菜单
Multi-agent debate with visible transcripts where specialized agents respond to each other. USE WHEN council, debate, perspectives, weigh options, deliberate, multiple viewpoints, collaborative critique. Collaborative-adversarial — use Red Team for purely adversarial attack.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
USE WHEN improve prompt, write prompt, craft prompt, analyze prompt, prompt engineering, subagent prompts. Analyze, craft, and improve prompts using 19 research-backed techniques. Modes - Analyze (critique existing), Craft (build from scratch), Teach (explain techniques), Quick Fix (fast improvements).
Use when creating offers, pitches, pricing, guarantees, value propositions, or marketing copy - guides through Alex Hormozi's $100M Offers methodology including Value Equation optimization, MAGIC naming, guarantee frameworks, value stacking, and scarcity/urgency to create offers so compelling prospects feel irrational saying no
USE WHEN write tweet, Twitter thread, LinkedIn post, viral hook, edit tweet, analyze tweet, improve engagement, social media copy. Applies hook fundamentals (direct reader targeting, benefit-first, avoid overused patterns), engagement triggers (social proof, scarcity, low-friction CTA), and format discipline (one idea per tweet, short paragraphs). Includes in-genre examples and iterative editing guidance.
USE WHEN agent alignment, delegation alignment, agent handoff, multi-agent delegation, agent-to-agent task transfer. Structured AI-to-AI alignment protocol that prevents context compression loss, assumption stacking, and constraint evaporation during task delegation between agents.
USE WHEN negotiate, negotiation, salary, deal, difficult conversation, confrontation, give feedback, persuade, convince, influence, get buy-in, tactical empathy, voss, never split the difference, prepare for conversation, practice negotiation, roleplay negotiation, spar. Negotiation and communication expert using Chris Voss methodology. Two modes: Analyze (produces negotiation dossier) and Spar (roleplay counterpart with inline coaching).
Use when writing, reviewing, or reporting tests. Enforces trustworthy testing through the Testing Trophy strategy, 15 evidence-based principles, disciplined mocking, AI oracle prevention, anti-pattern detection, and honest execution reporting. Applies to unit, integration, and e2e test work.
| name | council |
| description | Multi-agent debate with visible transcripts where specialized agents respond to each other. USE WHEN council, debate, perspectives, weigh options, deliberate, multiple viewpoints, collaborative critique. Collaborative-adversarial — use Red Team for purely adversarial attack. |
Multi-agent debate system where specialized agents discuss topics in rounds, respond to each other's points, and surface insights through intellectual friction.
Key Differentiator from Red Team: Council is collaborative-adversarial (debate to find best path). Red Team is purely adversarial (attack the idea). Council produces visible conversation transcripts; Red Team produces steelman + counter-argument.
| Trigger | Workflow |
|---|---|
| Full structured debate (3 rounds, visible transcript) | workflows/Debate.md |
| Quick consensus check (1 round, fast) | workflows/Quick.md |
| Pure adversarial analysis | Red Team mode |
| Workflow | Purpose | Rounds | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debate | Full structured discussion | 3 | Complete transcript + synthesis |
| Quick | Fast perspective check | 1 | Initial positions only |
| File | Content |
|---|---|
CouncilMembers.md | Agent roles, perspectives, voice mapping |
RoundStructure.md | Three-round debate structure and timing |
OutputFormat.md | Transcript format templates |
Origin: Best decisions emerge from diverse perspectives challenging each other. Not just collecting opinions — genuine intellectual friction where experts respond to each other's actual points.
Speed: Parallel execution within rounds, sequential between rounds. A 3-round debate of 4 agents = 12 agent calls but only 3 sequential waits. Complete in 30-90 seconds.
"Council: Should we use WebSockets or SSE?"
→ Invokes Debate workflow → 3-round transcript
"Quick council check: Is this API design reasonable?"
→ Invokes Quick workflow → Fast perspectives
"Council with security: Evaluate this auth approach"
→ Debate with Security agent added
Works well with: