as yf
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

def discover_comovement(target_ticker, peer_tickers, period="1y"):
    all_tickers = [target_ticker] + [t for t in peer_tickers if t != target_ticker]
    data = yf.download(all_tickers, period=period, auto_adjust=True, progress=False)

    # Extract close prices — yf.download returns MultiIndex (Price, Ticker) columns
    closes = data["Close"].dropna(axis=1, thresh=max(60, len(data) // 2))

    # Log returns
    returns = np.log(closes / closes.shift(1)).dropna()
    corr_series = returns.corr()[target_ticker].drop(target_ticker, errors="ignore")

    # Rank by absolute correlation
    ranked = corr_series.abs().sort_values(ascending=False)

    result = pd.DataFrame({
        "Ticker": ranked.index,
        "Correlation": [round(corr_series[t], 4) for t in ranked.index],
    })
    return result, returns

A3: Present results

Show a ranked table with company names and sectors (fetch via yf.Ticker(t).info.get("shortName")):

Rank	Ticker	Company	Correlation	Why linked
1	AMD	Advanced Micro Devices	0.82	Same industry — GPU/CPU
2	AVGO	Broadcom	0.78	AI infrastructure peer

Include:

• Top 10 positively correlated stocks
• Any notable negatively correlated stocks (potential hedges)
• Brief explanation of why each might be linked (sector, supply chain, customer overlap)

---

Sub-Skill B: Return Correlation

Goal: Deep-dive into the relationship between two (or a few) specific tickers.

B1: Download and compute

import yfinance as yf
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

def return_correlation(ticker_a, ticker_b, period="1y"):
    data = yf.download([ticker_a, ticker_b], period=period, auto_adjust=True, progress=False)
    closes = data["Close"][[ticker_a, ticker_b]].dropna()

    returns = np.log(closes / closes.shift(1)).dropna()
    corr = returns[ticker_a].corr(returns[ticker_b])

    # Beta: how much does B move per unit move of A
    cov_matrix = returns.cov()
    beta = cov_matrix.loc[ticker_b, ticker_a] / cov_matrix.loc[ticker_a, ticker_a]

    # R-squared
    r_squared = corr ** 2

    # Rolling 60-day correlation for stability
    rolling_corr = returns[ticker_a].rolling(60).corr(returns[ticker_b])

    # Spread (log price ratio) for mean-reversion
    spread = np.log(closes[ticker_a] / closes[ticker_b])
    spread_z = (spread - spread.mean()) / spread.std()

    return {
        "correlation": round(corr, 4),
        "beta": round(beta, 4),
        "r_squared": round(r_squared, 4),
        "rolling_corr_mean": round(rolling_corr.mean(), 4),
        "rolling_corr_std": round(rolling_corr.std(), 4),
        "rolling_corr_min": round(rolling_corr.min(), 4),
        "rolling_corr_max": round(rolling_corr.max(), 4),
        "spread_z_current": round(spread_z.iloc[-1], 4),
        "observations": len(returns),
    }

B2: Present results

Show a summary card:

Metric	Value
Pearson Correlation	0.82
Beta (B vs A)	1.15
R-squared	0.67
Rolling Corr (60d avg)	0.80
Rolling Corr Range	[0.55, 0.94]
Rolling Corr Std Dev	0.08
Spread Z-Score (current)	+1.2
Observations	250

Interpretation guide:

• Correlation > 0.80: Strong co-movement — these stocks are tightly linked
• Correlation 0.50–0.80: Moderate — shared sector drivers but independent factors too
• Correlation < 0.50: Weak — limited co-movement despite possible sector overlap
• High rolling std: Unstable relationship — correlation varies significantly over time
• Spread Z > |2|: Unusual divergence from historical relationship

---

Sub-Skill C: Sector Clustering

Goal: Given a group of tickers, show the full correlation structure and identify clusters.

C1: Build the correlation matrix

import yfinance as yf
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

def sector_clustering(tickers, period="1y"):
    data = yf.download(tickers, period=period, auto_adjust=True, progress=False)

    # yf.download returns MultiIndex (Price, Ticker) columns
    closes = data["Close"].dropna(axis=1, thresh=max(60, len(data) // 2))
    returns = np.log(closes / closes.shift(1)).dropna()
    corr_matrix = returns.corr()

    # Hierarchical clustering order
    from scipy.cluster.hierarchy import linkage, leaves_list
    from scipy.spatial.distance import squareform

    dist_matrix = 1 - corr_matrix.abs()
    np.fill_diagonal(dist_matrix.values, 0)
    condensed = squareform(dist_matrix)
    linkage_matrix = linkage(condensed, method="ward")
    order = leaves_list(linkage_matrix)
    ordered_tickers = [corr_matrix.columns[i] for i in order]

    # Reorder matrix
    clustered = corr_matrix.loc[ordered_tickers, ordered_tickers]

    return clustered, returns

Note: if scipy is not available, fall back to sorting by average correlation instead of hierarchical clustering.

