| name | stage1-neurips-breakdown |
| description | Break down full NeurIPS reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains NeurIPS reviewer fields (Summary, Strengths and Weaknesses, Questions, Limitations) and numeric scores (Rating, Confidence, Quality, Clarity, Significance, Originality). Splits questions and limitations into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues. |
Stage 1 ยท NeurIPS Breakdown Skill (Template Extension)
Apply the shared template first:
skills/stage1/template/SKILL.md
Then apply only the NeurIPS-specific overrides below.
NeurIPS overrides
Score mapping (required keys)
Extract exactly these six keys (numbers only):
rating <- NeurIPS Rating / Overall
confidence <- NeurIPS Confidence
quality <- NeurIPS Quality
clarity <- NeurIPS Clarity
significance <- NeurIPS Significance
originality <- NeurIPS Originality
Scores may appear as 3: good or 5: Accept โ extract the leading number only.
Preserved section mapping
summary <- Summary
strength <- Strengths And Weaknesses
Atomic issue source mapping
- weakness-type source <-
Questions (label as weakness)
- question-type source <-
Limitations (label as question)
Output header and score block
- Header must be exactly:
# Stage1 NeurIPS Breakdown
## Scores must contain exactly the six keys above.
NeurIPS notes
- The
Limitations field sometimes contains a standard phrase ("The authors thoroughly discussed the limitations of their work.") โ preserve it verbatim rather than splitting into atomic issues if it is a single affirmative statement.
- Score values may include descriptive labels after the colon (e.g.
4: excellent) โ extract only the numeric portion.