verify

name	verify
license	MIT
compatibility	Claude Code 2.1.98+. Requires memory MCP server.
description	Comprehensive verification using parallel test agents for unit tests, integration tests, E2E validation, security scanning, and type checking. Runs coverage analysis, detects regressions, and validates against project conventions. Reports pass/fail with detailed findings and coverage deltas. Use when verifying implementations, validating changes after /ork:implement, or running pre-merge quality gates.
argument-hint	[feature-or-scope]
context	fork
version	4.3.0
author	OrchestKit
tags	["verification","testing","quality","validation","parallel-agents","grading"]
user-invocable	true
allowed-tools	["AskUserQuestion","Bash","Read","Write","Edit","Grep","Glob","Task","TaskCreate","TaskUpdate","TaskList","TaskStop","mcp__memory__search_nodes","mcp__agentation__agentation_get_all_pending","mcp__agentation__agentation_acknowledge","mcp__agentation__agentation_resolve","mcp__agentation__agentation_watch_annotations","ToolSearch","CronCreate","CronDelete","Monitor","PushNotification"]
skills	["code-review-playbook","testing-unit","testing-e2e","testing-llm","testing-integration","testing-perf","memory","quality-gates","chain-patterns","browser-tools"]
complexity	high
persuasion-type	discipline
effort	high
model	sonnet
hooks	{"PreToolUse":[{"matcher":"Bash","command":"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/bin/run-hook.mjs skill/test-framework-detector","once":true},{"matcher":"Agent","command":"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/bin/run-hook.mjs skill/verify-scoring-rubric-loader","once":true}]}
metadata	{"category":"workflow-automation","mcp-server":"memory"}
triggers	{"keywords":["verify","verifiy","validate","verification","ready for merge","check everything","security scan","give me a score","full verification","grade my"],"examples":["verify the authentication implementation","is this feature ready for merge? check everything","run tests, security scan, and give me a score"],"anti-triggers":["implement","build","fix","cover","generate tests","commit"]}

Verify Feature

Comprehensive verification using parallel specialized agents with nuanced grading (0-10 scale) and improvement suggestions.

Quick Start

/ork:verify authentication flow
/ork:verify --model=opus user profile feature
/ork:verify --scope=backend database migrations

Argument Resolution

SCOPE = "$ARGUMENTS"       # Full argument string, e.g., "authentication flow"
SCOPE_TOKEN = "$ARGUMENTS[0]"  # First token for flag detection (e.g., "--scope=backend")
# $ARGUMENTS[0], $ARGUMENTS[1] etc. for indexed access (CC 2.1.59)

# Model override detection (CC 2.1.72)
MODEL_OVERRIDE = None
for token in "$ARGUMENTS".split():
    if token.startswith("--model="):
        MODEL_OVERRIDE = token.split("=", 1)[1]  # "opus", "sonnet", "haiku"
        SCOPE = SCOPE.replace(token, "").strip()

Pass MODEL_OVERRIDE to all Agent() calls via model=MODEL_OVERRIDE when set. Accepts symbolic names (opus, sonnet, haiku) or full IDs (claude-opus-4-6) per CC 2.1.74.

Opus 4.6: Agents use native adaptive thinking (no MCP sequential-thinking needed). Extended 128K output supports comprehensive verification reports.

---

STEP 0: Effort-Aware Verification Scaling (CC 2.1.76)

Scale verification depth based on /effort level:

Effort Level	Phases Run	Agents	Output
low	Run tests only → pass/fail	0 agents	Quick check
medium	Tests + code quality + security	3 agents	Score + top issues
high (default)	All 8 phases + visual capture	6-7 agents	Full report + grades
xhigh (Opus 4.7 only, CC 2.1.111+)	All 8 phases + additional cross-file pattern sweep + self-verification pass	6-7 agents	Full report with uncertainty annotations

Override: Explicit user selection (e.g., "Full verification") overrides /effort downscaling.