C2: Present results

1. Full correlation matrix — formatted as a table. For more than 8 tickers, show as a heatmap description or highlight only the strongest/weakest pairs.

2. Identified clusters — group tickers that have high intra-group correlation:

   • Cluster 1: [NVDA, AMD, AVGO] — avg intra-correlation 0.82
   • Cluster 2: [AAPL, MSFT] — avg intra-correlation 0.75

3. Outliers — tickers with low average correlation to the group (potential diversifiers).

4. Strongest pairs — top 5 highest-correlation pairs in the matrix.

5. Weakest pairs — top 5 lowest/negative-correlation pairs (hedging candidates).

---

Sub-Skill D: Realized Correlation

Goal: Show how correlation changes over time and under different market conditions.

D1: Rolling correlation

import yfinance as yf
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

def realized_correlation(ticker_a, ticker_b, period="2y", windows=[20, 60, 120]):
    data = yf.download([ticker_a, ticker_b], period=period, auto_adjust=True, progress=False)
    closes = data["Close"][[ticker_a, ticker_b]].dropna()

    returns = np.log(closes / closes.shift(1)).dropna()

    rolling = {}
    for w in windows:
        rolling[f"{w}d"] = returns[ticker_a].rolling(w).corr(returns[ticker_b])

    return rolling, returns

D2: Regime-conditional correlation

def regime_correlation(returns, ticker_a, ticker_b, condition_ticker=None):
    """Compare correlation across up/down/volatile regimes."""
    if condition_ticker is None:
        condition_ticker = ticker_a

    ret = returns[condition_ticker]

    regimes = {
        "All Days": pd.Series(True, index=returns.index),
        "Up Days (target > 0)": ret > 0,
        "Down Days (target < 0)": ret < 0,
        "High Vol (top 25%)": ret.abs() > ret.abs().quantile(0.75),
        "Low Vol (bottom 25%)": ret.abs() < ret.abs().quantile(0.25),
        "Large Drawdown (< -2%)": ret < -0.02,
    }

    results = {}
    for name, mask in regimes.items():
        subset = returns[mask]
        if len(subset) >= 20:
            results[name] = {
                "correlation": round(subset[ticker_a].corr(subset[ticker_b]), 4),
                "days": int(mask.sum()),
            }

    return results

D3: Present results

1. Rolling correlation summary table:

Window	Current	Mean	Min	Max	Std
20-day	0.88	0.76	0.32	0.95	0.12
60-day	0.82	0.78	0.55	0.92	0.08
120-day	0.80	0.79	0.68	0.88	0.05

2. Regime correlation table:

Regime	Correlation	Days
All Days	0.82	250
Up Days	0.75	132
Down Days	0.87	118
High Vol (top 25%)	0.90	63
Large Drawdown (< -2%)	0.93	28

3. Key insight: Highlight whether correlation increases during sell-offs (very common — "correlations go to 1 in a crisis"). This is critical for risk management.

4. Trend: Is correlation trending higher or lower recently vs. its historical average?

---

Step 3: Respond to the User

After running the appropriate sub-skill, present results clearly:

Always include

• The lookback period and data interval used
• The number of observations (trading days)
• Any tickers dropped due to insufficient data

Always caveat

• Correlation is not causation — co-movement does not imply a causal link
• Past correlation does not guarantee future correlation — regimes shift
• Short lookback windows produce noisy estimates; longer windows smooth but may miss regime changes

Practical applications (mention when relevant)

• Sympathy plays: Stocks likely to follow a peer's earnings/news move
• Pair trading: High-correlation pairs where the spread has diverged from its mean
• Portfolio diversification: Finding low-correlation assets to reduce risk
• Hedging: Identifying inversely correlated instruments
• Sector rotation: Understanding which sectors move together
• Risk management: Correlation spikes during stress — diversification may fail when needed most

Important: Never recommend specific trades. Present data and let the user draw conclusions.

---

Reference Files

• references/sector_universes.md — Dynamic peer universe construction using yfinance Screener API

Read the reference file when you need to build a peer universe for a given ticker.