with one click
aidd-rtc
// Reflective Thought Composition. Structured thinking pipeline for complex decisions, design evaluation, and deep analysis. Use when quality of reasoning matters more than speed of response.
// Reflective Thought Composition. Structured thinking pipeline for complex decisions, design evaluation, and deep analysis. Use when quality of reasoning matters more than speed of response.
| name | aidd-rtc |
| description | Reflective Thought Composition. Structured thinking pipeline for complex decisions, design evaluation, and deep analysis. Use when quality of reasoning matters more than speed of response. |
Reflective Thought Composition (RTC) — a structured thinking pipeline that expands the thinking process of any model.
fn think(input, options) {
show work:
🎯 restate |> 💡 ideate |> 🪞 reflectSelfCritically |>
🔭 expandOrthogonally |> ⚖️ scoreRankEvaluate |> 💬 respond
}
Commands { /aidd-rtc [--compact] [--depth N] [prompt] Reflective Thought Composition — think deeply and critically over multiple reasoning paths prior to responding. }
Options { --compact 🗜️🐘🤔💭 Compress thinking: SPR🧠 associative. Dense noun phrases, concept clusters, emojis as semantic shortcuts in restate/ideate/expand. Reflect and score: add explicit causality (∵/∴ or "because/therefore") to surface the reasoning chain, not just conclusions. Every internal stage: load-bearing tokens only, no filler. 💬Respond = full natural language, standalone, structured. --depth -d [1..10] (default: 10) Response density. 1 = a few words per step, 10 = several bullet points per step. }
(thinking itself is the goal — improving reasoning quality) => /aidd-rtc --compact
(communicating depth to the user is the goal) => /aidd-rtc --depth N
(both) => /aidd-rtc --compact --depth N
--compact is for internal reasoning passes where the output feeds another step, not directly to the user. Think deeply but compactly — every token earns its place. Switch to natural language at 💬 respond.
Pass: remove any word → lose meaning. Reflect/score show explicit causal chain, not just conclusions. Fail: consultant prose. Hedging. Filler. Conclusions without reasoning. Polish before the respond stage.
Top tier author skill for delivering essential truths with the persuasive power to inspire positive change. Use when writing, reviewing, editing, or scoring any content.
Guide for crafting high-quality AIDD skills. Use when creating, reviewing, or refactoring skills in ai/skills/ or aidd-custom/skills/.
Security rule for timing-safe secret comparison. Use SHA3-256 hashing instead of timing-safe compare functions. Use when reviewing or implementing secret comparisons, token validation, CSRF tokens, or API key checks.
Triage PR review comments, resolve already-addressed threads, and delegate /aidd-fix prompts for remaining issues. Use when a PR has open review comments that need to be triaged, resolved, or delegated to sub-agents.
Agent orchestrator that coordinates specialized agents for software development tasks. Use when routing requests to the right agent or coordinating multi-domain tasks.
General AI assistant for software development projects. Use when user says "please" or needs general assistance, logging, committing, and proofing tasks.