STEP 0a: Verify User Intent with AskUserQuestion

BEFORE creating tasks, clarify verification scope:

AskUserQuestion(
  questions=[{
    "question": "What scope for this verification?",
    "header": "Scope",
    "options": [
      {"label": "Full verification (Recommended)", "description": "All tests + security + code quality + visual + grades", "markdown": "```\nFull Verification (10 phases)\n─────────────────────────────\n  7 parallel agents:\n  ┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐\n  │ Code       │ │ Security   │\n  │ Quality    │ │ Auditor    │\n  ├────────────┤ ├────────────┤\n  │ Test       │ │ Backend    │\n  │ Generator  │ │ Architect  │\n  ├────────────┤ ├────────────┤\n  │ Frontend   │ │ Performance│\n  │ Developer  │ │ Engineer   │\n  ├────────────┤ └────────────┘\n  │ Visual     │\n  │ Capture    │ → gallery.html\n  └────────────┘\n         ▼\n    Composite Score (0-10)\n    8 dimensions + Grade\n    + Visual Gallery\n```"},
      {"label": "Tests only", "description": "Run unit + integration + e2e tests", "markdown": "```\nTests Only\n──────────\n  npm test ──▶ Results\n  ┌─────────────────────┐\n  │ Unit tests     ✓/✗  │\n  │ Integration    ✓/✗  │\n  │ E2E            ✓/✗  │\n  │ Coverage       NN%  │\n  └─────────────────────┘\n  Skip: security, quality, UI\n  Output: Pass/fail + coverage\n```"},
      {"label": "Security audit", "description": "Focus on security vulnerabilities", "markdown": "```\nSecurity Audit\n──────────────\n  security-auditor agent:\n  ┌─────────────────────────┐\n  │ OWASP Top 10       ✓/✗ │\n  │ Dependency CVEs    ✓/✗ │\n  │ Secrets scan       ✓/✗ │\n  │ Auth flow review   ✓/✗ │\n  │ Input validation   ✓/✗ │\n  └─────────────────────────┘\n  Output: Security score 0-10\n          + vulnerability list\n```"},
      {"label": "Code quality", "description": "Lint, types, complexity analysis", "markdown": "```\nCode Quality\n────────────\n  code-quality-reviewer agent:\n  ┌─────────────────────────┐\n  │ Lint errors         N   │\n  │ Type coverage       NN% │\n  │ Cyclomatic complex  N.N │\n  │ Dead code           N   │\n  │ Pattern violations  N   │\n  └─────────────────────────┘\n  Output: Quality score 0-10\n          + refactor suggestions\n```"},
      {"label": "Quick check", "description": "Just run tests, skip detailed analysis", "markdown": "```\nQuick Check (~1 min)\n────────────────────\n  Run tests ──▶ Pass/Fail\n\n  Output:\n  ├── Test results\n  ├── Build status\n  └── Lint status\n  No agents, no grading,\n  no report generation\n```"}
    ],
    "multiSelect": true
  }]
)

Based on answer, adjust workflow:

• Full verification: All 10 phases (8 + 2.5 + 8.5), 7 parallel agents including visual capture
• Tests only: Skip phases 2 (security), 5 (UI/UX analysis)
• Security audit: Focus on security-auditor agent
• Code quality: Focus on code-quality-reviewer agent
• Quick check: Run tests only, skip grading and suggestions

---

STEP 0b: Select Orchestration Mode

Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/orchestration-mode.md") for env var check logic, Agent Teams vs Task Tool comparison, and mode selection rules.

Choose Agent Teams (mesh -- verifiers share findings) or Task tool (star -- all report to lead) based on the orchestration mode reference.

---

MCP Probe + Resume

# memory is alwaysLoad in .mcp.json (CC 2.1.121+, #1541) — probe below kept as fallback for older CC:
ToolSearch(query="select:mcp__memory__search_nodes")
Write(".claude/chain/capabilities.json", { memory, timestamp })

Read(".claude/chain/state.json")  # resume if exists

Handoff File

After verification completes, write results:

Write(".claude/chain/verify-results.json", JSON.stringify({
  "phase": "verify", "skill": "verify",
  "timestamp": now(), "status": "completed",
  "outputs": {
    "tests_passed": N, "tests_failed": N,
    "coverage": "87%", "security_scan": "clean"
  }
}))

Regression Monitor (CC 2.1.71)

Optionally schedule post-verification monitoring:

# Guard: Skip cron in headless/CI (CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_CRON)
# if env CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_CRON is set, run a single check instead
CronCreate(
  schedule="0 8 * * *",
  prompt="Daily regression check: npm test.
    If 7 consecutive passes → CronDelete.
    If failures → alert with details."
)

---

Task Management (CC 2.1.16)

# 1. Create main verification task
TaskCreate(
  subject="Verify [feature-name] implementation",
  description="Comprehensive verification with nuanced grading",
  activeForm="Verifying [feature-name] implementation"
)

