用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market --skill skills-eval命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | skills-eval |
| description | Evaluate Claude skill quality through auditing. Use when reviewing or auditing skills. |
| alwaysApply | false |
| category | skill-management |
| tags | ["evaluation","improvement","skills","optimization","quality-assurance","tool-use","performance-metrics"] |
| dependencies | ["modular-skills","performance-optimization"] |
| tools | [] |
| provides | {"infrastructure":["evaluation-framework","quality-assurance","improvement-planning"],"patterns":["skill-analysis","token-optimization","modular-design"],"sdk_features":["agent-sdk-compatibility","advanced-metrics","dynamic-discovery"]} |
| estimated_tokens | 1800 |
| usage_patterns | ["skill-audit","quality-assessment","improvement-planning","skills-inventory","tool-performance-evaluation","dynamic-discovery-optimization","advanced-tool-use-analysis","programmatic-calling-efficiency","context-preservation-quality","token-efficiency-optimization","modular-architecture-validation","integration-testing","compliance-reporting","performance-benchmarking"] |
| complexity | advanced |
| model_hint | deep |
| evaluation_criteria | {"structure_compliance":25,"metadata_quality":20,"token_efficiency":25,"tool_integration":20,"claude_sdk_compliance":10} |
| modules | ["modules/advanced-tool-use-analysis.md","modules/authoring-checklist.md","modules/evaluation-criteria.md","modules/evaluation-framework.md","modules/evaluation-workflows.md","modules/integration-testing.md","modules/integration.md","modules/performance-benchmarking.md","modules/pressure-testing.md","modules/trigger-isolation-analysis.md","modules/troubleshooting.md","modules/skill-authoring-best-practices.md"] |
| role | entrypoint |
abstract:skill-authoring)abstract:hooks-eval)abstract:rules-eval)This framework audits Claude skills against quality standards to improve performance and reduce token consumption. Automated tools analyze skill structure, measure context usage, and identify specific technical improvements. Run verification commands after each audit to confirm fixes work correctly.
The skills-auditor provides structural analysis, while the improvement-suggester ranks fixes by impact. Compliance is verified through the compliance-checker. Runtime efficiency is monitored by tool-performance-analyzer and token-usage-tracker.
Run a full audit of all skills or target a specific file to identify structural issues.
# Audit all skills
make audit-all
# Audit specific skill
make audit-skill TARGET=path/to/skill/SKILL.md
Use skill_analyzer.py for complexity checks and token_estimator.py to verify the context budget.
make analyze-skill TARGET=path/to/skill/SKILL.md
make estimate-tokens TARGET=path/to/skill/SKILL.md
Generate a prioritized plan and verify standards compliance using improvement_suggester.py and compliance_checker.py.
make improve-skill TARGET=path/to/skill/SKILL.md
make check-compliance TARGET=path/to/skill/SKILL.md
Start with make audit-all to inventory skills and identify high-priority targets. For each skill requiring attention, run analysis with analyze-skill to map complexity. Generate an improvement plan, apply fixes, and run to verify the skill meets project standards. Finalize by checking the token budget for efficiency.
check-complianceQuality assessments use the skills-auditor and improvement-suggester to generate detailed reports. Performance analysis focuses on token efficiency through the token-usage-tracker and tool performance via tool-performance-analyzer. For standards compliance, the compliance-checker automates common fixes for structural issues.
We evaluate skills across five dimensions: structure compliance, content quality, token efficiency, activation reliability, and tool integration. Scores above 90 represent production-ready skills, while scores below 50 indicate critical issues requiring immediate attention.
Improvements are prioritized by impact. Critical issues include security vulnerabilities or broken functionality. High-priority items cover structural flaws that hinder discoverability. Medium and low priorities focus on best practices and minor optimizations.
Deprecated: skills/shared/modules/ directories. Shared modules must be relocated into the consuming skill's own modules/ directory. The evaluator flags any remaining skills/shared/ as a structural warning.
Current: Each skill owns its modules at skills/<skill-name>/modules/. Cross-skill references use relative paths (e.g., ../skill-authoring/modules/anti-rationalization.md).
modules/trigger-isolation-analysis.mdmodules/authoring-checklist.mdmodules/evaluation-workflows.mdmodules/advanced-tool-use-analysis.mdmodules/evaluation-framework.mdmodules/integration.mdmodules/troubleshooting.mdmodules/pressure-testing.mdmodules/integration-testing.mdmodules/performance-benchmarking.mdscripts/ directory.scripts/automation/.skills/shared/ module reference is listed as a structural
warning in the audit output.make check-compliance TARGET=<skill> exits 0 for skills reported as passing, confirming
the compliance-checker agrees with the audit score.