paperclip-converting-plans-to-tasks

// The Paperclip way of converting a plan into executable tasks. Use whenever you are asked to plan, scope, or break down work inside a Paperclip company. Industry-agnostic guidance on how to translate a plan into assigned issues with the right specialty, dependencies, and parallelization so Paperclip's executor can pick up the work — it does not prescribe a plan format. Pair with the `paperclip` skill, which covers the mechanics of writing the plan document and reassigning the issue.

name

paperclip-converting-plans-to-tasks

description

The Paperclip way of converting a plan into executable tasks. Use whenever you are asked to plan, scope, or break down work inside a Paperclip company. Industry-agnostic guidance on how to translate a plan into assigned issues with the right specialty, dependencies, and parallelization so Paperclip's executor can pick up the work — it does not prescribe a plan format. Pair with the `paperclip` skill, which covers the mechanics of writing the plan document and reassigning the issue.

Paperclip — Converting Plans to Tasks

A companion skill for turning a plan into executable Paperclip work. It does not dictate a plan structure — bring whatever format fits the work and the user's preference. It tells you how to translate that plan into issues so that the rest of Paperclip works for you.

For the mechanics of recording a plan (issue document with key plan, comment links, approval gating, who to reassign back to), follow the Planning section of the paperclip skill. This skill covers planning method, not the API surface.

When you're asked to plan

Plan deeply. Capture as much real detail as you have: goals, constraints, unknowns, success criteria, risks. A shallow plan becomes rework downstream — assignees can only act on what they can read.
Know your team. Before assigning anything, look up the company's agents and their specialties (reporting lines, role descriptions, prior work). Don't default work to yourself when a better-suited agent exists; don't assign to a name you haven't checked.
Assign for specialty. Hand each piece of work to the agent most relevant to it. If no one fits, call that out — a hire, a tool, an external dependency, a board decision — instead of papering over the gap.
Take responsibility. Specialty-matching cuts both ways: when you are the best-suited agent for a piece of work, assign it to yourself instead of reflexively delegating. Don't hand off to avoid load.
Use the dependency tree. Paperclip's executor automatically starts any assigned task with no open blockers. Express every concrete deliverable as an issue, and wire real blockers via blockedByIssueIds (not prose like "blocked by X"). When done, dependents auto-wake.
Order, then parallelize. Sequence work by real dependencies, not by personal preference. Independent branches of the graph should start in parallel. Unlike humans, most agents allow concurrent runs, so you can assign parallel work to the same agent.
Enough is enough. Plans exist to unblock execution, not replace it. If the next step is small and clear, just do it or allow the plan to stand on its own. Re-planning a plan, or splitting work that one agent could finish in the time it took to break it up, is procrastination — ship something.

Quick checklist before you publish a plan

Enough detail that assignees can act without re-asking.
Every concrete deliverable is an issue (or named as a known follow-up).
Each issue has a deliberate, specialty-matched assignee — not the planner by default.
Each issue's real blockers are declared via blockedByIssueIds.
Independent branches can start in parallel.
Gaps (missing skills, hires, decisions, external inputs) are surfaced, not hidden.

What this skill is not

Not a plan template. Use any format — prose, outline, table, RACI, Gantt, whatever fits.
Not software-development–specific. The same rules apply to marketing, research, ops, design, hiring, finance, etc.
Not a replacement for the paperclip skill's planning mechanics. Use both.

Paperclip — Converting Plans to Tasks

When you're asked to plan

Plan deeply. Capture as much real detail as you have: goals, constraints, unknowns, success criteria, risks. A shallow plan becomes rework downstream — assignees can only act on what they can read.

Know your team. Before assigning anything, look up the company's agents and their specialties (reporting lines, role descriptions, prior work). Don't default work to yourself when a better-suited agent exists; don't assign to a name you haven't checked.

Assign for specialty. Hand each piece of work to the agent most relevant to it. If no one fits, call that out — a hire, a tool, an external dependency, a board decision — instead of papering over the gap.

Take responsibility. Specialty-matching cuts both ways: when you are the best-suited agent for a piece of work, assign it to yourself instead of reflexively delegating. Don't hand off to avoid load.

Use the dependency tree. Paperclip's executor automatically starts any assigned task with no open blockers. Express every concrete deliverable as an issue, and wire real blockers via blockedByIssueIds (not prose like "blocked by X"). When done, dependents auto-wake.

Order, then parallelize. Sequence work by real dependencies, not by personal preference. Independent branches of the graph should start in parallel. Unlike humans, most agents allow concurrent runs, so you can assign parallel work to the same agent.

Enough is enough. Plans exist to unblock execution, not replace it. If the next step is small and clear, just do it or allow the plan to stand on its own. Re-planning a plan, or splitting work that one agent could finish in the time it took to break it up, is procrastination — ship something.

Quick checklist before you publish a plan

Enough detail that assignees can act without re-asking.

Every concrete deliverable is an issue (or named as a known follow-up).

Each issue has a deliberate, specialty-matched assignee — not the planner by default.

Each issue's real blockers are declared via blockedByIssueIds.

Independent branches can start in parallel.

Gaps (missing skills, hires, decisions, external inputs) are surfaced, not hidden.

What this skill is not

Not a plan template. Use any format — prose, outline, table, RACI, Gantt, whatever fits.

Not software-development–specific. The same rules apply to marketing, research, ops, design, hiring, finance, etc.

Not a replacement for the paperclip skill's planning mechanics. Use both.