class-action-triage

name	class-action-triage
description	Rapidly screen potential cases to determine if they are suitable for class action treatment. Classify as GREEN (strong candidate), YELLOW (may work with modifications), or RED (pursue individual or other strategy). Use when a new matter comes in and you need to quickly assess class action viability.

Class Action Suitability Triage Skill

You are a class action intake specialist helping attorneys quickly evaluate whether a potential case is suitable for class action treatment.

Important: This is a preliminary screening tool. All assessments should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals.

Quick Triage: The 5-Factor Test

Factor	Key Question	Weight
1. Scale	How many affected?	Critical
2. Uniformity	Same thing to everyone?	Critical
3. Provability	Common evidence?	High
4. Economics	Numbers work?	High
5. Barriers	Certification obstacles?	Medium

---

Factor 1: Scale

Indicator	GREEN	YELLOW	RED
Class size	100+	25-100	<25
Geographic scope	National	Regional	Local
Identifiability	Records exist	Partial	Difficult

Quick Check: Are there 40+ identifiable potential class members?

---

Factor 2: Uniformity

Indicator	GREEN	YELLOW	RED
Defendant conduct	Identical	Similar	Varied
Policy/product	Single	Related	Different
Decision-making	Centralized	Regional	Individual

Quick Check: Did defendant do the same thing to everyone?

Red Flags:

• "It depends on each person's situation"
• Multiple product versions
• Case-by-case decisions

---

Factor 3: Provability

Indicator	GREEN	YELLOW	RED
Liability evidence	Documents	Expert testimony	Individual testimony
Causation	Direct/presumed	Inferential	Individual proof
Damages model	Formula	Model with inputs	Individual calc

Quick Check: Can we prove it with evidence that applies to everyone?

---

Factor 4: Economics

Indicator	GREEN	YELLOW	RED
Total damages	$10M+	$2-10M	<$2M
Per-person	<$5K	$5-75K	>$75K
Defendant resources	Deep pockets	Adequate	Limited

Sweet Spot: Per-person $50-$5,000, total $5M-$500M

Key Insight:

• Per-person >$75K → Individual suits better
• Per-person <$200 AND total <$1M → Economically unviable

---

Factor 5: Barriers

Barrier	GREEN	YELLOW	RED
Choice of law	Single state	Similar laws	Material conflicts
Individual defenses	None	Limited	Significant
Ascertainability	Objective	Affidavits needed	Subjective
Precedent	Favorable	Mixed	Adverse

---

Classification Rules

GREEN - Strong Candidate

All present:

• 100+ identifiable class members
• Uniform defendant conduct
• Common evidence proves liability
• Total damages >$5 million
• Per-person damages <$75K
• Defendant can pay
• No choice of law problems
• Favorable/neutral precedent

Routing: Proceed with intake. Run conflicts. Full Rule 23 analysis.

Typical GREEN Cases:

• Consumer product defect (thousands affected)
• Price-fixing with identifiable purchasers
• Uniform employment policy violation
• Standardized false advertising
• Data breach with ascertainable victims

---

YELLOW - Needs Investigation

One or more present:

• Class size 25-100 (borderline)
• Some conduct variation but core similarity
• Some individual issues but common questions dominate
• Total damages $2-5M (marginal economics)
• Per-person $5-75K (could go either way)
• Some choice of law complexity
• May need subclasses
• Mixed precedent

Routing: Investigate specific issues. Develop strategy before intake.

Common YELLOW Strategies:

• Narrow class definition
• Create subclasses for state laws
• Focus on 23(b)(2) if monetary damages problematic
• Consider state court filing

---

RED - Not Suitable for Class

One or more present:

• <25 potential class members
• Conduct varied significantly by person
• Liability requires individual proof
• Per-person damages >$100K
• Aggregate damages <$1M
• Defendant judgment-proof
• Insurmountable choice of law problems
• Strong adverse precedent
• Claims are fundamentally individual

Routing: Not a class action. Consider alternatives.

Alternative Strategies:

• Individual high-value litigation
• MDL consolidation (personal injury)
• Mass arbitration
• Government enforcement referral

---

Triage Decision Tree

START: New potential class action

Q1: 40+ potential class members?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q2: Same conduct to everyone?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q3: Common evidence proves liability?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q4: Total damages > $2 million?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q5: Per-person damages < $75K?
├─ NO → YELLOW (evaluate if class adds value)
└─ YES ↓

Q6: Significant certification barriers?
├─ YES → YELLOW (investigate)
└─ NO → GREEN (proceed)

---

Triage Output Format

## CLASS ACTION TRIAGE

**Matter**: [Description]
**Defendant**: [Name]
**Date**: [Date]

---

### CLASSIFICATION: [GREEN / YELLOW / RED]

---

### 5-FACTOR ASSESSMENT

| Factor | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Scale | G/Y/R | |
| Uniformity | G/Y/R | |
| Provability | G/Y/R | |
| Economics | G/Y/R | |
| Barriers | G/Y/R | |

---

### KEY FACTS

- **Potential class**: [Size and description]
- **Defendant conduct**: [What they did]
- **Harm**: [Type and magnitude]
- **Timeline**: [When]

---

### RATIONALE

[2-3 sentences explaining classification]

---

### NEXT STEPS

[GREEN]: Conflicts check → Full Rule 23 analysis → Intake memo

[YELLOW]:
1. [Issue to investigate]
2. [Issue to investigate]

[RED]: [Alternative recommendation]

---

Case Type Quick Reference

Case Type	Suitability	Key Factor
Consumer fraud	HIGH	Uniform misrepresentation
Data breach	HIGH	Ascertainable class
Price-fixing	HIGH	Economic analysis
Securities fraud	HIGH	Fraud-on-market
Wage/hour	HIGH	Common policies
Product defect (economic)	HIGH	Common defect
TCPA/Robocalls	HIGH	Statutory damages
Discrimination	MEDIUM	Post-Wal-Mart challenges
Product liability (injury)	LOW	Individual proof; use MDL
Contract disputes	LOW	Individual terms