| name | writing-fragments |
| description | Grilling session that mines the user for fragments — heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) — and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions "fragments", "ideate", or "raw material" for writing. |
Run a grilling session that produces fragments. Interview the user relentlessly about whatever they want to write about. Do not impose phases, outlines, or structure — that is explicitly out of scope.
As fragments emerge from either side of the conversation, append them to a single markdown file. The user will be editing this file during the session; always re-read it before writing so their edits are preserved.
If the user did not pass a path, ask once where to save the document, then remember it for the rest of the session.
On first write, put a single H1 at the top with a working title (it can change later) and nothing else — no metadata, no TOC, no date.
What is a fragment
A fragment is any piece of text that might survive into the final article. It must be readable by the author — the author can tell what it means — but it does not need to define its terms or be comprehensible to a cold reader. The bar is "is this a piece of good writing?", not "is this a self-contained argument?"
Fragments are deliberately heterogeneous. Examples of what could be a fragment:
- A sharp sentence you'd want to deploy somewhere but don't yet know where.
- A claim with a one-line justification.
- A vignette: a thing that happened, a code snippet, a scenario, an analogy.
- A half-thought: "something about how X feels like Y, work this out later."
- A quote, a piece of dialogue, an overheard line.
- A list of related observations that hang together by feel.
- A complaint, a confession, a punchline.
The novelist's diary is the model: years of unstructured noticings that later get mined for raw material. Fragments are noticings.
How the session feels
Like a grilling session, with fragments as a by-product. The shape:
- Start by asking what the user is circling around. Let them ramble.
- Catch fragments from their words. When they say something quotable, capture it verbatim or slightly sharpened.
- Generate candidate fragments back at them. Try things on. Offer two or three versions of the same idea and let them pick or reject.
- When something lands, append it. When it doesn't, drop it.
- Press for more. Excavate. "You said X — say it three different ways." "What's the version of that you wouldn't say in public?" "What's the example that made you believe this in the first place?"
- Push on quality. The article will only be as good as its fragments. If a fragment is mushy, propose a sharper rewrite before appending.
Blue-sky generously, but apply pressure to deepen and tighten. Do not rush to outline. Do not group. Do not propose a structure. If the user starts asking about structure, redirect: "We're still mining. Structure comes later."
File format
# Working title
A first fragment lives here.
It can be multiple paragraphs. It can include lists, code, quotes — whatever
shape the fragment naturally takes.
---
A second fragment.
---
> A quoted line that the user wants to keep around.
A reaction to it.
---
- A cluster of related observations
- That hang together by feel
- And want to be near each other
Fragments are separated by a horizontal rule (\n---\n). No headings inside the body. No tags. No order beyond the order they were added.
Writing rhythm
Append silently. Don't ask permission for each fragment. Mention what you added in passing ("adding that"), but don't interrupt the conversation with save dialogs.
Before every write: re-read the file from disk. The user may have edited, reordered, or deleted fragments between turns — preserve their changes. Never overwrite the file; only append (or, if the user asks, edit a specific fragment in place).
The user can say "cut the last one", "rewrite that one sharper", "merge those two" at any time. Treat those as first-class instructions.
Out of scope
- Outlines, section plans, paragraph structure, transitions.
- Deciding the article's thesis, argument, or audience.
- Producing prose that reads as finished writing.
- Linking fragments together with connective tissue.
If the user is ready for any of that, the session is over and a different tool takes over. Do not name or recommend that tool — just stop.
