| name | plan-review-gate |
| description | Adversarial plan review by 3 independent reviewers (Feasibility, Completeness, Scope & Alignment) before presenting to user. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, WebFetch, WebSearch, Agent, AskUserQuestion |
| graph | {"domains":["domain:software-engineering"],"skillAreas":["skill-area:agentic-loops","skill-area:orchestration-loop"],"workflows":["workflow:feature-development"],"topics":["topic:developer-experience"],"roles":["role:tech-lead","role:backend-engineer"]} |
- Before presenting a plan for user approval
- When validating work unit decomposition quality
Process
- Feasibility Reviewer - Can this plan actually be implemented? Technical viability, resource requirements, timeline reality
- Completeness Reviewer - Does the plan cover everything? Missing edge cases, untested paths, incomplete DoD items
- Scope & Alignment Reviewer - Does the plan match the issue? Scope creep detection, requirement traceability
All 3 must PASS before the plan is presented.
Key Rules
- Reviewers operate independently (no shared context)
- Each provides a binary PASS/FAIL verdict
- Findings include specific references to plan sections
- Failed plans require revision before re-review
Tool Use
Invoke as part of: methodologies/metaswarm/metaswarm-orchestrator (Phase 1b)