// Run diff-based architecture analysis with archi. Use when the user asks whether current changes are architecturally safe, what the current git diff impacts, or which changed components carry structural risk.
| name | archi-diff |
| description | Run diff-based architecture analysis with archi. Use when the user asks whether current changes are architecturally safe, what the current git diff impacts, or which changed components carry structural risk. |
Use archi for change-scoped architecture review. First inspect the local
command shape because installed Archi versions may differ.
archi --help
If help includes --full, use the new default incremental entrypoint:
archi
If help lacks --full but includes --diff, use the legacy incremental
entrypoint:
archi --diff .
When the user provides an explicit range and the local help advertises
--diff, --base, and --head, use:
archi --diff --base <base> --head <head> .
.architec/architec-summary.md.architec/architec-analysis.jsonFocus on scores.incremental, change_analysis, recommendations, and hotspots.
archi-full first.Use this response shape:
Verdict
- diff status: <safe / caution / unsafe>
- incremental score: <score>
Impacted Areas
- <component or area 1>
- <component or area 2>
- <component or area 3>
Required Changes
- <required improvement 1>
- <required improvement 2>
- <required improvement 3>
Produce architecture improvement advice from existing-code Archi analysis. Use when the user wants concrete modification suggestions, sequencing advice, or a practical refactor roadmap based on the current codebase rather than task-goal planning.
Run full-project architecture analysis with archi. Use when the user asks for an overall architecture score, full hotspot review, package topology diagnosis, or the main structural weaknesses of the current codebase.
Produce architecture improvement advice from existing-code Archi analysis. Use when the user wants concrete modification suggestions, sequencing advice, or a practical refactor roadmap based on the current codebase rather than task-goal planning.
Run diff-based architecture analysis with archi. Use when the user asks whether current changes are architecturally safe, what the current git diff impacts, or which changed components carry structural risk.
Run full-project architecture analysis with archi. Use when the user asks for an overall architecture score, full hotspot review, package topology diagnosis, or the main structural weaknesses of the current codebase.