with one click
sprint
Work on a batch of GitHub issues in parallel using Agent Teams. Creates one worktree per issue with TDD enforcement, coordinates via a lead agent, then produces stacked PRs.
Menu
Work on a batch of GitHub issues in parallel using Agent Teams. Creates one worktree per issue with TDD enforcement, coordinates via a lead agent, then produces stacked PRs.
| name | sprint |
| description | Work on a batch of GitHub issues in parallel using Agent Teams. Creates one worktree per issue with TDD enforcement, coordinates via a lead agent, then produces stacked PRs. |
Work on multiple GitHub issues in parallel. Each issue gets its own worktree with TDD enforcement. A lead agent coordinates, and stacked PRs are created when all work is done.
When this skill is invoked, you MUST execute these steps immediately.
Check if Agent Teams are available:
echo "${CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS:-not_set}"
If the value is not_set or empty, fall back to setup-only mode:
/write-tests to begin the TDD cycle,
or set CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 and re-run /sprint."/work-on-issue — it would create duplicate worktrees.
The worktrees and TDD markers are already set up.Extract comma-separated issue numbers from $ARGUMENTS:
# prefixes, spaces, and other punctuation67,68,69,70 or #67 #68 #69ISSUES=(67 68 69 70)Spawn one issue-worker agent per issue, all in a single message so they run in parallel:
Task tool (ALL in one message):
For issue 67:
subagent_type: issue-worker
description: "issue-worker #67"
prompt: "Read GitHub issue #67 and extract:
1. Goal
2. Acceptance criteria
3. Edge cases and constraints
4. Files likely to be touched"
For issue 68:
subagent_type: issue-worker
description: "issue-worker #68"
prompt: "Read GitHub issue #68 and extract: ..."
(etc.)
Wait for all agents to return. Collect requirements for each issue.
For each issue, create a worktree and activate TDD:
.claude/scripts/worktree-create.sh issue-<N>-<short-desc> && \
cd .worktrees/issue-<N>-<short-desc> && \
bash .claude/hooks/tdd-state.sh activate <N> && \
cd -
Before launching parallel work, check if any issues touch the same files:
Create an Agent Team with one teammate per issue.
Lead (delegate mode — coordinates only, does not implement):
Teammates (one per issue, spawned as parallel Task agents):
Task tool (ALL in one message):
For issue 67:
subagent_type: general-purpose
description: "sprint-teammate #67"
prompt: |
You are working on GitHub issue #67.
Working directory: .worktrees/issue-67-<desc>/
TDD enforcement is active.
Requirements:
<requirements from step 2>
Your workflow:
1. cd into your worktree
2. Create todos from acceptance criteria (TaskCreate)
3. For each todo, use the Task tool to spawn:
- subagent_type: tester (to write failing tests)
- subagent_type: implementer (to make tests pass)
Then run /update-docs if APIs changed
4. When all todos complete, report:
- Files you touched (git diff --name-only)
- APIs you changed (old → new signatures)
- Dependencies on other issues (if any)
- Any conflicts you encountered
For issue 68:
subagent_type: general-purpose
description: "sprint-teammate #68"
prompt: ...
(etc.)
After all teammates finish, collect from each:
Spawn the pr-planner agent to determine dependency ordering:
Task tool:
subagent_type: pr-planner
description: "pr-planner for sprint"
prompt: "Given these completed issues and their changes, determine
the optimal PR ordering. Consider file dependencies, API changes,
and which PRs can merge independently vs. which must be stacked.
Issue reports:
<collected reports>
Output: ordered list of PRs with base branches"
Then create branches and PRs. For stacked PRs, rebase each branch onto the previous one before creating the PR:
# First PR targets main directly
gh pr create --base main --head issue-67-branch ...
# Subsequent PRs: rebase onto the previous branch first
git checkout issue-68-branch
git rebase issue-67-branch
git push --force-with-lease
gh pr create --base issue-67-branch --head issue-68-branch ...
If rebase conflicts arise, report them to the user rather than auto-resolving.
Output a summary table:
## Sprint Complete
| Issue | PR | Base | Status | Files Changed |
|-------|-----|------|--------|---------------|
| #67 | #XX | main | Created | 3 files |
| #68 | #YY | issue-67-branch | Created | 5 files |
| #69 | #ZZ | issue-68-branch | Created | 2 files |
Stacked PR order: #XX → #YY → #ZZ
/work-on-issue instead)CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS env var must be set to 1/sprint 67,68,69
│
├─ Fetch requirements (parallel issue-worker agents)
├─ Create worktrees + activate TDD
├─ Create Agent Team (lead = delegate, teammates = workers)
│
├─ Teammate #67 (worktree, TDD, subagents for test/impl/docs)
├─ Teammate #68 (worktree, TDD, subagents for test/impl/docs)
├─ Teammate #69 (worktree, TDD, subagents for test/impl/docs)
│
├─ Lead mediates conflicts
├─ pr-planner determines ordering
├─ Rebase for stacking (conflicts reported to user)
└─ Stacked PRs created
Generate OpenEnv environments from a concrete use case (for example, "generate an env for the library textarena"). Use when asked to design or implement a new environment under envs/ by researching a target library/API, selecting matching OpenEnv examples, asking key implementation questions, and building models/client/server/openenv.yaml. Do not use for model training or evaluation tasks.
Release workflow for deploying OpenEnv environments to Hugging Face Spaces and keeping canonical references in sync.
Deploy an OpenEnv environment to Hugging Face Spaces. Use when asked to deploy, push to Hugging Face, or update a space.
Monitor a PR's CI checks and Greptile code review after submission. Polls CI status, auto-fixes failures via ralph-loop, waits for Greptile review, addresses comments, and iterates until green.
Diagnose and recover failing or stuck Hugging Face Space deployments for OpenEnv environments. Use when deploying envs from `envs/` to the Hub (`openenv` namespace with version suffixes), when Spaces are in `BUILDING`/`APP_STARTING`/`RUNTIME_ERROR`, or when release collections need to be reconciled after targeted redeploys.
Validate changes before submitting a pull request. Run comprehensive checks including lint, tests, alignment review, and RFC analysis. Use before creating a PR, when asked if code is ready for review, or before pushing for PR.