with one click
plan-management
// This skill should be used when creating, reading, or updating devloop plans in .devloop/plan.md, task tracking, progress logs, phase management, PR feedback
// This skill should be used when creating, reading, or updating devloop plans in .devloop/plan.md, task tracking, progress logs, phase management, PR feedback
[HINT] Download the complete skill directory including SKILL.md and all related files
| name | plan-management |
| description | This skill should be used when creating, reading, or updating devloop plans in .devloop/plan.md, task tracking, progress logs, phase management, PR feedback |
| when_to_use | Creating or updating .devloop/plan.md, task tracking, phase management |
Conventions for .devloop/plan.md file format and updates.
Primary: .devloop/plan.md
# Devloop Plan: [Feature Name]
**Created**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Updated**: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM
**Status**: Planning | In Progress | Complete
**Issue**: #123 (https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123) (optional, if started from GH issue)
**Branch**: feat/feature-name (optional)
**PR**: https://github.com/.../pull/123 (after PR created)
## Overview
Brief description of the plan.
## Phase 1: [Phase Name]
- [ ] Task 1.1: Description
- Acceptance: Criteria
- Files: Expected files
## PR Feedback (after review)
PR #123 - @reviewer (CHANGES_REQUESTED)
### Blockers
- [ ] [PR-123-1] Fix issue (@reviewer)
### Suggestions
- [ ] [PR-123-2] Consider alternative (@reviewer)
## Progress Log
- [timestamp]: Event
| Marker | Meaning |
|---|---|
- [ ] | Pending |
- [x] | Completed |
- [~] | In progress |
- [!] | Blocked |
Format: [PR-{number}-{item}]
Example: [PR-123-1] = First feedback item from PR #123
Annotate tasks with model selection for optimized execution:
| Marker | When to Use | Examples |
|---|---|---|
[model:haiku] | Simple, mechanical, low-reasoning | Writing tests from patterns, docs, formatting, linting, config changes, file renames |
[model:sonnet] | Complex reasoning, multi-file coordination | Architecture, debugging, multi-file refactoring, security analysis, performance |
| (no annotation) | Orchestrator does inline | Single-line edits, running a command, status checks |
Place at the end of the task line:
- [ ] Task 1.1: Write unit tests for UserService [model:haiku]
- [ ] Task 1.2: Refactor authentication middleware [model:sonnet]
- [ ] Task 1.3: Update version in package.json
[parallel:A] - Can run concurrently with other Group A tasks[parallel:B] - Can run concurrently with other Group B tasks (etc.)[depends:N.M] - Must wait for Task N.M to complete firstTasks are parallel-safe when they:
Example:
## Phase 2: Implementation
- [ ] Task 2.1: Implement user model [model:sonnet] [parallel:A]
- [ ] Task 2.2: Write user model tests [model:haiku] [parallel:A]
- [ ] Task 2.3: Implement auth middleware [model:sonnet] [parallel:B]
- [ ] Task 2.4: Write auth middleware tests [model:haiku] [parallel:B]
- [ ] Task 2.5: Integration testing [model:sonnet] [depends:2.1] [depends:2.3]
Groups A and B run concurrently. Task 2.5 waits for both 2.1 and 2.3.
- [~]- [x]When using issue-driven development (configured in local.md):
Use /devloop:plan --from-issue 123 to fetch issue details and create a plan with:
**Issue**: #123 (URL) in the headerWhen all tasks are [x] and Issue is linked:
github.auto-close setting)**Issue**: #123 (https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123)
The number after # is parsed by archive-plan.sh for GitHub integration.
Epics use two files: .devloop/epic.json (state machine) and .devloop/epic.md (human-readable plan).
When a plan is promoted from an epic:
**Epic**: .devloop/epic.json
**Phase**: N
Default epic phases use TDD ordering: tests first ([parallel:A], [model:haiku]), then implementation ([depends:N.M], [model:sonnet]).