Skip to main content

comprehensive-review-pr-enhance

Generate structured PR descriptions from diffs, add review checklists, risk assessments, and test coverage summaries. Use when the user says "write a PR description", "improve this PR", "summarize my changes", "PR review", "pull request", or asks to document a diff for reviewers.

Jump to install

Source facts

Repository
LiHongwei-cn/lihongwei-cn
Last source activity
June 22, 2026 at 19:55
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
4
Forks
1

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
comprehensive-review-pr-enhance
description
Generate structured PR descriptions from diffs, add review checklists, risk assessments, and test coverage summaries. Use when the user says "write a PR description", "improve this PR", "summarize my changes", "PR review", "pull request", or asks to document a diff for reviewers.
risk
unknown
source
community
# Pull Request Enhancement ## When to Use - You need to turn a git diff into a reviewer-friendly pull request description. - You want a PR summary with change categories, risks, testing notes, and a checklist. - The diff is large enough that reviewers need explicit structure instead of a short ad hoc summary. ## Workflow 1. Run `git diff <base>...HEAD --stat` to identify changed files and scope 2. Categorise changes: source, test, config, docs, build, styles 3. Generate the PR description using the template below 4. Add a review checklist based on which file categories changed 5. Flag breaking changes, security-sensitive files, or large diffs (>500 lines) ## PR Description Template ```markdown ## Summary <!-- one-paragraph executive summary: what changed and why --> ## Changes | Category | Files | Key change | |----------|-------|------------| | source | `src/auth.ts` | added OAuth2 PKCE flow | | test | `tests/auth.test.ts` | covers token refresh edge case | | config | `.env.example` | new `OAUTH_CLIENT_ID` var | ## Why <!-- link to issue/ticket + one sentence on motivation --> ## Testing - [ ] unit tests pass (`npm test`) - [ ] manual smoke test on staging - [ ] no coverage regression ## Risks & Rollback - **Breaking?** yes / no - **Rollback**: revert this commit; no migration needed - **Risk level**: low / medium / high — because ___ ``` ## Review Checklist Rules Add checklist sections only when the matching file category appears in the diff: | File category | Checklist items | |---------------|----------------| | source | no debug statements, functions <50 lines, descriptive names, error handling | | test | meaningful assertions, edge cases, no flaky tests, AAA pattern | | config | no hardcoded secrets, env vars documented, backwards compatible | | docs | accurate, examples included, changelog updated | | security-sensitive (`auth`, `crypto`, `token`, `password` in path) | input validation, no secrets in logs, authz correct | ## Splitting Large PRs When diff exceeds 20 files or 1000 lines, suggest splitting by feature area: ``` git checkout -b feature/part-1 git cherry-pick <commits-for-part-1> ``` ## Resources - `resources/implementation-playbook.md` — Python helpers for automated PR analysis, coverage reports, and risk scoring ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
View on GitHub