菜单
Hunts bugs with evidence trails. Use when investigating unexpected behavior or before merging code with potential hidden defects.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market --skill bug-review命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
基于 SOC 职业分类
Turn hunches into accepted results: worthiness score, evidence bar, research-to-rules. Use when vetting ideas. Not for QA; use night-market-validation-and-qa.
Generates and self-executes a diff-derived test plan for a PR. Use when validating PR changes before merge. Do not use for code review; use sanctum:pr-review.
Curate the web-capture index. Use when the capture backlog grows, captures sit unprocessed at seedling/pending, or to surface stored research during work.
| name | bug-review |
| role | library |
| description | Hunts bugs with evidence trails. Use when investigating unexpected behavior or before merging code with potential hidden defects. |
| alwaysApply | false |
| category | code-review |
| tags | ["bugs","defects","debugging","code-quality","fixes","verification"] |
| tools | [] |
| usage_patterns | ["bug-hunting","defect-documentation","fix-preparation","verification-planning"] |
| complexity | intermediate |
| model_hint | standard |
| estimated_tokens | 450 |
| progressive_loading | true |
| dependencies | ["imbue:proof-of-work","imbue:diff-analysis/modules/risk-assessment-framework","imbue:review-core","imbue:structured-output"] |
| modules | ["modules/defect-documentation.md","modules/fix-preparation.md","modules/language-detection.md"] |
bug-review:language-detected)bug-review:repro-plan)bug-review:defects-documented)bug-review:fixes-prepared)bug-review:verification-plan)Systematic bug identification and fixing with language-specific expertise.
/bug-review
Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.
bug-review:language-detectedbug-review:repro-planbug-review:defects-documentedbug-review:fixes-preparedbug-review:verification-planbug-review:findings-verifiedLoad additional context as needed:
@include modules/language-detection.md - Manifest heuristics, expertise framing, version constraints@include modules/defect-documentation.md - Severity classification, root cause analysis, static analyzers@include modules/fix-preparation.md - Minimal patches, idiomatic patterns, test coveragebug-review:language-detected)Identify dominant languages using manifest files (Cargo.toml → Rust, package.json → Node, etc.).
State expertise persona appropriate for the language ecosystem.
Note version constraints (MSRV, Python versions, Node engines).
Progressive: Load modules/language-detection.md for detailed manifest heuristics.
bug-review:repro-plan)Identify reproduction methods:
Document exact commands:
cargo test -p core
pytest tests/test_api.py
npm test -- pkg
Verification: Run pytest -v tests/test_api.py to verify.
Capture blockers and propose mocks when dependencies unavailable.
bug-review:defects-documented)Review code line-by-line, logging each bug with:
Run static analyzers (cargo clippy, ruff check, golangci-lint, eslint).
Use imbue:proof-of-work for reproducible capture.
Progressive: Load modules/defect-documentation.md for classification details and analyzer commands.
bug-review:fixes-prepared)Draft minimal, idiomatic patches using language best practices:
Create tests following Red → Green pattern:
Progressive: Load modules/fix-preparation.md for language-specific patterns and test strategies.
bug-review:verification-plan)Execute reproduction steps with fixes applied.
Capture evidence:
Document remaining risks using imbue:diff-analysis/modules/risk-assessment-framework.
Assign owners and deadlines for follow-up items.
bug-review:findings-verified)Every defect must cite a real file:line and a verbatim Anchor. Write
findings to .review/findings.json and confirm each citation resolves:
python plugins/imbue/scripts/citation_verifier.py \
--findings .review/findings.json --repo-root .
Drop or label UNVERIFIED any defect the verifier fails (exit 1); only
verified defects enter the report. See Skill(imbue:review-core) Step 5
for the protocol and Skill(imbue:structured-output) for the schema.
Severity: Critical (crash/data loss) → High (broken features) → Medium (degraded UX) → Low (edge cases)
Root Causes: Logic errors | API misuse | Concurrency issues | Resource leaks | Validation gaps
## Summary
[Brief scope description]
## Defects Found
### [D1] file.rs:142 - Title
- Severity: High
- Anchor: `verbatim source text at file.rs:142`
- Root Cause: Logic error
- Impact: Data corruption possible
- Fix: [description]
## Proposed Fixes
### Fix for D1
[code diff with explanation]
## Test Updates
[new/updated tests with Red → Green verification]
## Evidence
- Commands executed
- Logs and outputs
- External references
Verification: Run pytest -v to verify tests pass.
file:line + verbatim Anchor, and citation_verifier.py confirmed all citations (exit 0) or unverified defects were dropped or labeled UNVERIFIED