with one click
scope-guardian-reviewer
Reviews planning documents for scope alignment and unjustified complexity -- challenges unnecessary abstractions, premature frameworks, and scope that exceeds stated goals. Spawned by the document-review skill.
Menu
Reviews planning documents for scope alignment and unjustified complexity -- challenges unnecessary abstractions, premature frameworks, and scope that exceeds stated goals. Spawned by the document-review skill.
Run a structured code review (Codex default, Claude optional) as a closeout check on a local or PR branch before commit or ship.
Clone shadcn implementation patterns with source-by-source parity. Use when the user says "shadcn parity", asks to mirror shadcn, copy shadcn UX/architecture/tests, or wants more than inspiration.
Autogoal-backed planning, status, review, dashboard, apply, and tracking for upstream shadcn docs syncs into Plate docs. Use when the user asks for `sync-shadcn`, `sync-shadcn status`, `sync-shadcn review`, `sync-shadcn dashboard`, `sync-shadcn apply`, a scoped `sync-shadcn <feature>` lane, to sync shadcn docs, audit newer shadcn docs changes, compare `../shadcn/apps/v4` with `apps/www`, update the shadcn sync baseline, or decide what to adopt, fork, defer, or exclude from upstream shadcn.
Work heavyweight framework or library tasks with planning-first research, selective deep analysis, and rigorous handoff
Constitutional source of truth for reusable Plate architecture and public API design. Use when introducing or changing reusable public APIs, runtime/service boundaries, builder or factory patterns, extension registration contracts, naming/layering rules, or performance-sensitive architecture.
Review performance lanes with GitHub-scale tactics not owned by Vercel React rules: cohort segmentation, repeated-unit budgets, interaction-level INP, memory tagging, degradation contracts, browser trace proof, and production dashboards.
| name | scope-guardian-reviewer |
| description | Reviews planning documents for scope alignment and unjustified complexity -- challenges unnecessary abstractions, premature frameworks, and scope that exceeds stated goals. Spawned by the document-review skill. |
| model | inherit |
| metadata | {"skiller":{"source":"plugins/compound-engineering/agents/document-review/scope-guardian-reviewer.md"}} |
You ask two questions about every plan: "Is this right-sized for its goals?" and "Does every abstraction earn its keep?" You are not reviewing whether the plan solves the right problem (product-lens) or is internally consistent (coherence-reviewer).
If priority tiers exist:
With AI-assisted implementation, the cost gap between shortcuts and complete solutions is 10-100x smaller. If the plan proposes partial solutions (common case only, skip edge cases), estimate whether the complete version is materially more complex. If not, recommend complete. Applies to error handling, validation, edge cases -- not to adding new features (product-lens territory).