review

name	review
description	Transversal skill for reviewing AI-generated documents using the AI Fluency Framework (4Ds: Delegation, Description, Discernment, Diligence). Guides the human reviewer with structured questions to evaluate quality, accuracy, and completeness of any document produced by this plugin.
allowed-tools	[]

Review — AI Fluency Document Review

When to use

• After ANY skill generates a document, before publishing to TM
• When the user asks to review or validate existing documentation
• As part of gate approval (Gate 0, 1, 2) — each gate requires human review

How it works

This skill is purely instructional — it does not call any tools. It provides a structured framework for the human to evaluate AI-generated content before approval.

Present the review checklist (see review-checklist.md) adapted to the specific document type being reviewed.

Review flow

1. Present the document — Show the generated content to the user
2. Apply the 4Ds checklist — Walk through each dimension with the user
3. Collect feedback — Record what needs to change
4. Iterate — Regenerate or edit based on feedback
5. Get approval — Explicit "approved" from the user before publishing

The 4Ds applied to document review

Delegation (¿Se delegó bien?)

• Was the right task given to the AI?
• Is the scope appropriate for AI generation?
• Are there parts that should have been written by a human instead?

Description (¿Se describió bien?)

• Was the input/context sufficient for a good output?
• Did the AI have enough information about the project?
• Are there missing inputs that would improve the result?

Discernment (¿Se evaluó bien?)

• Is the information accurate and complete?
• Are there incorrect assumptions?
• Does the content match the project's real context?
• Are there hallucinated details?

Diligence (¿Se documentó bien?)

• Is it clear what was AI-generated vs human-decided?
• Does the AI transparency footer exist?
• Are decisions and rationale properly recorded?

Adapting to document type

Document	Focus areas
Project Charter	Objectives are SMART, scope is realistic, budget is accurate
SOW	Deliverables are measurable, timeline is feasible
Stakeholder Register	All key stakeholders included, influence levels accurate
RACI	No missing roles, no tasks without a Responsible
Discovery Report	Problem statement accurate, user research reflects reality
Architecture	Components are correct, integrations exist, no fantasy APIs
PRD	Requirements are testable, priorities reflect real needs

Output

This skill produces no artifacts. Its output is the user's approval or feedback on the document being reviewed.