| name | reading-notes |
| description | Process a book or article into structured progressive summary notes saved to the resources folder. Use when the user has finished reading something and wants to capture structured notes ā 'I just finished reading X', 'take notes on this book'. Do NOT use for: fetching and summarizing a URL now (use summarize), capturing a raw thought (use capture), or web research (use research). |
Reading Notes
Turn a book or article into structured, permanent notes using the progressive summarization method, saved to your resources folder.
Usage: /reading-notes [title] or /reading-notes then follow prompts.
Step 1: Get the Book/Article Info
Ask:
What are you taking notes on?
- Title:
- Author:
- Type: book / article / paper / other
Then ask:
Are you:
a) Sharing notes/highlights you've already taken : I'll organize them
b) Describing the book from memory : I'll structure what you share
c) Pasting raw text or quotes : I'll extract and synthesize
Step 2: Gather Content
Based on their answer:
- a): Ask them to paste their notes/highlights
- b): Ask open questions: "What were the main ideas? What did you take away? Any memorable quotes?"
- c): Ask them to paste the text
Take what they give, however messy.
Step 3: Synthesize
From the raw input, extract:
- Core thesis: What is this book/article fundamentally about?
- Key ideas: The 3-7 most important concepts
- Supporting evidence or examples: What supports each idea?
- Memorable quotes: Exact words worth keeping
- Surprises or challenges: What contradicted or changed your thinking?
- Actionable takeaways: What can you do differently because of this?
- Questions it raised: What do you want to explore further?
Step 4: Choose Subfolder
- Glob existing subfolders in
[resources_folder]/*/
- Suggest a kebab-case subfolder based on the book/article's topic (max 2 levels, e.g.
books/productivity or science/neuroscience)
- Present to user: "I'd file this under
[resources_folder]/[suggested-path]/. OK?"
- Use confirmed path for file creation.
Step 5: Create the Note
File: [resources_folder]/[subfolder]/[Book Title] - Notes.md (subfolder confirmed in Step 4)
---
tags: [reference, topic-tag]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
source: /reading-notes
author: [Author]
type: [book/article/paper]
status: [reading/finished]
rating: [1-5 if they want to rate it]
---
# [Book Title]
*by [Author]*
## Core Thesis
[One paragraph : what is this fundamentally about?]
## Key Ideas
### [Idea 1 Title]
[Explanation in your own words]
> "[Supporting quote]"
### [Idea 2 Title]
[Explanation]
### [Idea 3 Title]
[Explanation]
## Memorable Quotes
> "[Quote 1]"
> : [Author], p. [page if known]
> "[Quote 2]"
## My Takeaways
- [What this means for my work/life]
- [What I want to try or apply]
## Questions & Further Exploration
- [Question raised by this book]
- [Related topic to research: [[Related Note]]]
## Raw Highlights
<!-- Paste original highlights here for reference -->
[Raw content if provided]
## Related
[[Related Note 1]]
[[Related Note 2]]
Populate ## Related by searching for vault notes related to the book's topic (use qmd if available, otherwise Glob [resources_folder]/**/*.md, [knowledge_folder]/**/*.md).
Step 6: Suggest Tags (background)
After writing, dispatch the Tag Suggester agent (agents/tag-suggester.md) as a background sub-agent (run_in_background: true, mode: "bypassPermissions"), passing new_note_path, new_note_content, vault_root, knowledge_folder, resources_folder, areas_folder, and projects_folder. Proceed to Follow Up immediately.
Step 7: Follow Up
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
š Reading Notes ā {Title}
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
Author: {Author}
Saved to [resources_folder]/[subfolder]/[Title] - Notes.md
ā Add to a reading list in a project note?
ā Run /connect to find related vault notes.
ā Set a revisit reminder? (I'll add a task)
Known Gotchas
- Input option (b) ā describing from memory ā is the hardest path. Users often conflate the author's ideas with their own take. Ask separate questions: "What was the book's main argument?" and "What did YOU conclude or take away?" to separate source material from personal synthesis.