一键导入
review-fix-loop
Use this skill when addressing review findings from the reviewer-agent. Maps every finding to a specific code change and verification evidence.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Use this skill when addressing review findings from the reviewer-agent. Maps every finding to a specific code change and verification evidence.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
Use this skill after problem framing to produce a locked architecture document. Creates data flow diagrams, state machines, error paths, test matrices, and bite-sized task breakdowns.
Design + accessibility skill for ASU UI work (WCAG 2.1 AA). Use when designing, building, or reviewing any ASU component or page in Unity or Webspark. Covers semantics/landmarks, keyboard + focus, contrast, reflow at 320px, forced-colors mode, labels/forms, and a pre-delivery checklist. Prefer Unity/Bootstrap components over hand-rolled div+ARIA.
Evaluate code structure, maintainability, and engineering standards alongside adversarial review.
Phase 3 of code review: run tests, verify behavior, check edge cases, confirm no regressions.
Use during REVIEW to compare a rendered UI component against its design references (screenshots in .intake/ and/or the Figma frame). Drives a running Storybook (Unity) or local Webspark page with agent-browser to screenshot the build at multiple viewports, then reports P1/P2/P3 visual-fidelity findings to .pipeline/visual-report.md. Used by the acp-visual agent.
Use at the END of the Unity stage to enforce the PR-ready gate and write the cross-stage handoff. Defines the gate (build+lint, Storybook story + interaction/a11y tests, HTML-parity) and writes handoff.json (+ markup.html) to the shared peer handoff/ directory, keyed by Jira key or component slug, for the Webspark stage to consume. Validate with .kiro/scripts/validate-handoff.sh.
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | review-fix-loop |
| description | Use this skill when addressing review findings from the reviewer-agent. Maps every finding to a specific code change and verification evidence. |
Close review rounds systematically by mapping every finding to a code change and proof.
Build this before making any changes:
| # | Finding | Severity | Type | File(s) | Planned Fix | Evidence Type | Verify Command | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [desc] | P1 | AUTO | [path] | [what] | [type] | [cmd] |
Evidence types: red-test, green-test, lint, typecheck, integration, contract, manual-inspection, not-run-with-risk
Fill the Result column AFTER each fix is verified. A finding is not closed by prose — it is closed by code change plus evidence. For test-fidelity findings, closure must include either improved behavior test, reduced mock coupling, fake/contract/integration coverage, or documented justification for current test double.
Work from narrow to broad:
Do NOT guess — batch them and report to the orchestrator with your analysis and recommendation.
## Review Fix Report
**Findings addressed:** N of M
**Closure table:** [completed table]
**Verification evidence:** [commands and results]
**Open items:** [ASK/INVESTIGATE items pending]
**Residual risk:** [anything needing follow-up]