| name | ld-permissions |
| description | Guide for Lightdash's CASL-based authorization system. Use when working with scopes, custom roles, abilities, permissions, ForbiddenError, authorization, or access control. Helps with adding new scopes, debugging permission issues, understanding the permission flow, and creating custom roles. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Grep, Glob, Task |
Permissions & Authorization Guide
This skill helps you work with Lightdash's CASL-based permissions system, including scopes, custom roles, and authorization enforcement.
What do you need help with?
- Add a new scope/permission - Step-by-step guide to add a new permission
- Debug a permission issue - Troubleshoot why a user can't access something
- Understand the permission flow - Learn how permissions work end-to-end
- Work with custom roles - Create or modify custom roles with specific scopes
Quick Reference
Key Files
| Purpose | Location |
|---|
| Scope definitions | packages/common/src/authorization/scopes.ts |
| CASL types | packages/common/src/authorization/types.ts |
| Ability builder | packages/common/src/authorization/index.ts |
| System role abilities | packages/common/src/authorization/projectMemberAbility.ts |
| Role-to-scope mapping | packages/common/src/authorization/roleToScopeMapping.ts |
| Scope-to-CASL conversion | packages/common/src/authorization/scopeAbilityBuilder.ts |
Common Patterns
Backend permission check:
import { subject } from '@casl/ability';
import { ForbiddenError } from '@lightdash/common';
if (user.ability.cannot('manage', subject('Dashboard', { projectUuid }))) {
throw new ForbiddenError('You do not have permission');
}
Frontend permission check:
const { user } = useUser();
if (user?.ability.can('manage', 'Dashboard')) {
return <EditButton />;
}
or wrap in a CASL component:
import { Can } from '../../providers/Ability';
<Can I="manage" a="Dashboard">
<EditButton />
</Can>
Full Documentation
For comprehensive documentation, read: .context/PERMISSIONS.md
This includes:
- Architecture diagram showing the complete permission flow
- All scope groups and modifiers (@self, @public, @space, etc.)
- Database schema for custom roles
- Step-by-step guide to add new scopes
- Troubleshooting guide
Adding a New Scope (Quick Guide)
- Define scope in
packages/common/src/authorization/scopes.ts:
{
name: 'manage:NewFeature',
description: 'Description for custom role UI',
isEnterprise: false,
group: ScopeGroup.PROJECT_MANAGEMENT,
getConditions: (context) => [addUuidCondition(context)],
}
-
Add subject (if new) in packages/common/src/authorization/types.ts
-
Add to system role in packages/common/src/authorization/roleToScopeMapping.ts
-
Update ability builder in packages/common/src/authorization/projectMemberAbility.ts
-
Enforce in service with user.ability.cannot() check
-
Add frontend check with user?.ability.can()
Changing the Scope Vocabulary (Migrating Custom Roles)
Custom roles persist scope names as strings in the scoped_roles table (role_uuid, scope_name, granted_by). They are decoupled from system roles and do not auto-update when the scope vocabulary changes. Any rename / split / merge / removal must include a Knex migration that reconciles existing rows, otherwise self-hosted instances silently lose or retain permissions.
Before merging a scope change, evaluate the impact and write a migration:
| Change | Impact on scoped_roles | Required migration |
|---|
Rename a scope (e.g. manage:Foo → manage:Bar) | Old rows reference a name that no longer exists in scopes.ts. parseScopes drops them as invalid, silently revoking access. | UPDATE scoped_roles SET scope_name = 'new' WHERE scope_name = 'old' |
Split one scope into two (e.g. manage:CustomSql → manage:CustomSql + manage:CustomFields) | Roles with the original scope lose access to whichever capability moved to the new scope. | Backfill the new scope for every role that has the original (INSERT ... SELECT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING). See 20260417111420_grant_custom_fields_to_custom_sql_roles.ts. |
| Merge two scopes into one | Roles with only one of the merged scopes may gain or lose capability. | Insert the merged scope where either source exists; then delete the old rows. |
| Remove a scope | Rows reference a non-existent scope name, spamming Invalid scope: ... warnings from parseScopes on every request. | Delete the orphaned rows. See 20260519142606_remove_legacy_dashboard_export_scopes.ts. |
| Tighten conditions on an existing scope | No row change needed, but the behavioral change is invisible to operators. | None on the table; note in PR description. |
| Add a brand-new scope | No existing rows are affected. Only system roles in roleToScopeMapping.ts need updating. | None for custom roles. |
Migration conventions (see packages/backend/src/database/CLAUDE.md for general safe-migration rules):
- Wrap the body in
try/catch and log a recoverable manual-fix command on failure. These backfills are best-effort cleanup — failing them should never block subsequent migrations.
- Use
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING for inserts since (role_uuid, scope_name) is the natural unique key.
- Preserve
granted_by from the source row when copying a scope, so audit history points back at the original grantor rather than NULL.
- Provide a sensible
down() — usually deleting the rows the up() inserted. If the change is irreversible (legacy cleanup), document why down() is a no-op.
Checklist when changing the scope vocabulary:
- Determine which change type applies (rename / split / merge / remove / add / tighten).
- If a migration is required, create it with
pnpm -F backend create-migration <name> and follow the patterns above.
- Update
roleToScopeMapping.ts so system roles reflect the new vocabulary, and run the parity test.
- Call this out in the PR description so reviewers can verify the data migration matches the code change.
Debugging Permission Issues
When a user gets "ForbiddenError":
- Check scope exists - Is the scope defined in
scopes.ts?
- Check role assignment - Does the user's role include this scope?
- Check conditions - Do the CASL conditions match the resource?
- Check enterprise flag - Is
isEnterprise: true but deployment isn't enterprise?
- Check subject name - Case-sensitive match in
CaslSubjectNames?
Use grep to find where the permission is checked:
grep -r "ability.cannot.*'manage'.*'YourSubject'" packages/backend/src/services/
Please describe what you're trying to accomplish, or ask me to explain any aspect of the permissions system.