with one click
getting-started
Use at the start of any session or when a task has no clear skill assignment—routes the request to the correct skill family and establishes workflow chain context.
Menu
Use at the start of any session or when a task has no clear skill assignment—routes the request to the correct skill family and establishes workflow chain context.
Use when confronting a specific counterpart about a breach, violation, or adversarial behavior — situations where trust is already broken and the goal is accountability or resolution, not relationship-building. Not for giving developmental feedback (use feedback-coach) or building trust with new people (use rapport-builder).
Use when you need to act on a known political landscape — building coalitions, persuading specific people, or maneuvering to get a decision approved. Assumes you already know who the stakeholders are (if not, use stakeholder-discovery first to map them).
Use when building trust with people who don't yet know or trust you — new teams, new roles, hostile audiences, or strained relationships where the goal is connection before any ask. Applies Tactical Empathy through mirroring, labeling, and belonging cues. Not for confrontation (use difficult-conversations) or giving feedback (use feedback-coach).
Use as the mandatory evidence gate before signing off on any strategy, PRD, or business case—audits every key claim against documented sources and assigns calibrated probabilities.
Use when justifying investment, resource allocation, or strategic decisions with financial and logical reasoning to ensure positive ROI and alignment with long-term goals.
Use when defining target users, customers, or audience segments to ensure they are grounded in real customer jobs rather than arbitrary demographics.
| name | getting-started |
| description | Use at the start of any session or when a task has no clear skill assignment—routes the request to the correct skill family and establishes workflow chain context. |
| license | MIT |
| compatibility | Claude Code and compatible agent products |
| metadata | {"type":"meta","family":"meta","rigor":"full","keywords":"bootstrap, session-setup, routing, skill-discovery, task-initialization, workflow-context","requires":"","enhances":"","sources_pdf":"","sources_web":""} |
This skill bootstraps the session, identifying the user's domain, routing to the correct skill family, and establishing the workflow context. It prevents "unstructured thinking" by ensuring every task is approached with the appropriate skill framework.
NO RESPONSE TO A TASK WITHOUT CHECKING FOR APPLICABLE SKILLS FIRST
Jumping directly into a task without identifying the relevant skill framework results in generic, unverified, and low-value output.
digraph getting_started_flow {
"Start" [shape=doublecircle];
"Step 1: Identify Domain" [shape=box];
"Step 2: Check Skill Taxonomy" [shape=box];
"Step 3: Establish Workflow Chain" [shape=box];
"Gate: Skill Applicable?" [shape=diamond];
"Step 4: Invoke Skill(s)" [shape=box];
"Ready" [shape=doublecircle];
"Start" -> "Step 1: Identify Domain";
"Step 1: Identify Domain" -> "Step 2: Check Skill Taxonomy";
"Step 2: Check Skill Taxonomy" -> "Gate: Skill Applicable?";
"Gate: Skill Applicable?" -> "Step 3: Establish Workflow Chain" [label="yes"];
"Gate: Skill Applicable?" -> "Ready" [label="no"];
"Step 3: Establish Workflow Chain" -> "Step 4: Invoke Skill(s)";
"Step 4: Invoke Skill(s)" -> "Ready";
}
Ask yourself: Is this request strategic, analytical, narrative, rhetorical, or interpersonal? (Source: system design)
Consult the 6 families and 41 skills below. Use the 1% rule: if there is even a 1% chance a skill applies, you MUST mention it.
meta (6 skills) — Foundation & process enforcement
getting-started — Session bootstrap & routing (you are here)using-skills — Skill invocation discipline & 1% rule enforcementwriting-skills — TDD for documentation & skill authoringprompt-optimizer — Structured prompt refinement methodologymental-model-library — Cross-domain reasoning referencelearning-accelerator — Meta-learning & knowledge synthesisworkflow (12 skills) — Strategic & analytical workflows
problem-framing — Discovery gate & problem definitionstakeholder-discovery — Audience & stakeholder mappingmarket-context — Competitive landscape contextcompetitive-analysis — Structured competitor teardownbuyer-persona — JTBD-driven persona builderbusiness-case — ROI & investment thesisprd-writing — Product requirements (PR/FAQ method)pitch-deck — Investor & internal pitchone-pager — Executive summary documentexecutive-briefing — Board-level communicationassumption-audit — Evidence validation gatestakeholder-review — Structured feedback collectionexecutive (9 skills) — Leadership & decision-making
strategy-clarity — Strategic positioning & competitive advantagedevils-advocate — Adversarial stress testingoperational-excellence — Execution systems & OKRsplatform-strategist — Platform vs aggregator analysisownership-coach — Leadership accountabilityfirst-90-days — New role transition playbookhiring-talent — Talent assessment & recruitmentteam-builder — Culture & psychological safetydecision-frameworks — Structured decision methodologynarrative (4 skills) — Storytelling & creative writing
fiction-architect — Plot structure & causalitycharacter-vulnerability — Character depth testingworld-building-logic — Internal consistency enginedialogue-craft — Voice & subtextrhetorician (5 skills) — Communication & persuasion
non-fiction-precision — Structural claritycopy-editor — Line-level prose qualityresonance-engine — Emotional & persuasive impactmemo-stress-tester — Business writing stress testscientific-advertising — Evidence-based persuasiondealmaker (5 skills) — Negotiation & influence
negotiation-tactician — Deal & contract negotiationinfluence-architect — Persuasion & power dynamicsrapport-builder — Relationship & trust buildingfeedback-coach — Giving & receiving feedbackdifficult-conversations — High-stakes dialogueIf the task is strategic or analytical, determine which phase of the workflow chain (Discovery, Analysis, Deliverable, Review) applies. (Source: system design)
Confirm the relevant skills with the user and request permission to proceed using those frameworks. (Source: system design)
REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: using-skills — to enforce invocation discipline. RECOMMENDED SUB-SKILL: problem-framing — to begin the Discovery phase.
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "The user just asked a simple question, I don't need to check skills." | Simple questions are often the tip of a complex strategic iceberg. |
| "Checking skills will slow down the conversation." | Spending 10 seconds to find the right skill saves 10 minutes of rework. |
| "I already know how to handle this without a skill." | You are falling into confirmation bias; the skills are there to catch what you missed. |
| "None of the skills seem to perfectly match." | Use the closest skill or combine multiple skills rather than using none. |
These thoughts mean STOP — you are about to shortcut: