pr-review

name	pr-review
description	Thorough pull request review checklist and process
license	MIT
compatibility	opencode
metadata	{"audience":"reviewers","workflow":"github"}

What I do

• Guide a systematic PR review with a structured checklist
• Check for: code quality, tests, documentation, security, performance
• Provide a review summary in a format ready to paste as a PR comment

When to use me

Use this when reviewing a pull request. I'll help structure the review to be thorough and constructive.

Review Checklist

1. Purpose: Does the PR solve the stated problem? Is the scope reasonable?
2. Code Quality: Clean, readable, follows project conventions?
3. Tests: Are there tests? Do they cover edge cases? Do they pass?
4. Documentation: Updated if APIs changed? CHANGELOG entry if needed?
5. Security: Any new attack surface? Dependencies audited?
6. Performance: Any obvious bottlenecks? Unnecessary work?
7. Breaking Changes: Any breaking changes? Are they documented?