菜单
Profile and optimize performance — use when asked to self-perf, optimize performance, profile hot paths, speed this up, or "make it faster". Triggers the deterministic self-perf workflow (baseline → profile → optimize → verify improvement).
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Generate Architecture Decision Records — use when asked to document a decision, create an ADR, record why we chose X, or capture architectural rationale.
Generate documentation for code — use when asked to document a module, generate API docs, create a README for code, or write reference documentation. Triggers the deterministic doc-gen workflow (analyze → generate via documenter agent → write).
Check devkit health — which external CLIs (codex, gemini, gh, rtk, sg, gcli) are installed, which agents are available, which skills are ready to use. Use when asked about devkit health, devkit status, "is devkit working?", "what's installed?", "what devkit capabilities do I have?", diagnosing devkit setup issues, or running /devkit:health. Read-only diagnostic, safe to auto-invoke.
Fan-out PR review that runs BOTH `/devkit:tri-review` AND `/pr-review-toolkit:review-pr` in parallel for maximum coverage, then presents unified results — this skill does not compete with its sub-skills, it delegates to both simultaneously. Use when the user asks for "mega PR review", "mega-pr", "mega review", "full PR review with everything", "both review tools", "maximum coverage review", or explicitly wants every available reviewer looking at a change at once (Claude + Codex + Gemini model diversity PLUS specialized aspect reviewers like silent-failure-hunter, type-design-analyzer, test-analyzer, code-reviewer). Worth the extra cost when: the PR is high-stakes and the user wants every angle covered, or before merging a critical or hard-to-revert change. Do NOT use when the user only wants one review system (use tri-review or pr-review-toolkit:review-pr directly). Do NOT use for routine code review where a single reviewer suffices. This is deliberate overkill for when you want absolutely everything.
Generate a codebase onboarding guide — use when asked to explain this codebase, help understand the architecture, give a tour of the repo, or onboard a new contributor. Triggers the deterministic onboard workflow (analyze structure → architect via researcher agent → write guide).
Full end-to-end PR pipeline — validate → necessity-check → lint (loop) → test (loop) → security scan → doc-check → changelog → create-pr → monitor reviews (loop). Takes a branch from "code done" to "merged" with every gate enforced. Use when the user asks to "submit a PR", "open a pull request", "ship this", "make this PR-ready", "finalize this branch", or wants the full pipeline run end-to-end with CI monitoring and reviewer-comment handling automated. Worth the ceremony when: lint and test gates must pass before the PR opens, docs need syncing alongside code (README, ROADMAP, SKILL.md, workflows), security scan is required, or the user wants reviewer comments automatically classified and responded to. Do NOT use for a quick commit+push+PR without gates — use `/commit-commands:commit-push-pr` for that lighter path. Do NOT use when already mid-PR and just handling existing review comments in isolation. Do NOT use on the main branch or with uncommitted changes — the validate step will block you. This is devkit
| name | self-perf |
| description | Profile and optimize performance — use when asked to self-perf, optimize performance, profile hot paths, speed this up, or "make it faster". Triggers the deterministic self-perf workflow (baseline → profile → optimize → verify improvement). |
Deterministic performance optimization loop. Baseline → optimize hot paths → verify improvement → summary.
Use the devkit_start tool with workflow: "self-perf" and input: "{input}".
Then follow each step the engine returns. Call devkit_advance after completing each step. The engine controls step order, gates, and loops. Do NOT skip steps.
