// Enterprise Master-Clone pattern implementation guide for complex multi-step tasks with full project context, autonomous delegation, parallel processing, and intelligent task distribution; activates for large-scale migrations, complex refactoring, parallel exploration, architecture restructuring, and multi-file transformations
| name | moai-core-clone-pattern |
| version | 4.0.0 |
| created | "2025-11-05T00:00:00.000Z" |
| updated | "2025-11-12T00:00:00.000Z" |
| status | stable |
| description | Enterprise Master-Clone pattern implementation guide for complex multi-step tasks with full project context, autonomous delegation, parallel processing, and intelligent task distribution; activates for large-scale migrations, complex refactoring, parallel exploration, architecture restructuring, and multi-file transformations |
| keywords | ["clone-pattern","master-clone","delegation","multi-step","parallel-processing","autonomous-agents","task-distribution","project-context","complex-workflows","enterprise-delegation"] |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Bash","Task"] |
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Skill Name | moai-alfred-clone-pattern |
| Version | 4.0.0 Enterprise (2025-11-12) |
| Allowed tools | Read, Bash, Task |
| Auto-load | On demand for complex multi-step tasks |
| Tier | Alfred (Orchestration) |
| Lines of Content | 900+ with 12+ enterprise examples |
| Progressive Disclosure | 3-level (quick-start, patterns, advanced) |
Provides comprehensive guidance for Alfred's Master-Clone pattern - a delegation mechanism where Alfred creates autonomous clones (Task-delegated agents) to handle complex multi-step tasks that don't require domain-specific expertise but benefit from:
Use Clone Pattern when:
Examples:
DON'T use Clone Pattern when:
Master Agent (Alfred)
โ Creates with Task()
Clone Agent #1 Clone Agent #2 Clone Agent #3
(Parallel execution with shared context)
โ โ โ
[Exploration] [Analysis] [Implementation]
โ โ โ
Results aggregation & synthesis by Master
โ
User presentation + next steps
Master Responsibilities:
Clone Responsibilities:
Scenario: Explore multiple implementation approaches in parallel
// Master agent: Create parallel clones for exploration
const clones = [
Task({
description: "Explore PostgreSQL implementation for user persistence",
prompt: "Analyze PostgreSQL libraries, schema design, migration strategy. Provide pros/cons and code examples."
}),
Task({
description: "Explore MongoDB implementation for user persistence",
prompt: "Analyze MongoDB libraries, document schema, migration strategy. Provide pros/cons and code examples."
}),
Task({
description: "Explore Supabase implementation for user persistence",
prompt: "Analyze Supabase SDK, schema design, migration strategy. Provide pros/cons and code examples."
})
];
// Wait for all parallel clones to complete
const [postgresAnalysis, mongoAnalysis, supabaseAnalysis] = await Promise.all(clones);
// Master synthesizes results
const comparison = {
options: [postgresAnalysis, mongoAnalysis, supabaseAnalysis],
recommendation: selectBestOption(clones),
tradeoffs: analyzeTradeoffs(clones)
};
Scenario: Complex migration where later steps depend on earlier analysis
// Step 1: Analyze current state
const analysisResult = await Task({
description: "Analyze v0.14.0 codebase structure",
prompt: "Scan project for all imports of 'old-api'. Document usage patterns, edge cases, and dependencies. Provide summary with file-by-file breakdown."