# 2. Create subtasks for 8-phase process
TaskCreate(subject="Run code quality checks", activeForm="Running quality checks")    # id=2
TaskCreate(subject="Execute security audit", activeForm="Running security audit")     # id=3
TaskCreate(subject="Verify test coverage", activeForm="Verifying test coverage")      # id=4
TaskCreate(subject="Validate API", activeForm="Validating API")                       # id=5
TaskCreate(subject="Check UI/UX", activeForm="Checking UI/UX")                       # id=6
TaskCreate(subject="Calculate grades", activeForm="Calculating grades")               # id=7
TaskCreate(subject="Generate suggestions", activeForm="Generating suggestions")       # id=8
TaskCreate(subject="Compile report", activeForm="Compiling report")                   # id=9

# 3. Set dependencies — phases 2-6 run in parallel, 7-9 are sequential
TaskUpdate(taskId="7", addBlockedBy=["2", "3", "4", "5", "6"])  # Grading needs all checks
TaskUpdate(taskId="8", addBlockedBy=["7"])  # Suggestions need grades
TaskUpdate(taskId="9", addBlockedBy=["8"])  # Report needs suggestions

# 4. Before starting each task, verify it's unblocked
task = TaskGet(taskId="2")  # Verify blockedBy is empty

# 5. Update status as you progress
TaskUpdate(taskId="2", status="in_progress")  # When starting
TaskUpdate(taskId="2", status="completed")    # When done — repeat for each subtask

---

8-Phase Workflow

Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/verification-phases.md") for complete phase details, agent spawn definitions, Agent Teams alternative, and team teardown.

Phase	Activities	Output
1. Context Gathering	Git diff, commit history	Changes summary
2. Parallel Agent Dispatch	6 agents evaluate	0-10 scores
2.5 Visual Capture	Screenshot routes, AI vision eval	Gallery + visual score
3. Test Execution	Backend + frontend tests	Coverage data
4. Nuanced Grading	Composite score calculation	Grade (A-F)
5. Improvement Suggestions	Effort vs impact analysis	Prioritized list
6. Alternative Comparison	Compare approaches (optional)	Recommendation
7. Metrics Tracking	Trend analysis	Historical data
8. Report Compilation	Evidence artifacts + gallery.html	Final report
8.5 Agentation Loop	User annotates, ui-feedback fixes	Before/after diffs

Phase 2 Agents (Quick Reference)

Agent	Focus	Output
code-quality-reviewer	Lint, types, patterns	Quality 0-10
security-auditor	OWASP, secrets, CVEs	Security 0-10
test-generator	Coverage, test quality	Coverage 0-10
backend-system-architect	API design, async	API 0-10
frontend-ui-developer	React 19, Zod, a11y	UI 0-10
python-performance-engineer	Latency, resources, scaling	Performance 0-10

Launch ALL agents in ONE message with run_in_background=True and max_turns=25.

Progressive Output (CC 2.1.76+)

Output each agent's score as soon as it completes — don't wait for all 6-7 agents.

Focus mode (CC 2.1.101): In focus mode, include the full composite score, all dimension scores, and the verdict in your final message — the user didn't see the incremental outputs.

Security:     8.2/10 — No critical vulnerabilities found
Code Quality: 7.5/10 — 3 complexity hotspots identified
[...remaining agents still running...]

This gives users real-time visibility into multi-agent verification. If any dimension scores below the security_minimum threshold (default 5.0), flag it as a blocker immediately — the user can terminate early without waiting for remaining agents.

Monitor + Partial Results (CC 2.1.98)

Use Monitor for streaming test execution output from background scripts:

# Stream test output in real-time instead of waiting for completion
Bash(command="npm test 2>&1", run_in_background=true)
Monitor(pid=test_task_id)  # Each line → notification

Full pattern reference (when to use vs. TaskOutput, until-condition gates, anti-patterns): Read("/Users/yonatangross/coding/yonatangross/orchestkit/plugins/ork/skills/chain-patterns/references/monitor-patterns.md").

Partial results (CC 2.1.98): If a verification agent fails mid-analysis, synthesize partial scores rather than re-spawning:

for agent_result in verification_results:
    if "[PARTIAL RESULT]" in agent_result.output:
        # Extract whatever scores the agent produced before crashing
        partial_score = parse_score(agent_result.output)  # May be incomplete
        scores[agent_result.dimension] = {
            "score": partial_score, "partial": True,
            "note": "Agent crashed — score based on partial analysis"
        }
        # A 4-dimension score is better than no score. Do NOT re-spawn.

Phase 2.5: Visual Capture (NEW — runs in parallel with Phase 2)

Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/visual-capture.md") for auto-detection, route discovery, screenshot capture, and AI vision evaluation.

