| name | sf-lwc |
| description | Lightning Web Components with PICKLES methodology and 165-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user creates/edits LWC components, touches lwc/**/*.js, .html, .css, .js-meta.xml files, or asks about wire service, SLDS, or Jest LWC tests. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Apex classes (use sf-apex), Aura components, or Visualforce.
|
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"version":"2.1.0","author":"Jag Valaiyapathy","scoring":"165 points across 8 categories (SLDS 2 + Dark Mode compliant)"} |
sf-lwc: Lightning Web Components Development
Use this skill when the user needs Lightning Web Components: LWC bundles, wire patterns, Apex/GraphQL integration, SLDS 2 styling, accessibility, performance work, or Jest unit tests.
When This Skill Owns the Task
Use sf-lwc when the work involves:
lwc/**/*.js, .html, .css, .js-meta.xml- component scaffolding and bundle design
- wire service, Apex integration, GraphQL integration
- SLDS 2, dark mode, and accessibility work
- Jest unit tests for LWC
Delegate elsewhere when the user is:
- writing Apex controllers or business logic first → sf-apex
- building Flow XML rather than an LWC screen component → sf-flow
- deploying metadata → sf-deploy
Required Context to Gather First
Ask for or infer:
- component purpose and target surface
- data source: LDS, Apex, GraphQL, LMS, or external system via Apex
- whether the user needs tests
- whether the component must run in Flow, App Builder, Experience Cloud, or dashboard contexts
- accessibility and styling expectations
Recommended Workflow
1. Choose the right architecture
Use the PICKLES mindset:
- prototype
- integrate the right data source
- compose component boundaries
- define interaction model
- use platform libraries
- optimize execution
- enforce security
2. Choose the right data access pattern
| Need | Default pattern |
|---|
| single-record UI | LDS / getRecord |
| simple CRUD form | base record form components |
| complex server query | Apex @AuraEnabled(cacheable=true) |
| related graph data | GraphQL wire adapter |
| cross-DOM communication | Lightning Message Service |
3. Start from an asset when useful
Use provided assets for:
- basic component bundles
- datatables
- modal patterns
- Flow screen components
- GraphQL components
- LMS message channels
- Jest tests
- TypeScript-enabled components
4. Validate for frontend quality
Check:
- accessibility
- SLDS 2 / dark mode compliance
- event contracts
- performance / rerender safety
- Jest coverage when required
5. Hand off supporting backend or deploy work
Use:
High-Signal Rules
- prefer platform base components over reinventing controls
- use
@wire for reactive read-only use cases; imperative calls for explicit actions and DML paths
- do not introduce inaccessible custom UI
- avoid hardcoded colors; use SLDS 2-compatible styling hooks / variables
- avoid rerender loops in
renderedCallback()
- keep component communication patterns explicit and minimal
Output Format
When finishing, report in this order:
- Component(s) created or updated
- Data access pattern chosen
- Files changed
- Accessibility / styling / testing notes
- Next implementation or deploy step
Suggested shape:
LWC work: <summary>
Pattern: <wire / apex / graphql / lms / flow-screen>
Files: <paths>
Quality: <a11y, SLDS2, dark mode, Jest>
Next step: <deploy, add controller, or run tests>
Local Development Server
Preview LWC components locally with hot reload — no deployment needed:
sf lightning dev component --target-org <alias>
sf lightning dev app --target-org <alias>
sf lightning dev site --target-org <alias>
In current SF CLI releases, these Local Dev commands are installed just-in-time the first time you run them. They are long-running processes that open a browser with live preview. Changes to .js, .html, and .css files auto-reload instantly. Requires an active org connection for data and Apex callouts.
Cross-Skill Integration
| Need | Delegate to | Reason |
|---|
| Apex controller or service | sf-apex | backend logic |
| embed in Flow screens | sf-flow | declarative orchestration |
| deploy component bundle | sf-deploy | org rollout |
| create metadata like message channels | sf-metadata | supporting metadata |
Reference Map
Start here
Accessibility / performance / state
Integration / advanced features
Score Guide
| Score | Meaning |
|---|
| 150+ | production-ready LWC bundle |
| 125–149 | strong component with minor polish left |
| 100–124 | functional but review recommended |
| < 100 | needs significant improvement |