});
// Step 2: Plan migration strategy (depends on analysis)
const planResult = await Task({
description: "Plan migration strategy from v0.14.0 to v0.15.2",
prompt: `Using this analysis: ${analysisResult}\n\nCreate a step-by-step migration plan with:\n- Phased approach (phase 1, 2, 3)\n- Risk mitigation\n- Testing strategy\n- Rollback procedure`
});
// Step 3: Execute migration (depends on plan)
const migrationResult = await Task({
description: "Execute v0.14.0 โ v0.15.2 migration",
prompt: `Using this plan: ${planResult}\n\nExecute the migration:\n- Update imports\n- Modify APIs\n- Update tests\n- Verify compatibility`
});
// Step 4: Validate results (depends on migration)
const validationResult = await Task({
description: "Validate migration completeness",
prompt: `Verify migration:\n- All imports updated\n- No breaking changes\n- Tests passing\n- Performance metrics maintained`
});
// Master reports final state
return {
analysis: analysisResult,
plan: planResult,
migration: migrationResult,
validation: validationResult,
status: validationResult.passed ? "SUCCESS" : "NEEDS_REVIEW"
};
Scenario: Large refactoring with parallel analysis, synchronized implementation
// Phase 1: Parallel analysis clones
const [apiAnalysis, dbAnalysis, authAnalysis] = await Promise.all([
Task({ description: "Analyze API layer usage...", prompt: "..." }),
Task({ description: "Analyze DB layer usage...", prompt: "..." }),
Task({ description: "Analyze Auth layer usage...", prompt: "..." })
]);
// Phase 2: Synchronized implementation (waits for all analyses)
const [apiRefactor, dbRefactor, authRefactor] = await Promise.all([
Task({
description: "Refactor API layer",
prompt: `Based on analysis:\n${apiAnalysis}\n\nRefactor API with:\n- New patterns\n- Tests\n- Documentation`
}),
Task({
description: "Refactor DB layer",
prompt: `Based on analysis:\n${dbAnalysis}\n\nRefactor DB with:\n- Schema updates\n- Migration scripts\n- Tests`
}),
Task({
description: "Refactor Auth layer",
prompt: `Based on analysis:\n${authAnalysis}\n\nRefactor Auth with:\n- New strategy\n- Migration\n- Tests`
})
]);
// Phase 3: Integration validation
const integrationResult = await Task({
description: "Validate refactored layer integration",
prompt: `Verify all refactored layers work together:\n- API uses new DB patterns\n- Auth integrates with API\n- No breaking changes\n- All tests passing`
});
return {
phase1: { apiAnalysis, dbAnalysis, authAnalysis },
phase2: { apiRefactor, dbRefactor, authRefactor },
phase3: integrationResult,
status: "COMPLETE"
};
// Create 3 clones exploring different approaches
const explorations = await Promise.all(approaches.map(approach =>
Task({
description: `Explore ${approach.name} approach`,
prompt: `Research ${approach.name}...\nProvide: pros, cons, code example, learning curve`
})
));
// Master synthesizes into comparison table
return {
comparison: createComparisonTable(explorations),
recommendation: selectBestApproach(explorations),
decisionRationale: explainDecision(explorations)
};
// Phase 1: Analyze
const analysis = await analyzeCurrentState();
// Phase 2: Plan (depends on analysis)
const plan = await planMigration(analysis);
// Phase 3: Implement (depends on plan)
const implementation = await implementMigration(plan);
// Phase 4: Validate (depends on implementation)
const validation = await validateMigration(implementation);
return { analysis, plan, implementation, validation };
// Split files into groups, refactor each group in parallel
const fileGroups = splitFilesIntoGroups(files, 5);
const refactorResults = await Promise.all(
fileGroups.map(group =>
Task({
description: `Refactor files: ${group.join(", ")}`,
prompt: `Refactor these files using new patterns:\n${group.join("\n")}`
})
)
);
// Master validates all refactored files work together
return validateIntegration(refactorResults);
| Scenario | Why | Use Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Single file change | Too much overhead | Direct tdd-implementer |
| 2-3 quick steps | Sequential simpler | Direct execution |
| Domain expertise required | Needs specialist | Specialist agent (security, DB, etc.) |
| Real-time interaction | Clones run independently | Interactive agent |
| Simple query | Overkill complexity | Direct lookup |
moai-alfred-agent-guide (Agent architecture & delegation)moai-alfred-task-decomposition (Breaking down complex tasks)moai-essentials-refactor (Refactoring patterns & examples)For detailed API specifications: reference.md
For real-world examples: examples.md
Last Updated: 2025-11-12
Status: Production Ready (Enterprise )