Summary: Auto-detects project framework, starts dev server, discovers routes, uses agent-browser to screenshot each route, evaluates with Claude vision, generates self-contained gallery.html with base64-embedded images.

Output: verification-output/{timestamp}/gallery.html — open in browser to see all screenshots with AI evaluations, scores, and annotation diffs.

Graceful degradation: If no frontend detected or server won't start, skips visual capture with a warning — never blocks verification.

Phase 8.5: Agentation Visual Feedback (opt-in)

Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/visual-capture.md") (Phase 8.5 section) for agentation loop workflow.

Trigger: Only when agentation MCP is configured. Offers user the choice to annotate the live UI. ui-feedback agent processes annotations, re-screenshots show before/after.

---

Grading & Scoring

Load Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/quality-gates/references/unified-scoring-framework.md") for dimensions, weights, grade thresholds, and improvement prioritization. Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/quality-model.md") for verify-specific extensions (Visual dimension). Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/grading-rubric.md") for per-agent scoring criteria.

---

Evidence & Test Execution

Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/evidence-collection.md") for git commands, test execution patterns, metrics tracking, and post-verification feedback.

---

Policy-as-Code

Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/policy-as-code.md") for configuration.

Define verification rules in .claude/policies/verification-policy.json:

{
  "thresholds": {
    "composite_minimum": 6.0,
    "security_minimum": 7.0,
    "coverage_minimum": 70
  },
  "blocking_rules": [
    {"dimension": "security", "below": 5.0, "action": "block"}
  ]
}

---

Report Format

Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/report-template.md") for full format. Summary:

# Feature Verification Report

**Composite Score: [N.N]/10** (Grade: [LETTER])

## Verdict
**[READY FOR MERGE | IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDED | BLOCKED]**

Push notifications (CC 2.1.110+): Verify runs for >5 min are common on complex changes. When the final verdict is ready, call PushNotification to alert the user — they likely walked away from the terminal. Requires Remote Control with "Push when Claude decides" config; fails silently for users without it.

PushNotification(
  title="ork:verify complete",
  body=f"{verdict} · {score}/10 · {blockers_count} blockers"
)

---

References

Load on demand with Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/<file>"):

File	Content
verification-phases.md	8-phase workflow, agent spawn definitions, Agent Teams mode
visual-capture.md	Phase 2.5 + 8.5: screenshot capture, AI vision, gallery generation, agentation loop
quality-model.md	Scoring dimensions and weights (8 unified)
grading-rubric.md	Per-agent scoring criteria
report-template.md	Full report format with visual evidence section
alternative-comparison.md	Approach comparison template
orchestration-mode.md	Agent Teams vs Task Tool
policy-as-code.md	Verification policy configuration
verification-checklist.md	Pre-flight checklist

Rules

Load on demand with Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/<file>"):

File	Content
scoring-rubric.md	Composite scoring, grades, verdicts
evidence-collection.md	Evidence gathering and test patterns

Verification Gate (Cross-Cutting)

Load Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/shared/rules/verification-gate.md") — the minimum 5-step gate that applies to ALL completion claims across all skills. This is non-negotiable: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE.

Anti-Sycophancy Protocol

Load Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/shared/rules/anti-sycophancy.md") — all verification agents report findings directly without performative agreement. "Should be fine" is not evidence. "Tests pass (exit 0, 47/47)" is.

Agent Status Protocol

All verification agents MUST report using the standardized protocol: Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/shared/status-protocol.md"). Never report DONE if concerns exist. Never silently produce work you're unsure about.

---

Agent Coordination

SendMessage (Cross-Agent Findings)

When a security agent finds a critical issue, share it with other verification agents:

SendMessage(to="test-generator", message="Security: SQL injection in user_service.py:88 — add parameterized query test")
SendMessage(to="code-quality-reviewer", message="Security finding at user_service.py:88 — flag in review")

Skill Chain

After verification, chain to commit if all gates pass:

TaskCreate(subject="Commit verified changes", activeForm="Committing", addBlockedBy=[verify_task_id])
# Then: /ork:commit

Session recovery (CC 2.1.108+): After idle periods or interruptions, use /recap to restore conversational context alongside checkpoint-resume state. Enabled by default since CC 2.1.110 (even with telemetry disabled).

Related Skills

• ork:implement - Full implementation with verification
• ork:review-pr - PR-specific verification
• testing-unit / testing-integration / testing-e2e - Test execution patterns
• ork:quality-gates - Quality gate patterns
• browser-tools - Browser automation for visual capture

---

Version: 4.2.0 (March 2026) — Added progressive output for incremental agent scores