| name | stakeholder-map |
| description | Builds a Power × Interest stakeholder map and generates a communication plan per quadrant. Use when managing a complex launch, aligning cross-functional teams, or preparing stakeholder engagement strategy. Triggers on: stakeholder management, stakeholder map, stakeholder alignment, communication plan, power interest grid, cross-functional alignment, executive alignment, managing up. |
Stakeholder Map
Core Philosophy
Stakeholder management is not about making everyone happy — it's about preventing surprises. The most dangerous stakeholder is not the one who disagrees loudly; it's the one with high power who's been silent. By the time they speak up, it's too late to change course.
Map early. Communicate consistently. Find conflicts before launch, not during.
When to Use
- Before a major product launch or roadmap reveal
- When a project spans multiple teams or functions
- When an important stakeholder has gone quiet
- Before presenting to executives — to anticipate pushback and prepare
- When organizational dynamics are unclear for a new project
Workflow
1. List All Stakeholders
Include everyone who can affect or be affected by the outcome:
- Internal: Engineering leads, design, marketing, sales, legal, finance, data, executives
- External: Key customers, partners, regulators (if relevant)
Don't filter at this stage — over-listing is safer than missing someone.
2. Plot on the Power × Interest Grid
Power: Their ability to influence decisions, resources, or outcomes (High / Low)
Interest: How much the project directly affects them or how engaged they are (High / Low)
| High Interest | Low Interest |
|---|
| High Power | Manage Closely — Involve in decisions, update frequently, seek input early | Keep Satisfied — Periodic updates, only escalate critical issues |
| Low Power | Keep Informed — Regular status updates, invite to demos, gather feedback | Monitor — Light-touch updates, available on request |
3. Define a Communication Strategy Per Quadrant
Manage Closely (High Power / High Interest)
- Frequency: Weekly or per major milestone
- Format: 1:1 or small group; decision-required meetings
- Goal: No surprises; their concerns are surfaced and resolved before they escalate
- Risk if neglected: Can block or kill the project
Keep Satisfied (High Power / Low Interest)
- Frequency: Bi-weekly or monthly
- Format: Short written update or exec summary; async preferred
- Goal: Awareness without overwhelming them
- Risk if neglected: Uninformed power = surprise veto
Keep Informed (Low Power / High Interest)
- Frequency: Weekly progress updates or sprint demos
- Format: Email update, Slack channel, or demo invite
- Goal: Keep them engaged; they often surface operational risks you'd miss
- Risk if neglected: Creates perception that you're hiding things
Monitor (Low Power / Low Interest)
- Frequency: Monthly or quarterly newsletter/update
- Format: Broadcast communication
- Goal: Available and informed; no action required
- Risk if neglected: Low — but they can shift to other quadrants if the project affects them more than expected
4. Identify Conflicts
Map stakeholders who have competing interests. These are your highest-risk relationships:
- Stakeholder A wants fast launch; Stakeholder B wants 3 months of QA
- Stakeholder A owns budget; Stakeholder B owns timeline
For each conflict: identify the decision that will resolve it, who needs to make that call, and when.
5. Build the Communication Plan
Translate the grid into a concrete schedule.
Output Format
## Stakeholder Map — [Project Name]
### Power × Interest Grid
**Manage Closely**
- [Name] — [Role] — Why: [reason for high power + interest]
- ...
**Keep Satisfied**
- [Name] — [Role] — Why: [reason]
**Keep Informed**
- [Name] — [Role] — Why: [reason]
**Monitor**
- [Name] — [Role] — Why: [reason]
### Communication Plan
| Stakeholder | Quadrant | Frequency | Format | Key Message | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
### Conflict Map
- [Stakeholder A] vs [Stakeholder B]: [Competing interest] → [Resolution path]
Antipatterns
- Mapping without acting: A stakeholder map that lives in a document nobody reads. The value is in the weekly communication cadence it drives, not the map itself.
- Flattering the org chart: Assuming formal seniority = high power. The real power holders are often not the ones with the biggest titles.
- Static maps: Stakeholder power and interest shift as projects progress. Update the map after major milestones or organizational changes.
- Ignoring the Monitor quadrant: Low-power / low-interest stakeholders can shift quadrants when projects affect them. Keep a light but consistent pulse.
- Over-communicating to everyone: Sending the same detailed update to all quadrants wastes their time and yours. Tailor depth to the quadrant.
