菜单
Comprehensive Polish plot evaluation with full due diligence (~20-30 min). Use when user wants deep analysis of a property listing after initial triage, or needs complete risk assessment for a finalist plot.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | plot-analysis |
| description | Comprehensive Polish plot evaluation with full due diligence (~20-30 min). Use when user wants deep analysis of a property listing after initial triage, or needs complete risk assessment for a finalist plot. |
| argument-hint | ["Otodom-URL|listing-URL"] |
| allowed-tools | WebFetch, WebSearch, Read, Grep |
Comprehensive evaluation for 2-3 finalist plots before site visits.
Fetch listing and load regional benchmarks from KB files.
Key files:
findings/home-building-poland/finding-building-plot-poland-guide.md (lines 337-347: price benchmarks, 161-168: utility costs)findings/home-building-poland/research-building-house-vs-buying-flat-poland-krakow.md (lines 13-21: construction costs, 131: hidden costs)See data-extraction.md for detailed extraction checklist.
Verify KW (Księga Wieczysta) sections I-IV and MPZP status.
Critical checks:
See legal-zoning.md for KW analysis guide and MPZP symbols.
Calculate true total cost including utilities, construction, hidden costs.
Cost formula:
Land + tax (2%) + notary (~2k)
+ Utilities (0-50k+ depending on status)
+ Construction (120m² × 5,875 PLN/m² = ~705k)
+ Hidden costs (25-40% = ~211k)
= Total ~900k-1,100k PLN
See infrastructure-costs.md for detailed projections.
Evaluate 4 risk categories: Environmental, Financial, Legal, Technical.
Auto-reject conditions:
See risk-assessment.md for full risk matrix.
Evaluate against personal criteria: transport, woods proximity, buildability.
Must-haves:
See personal-fit.md for transport ratings and scoring.
Use template in output-templates.md for final report structure.
Verdict options: STRONG BUY / CONDITIONAL BUY / PASS
Before submitting:
Search multiple job sources for new listings, spawn parallel triage agents, and update tracking state. Use when running /job-discover or searching for new job opportunities.
Staff-engineer-level ADR helper — interactive multi-round exploration that helps you deeply understand architecture decisions through codebase research, ASCII diagrams, and Socratic dialogue. Use when you want to understand an ADR ("explain this ADR", "help me understand this decision", "what does this mean", "walk me through this"), review it ("is this ADR good enough", "poke holes", "review this ADR"), or when sharing ADR file paths (docs/decisions/, docs/adr/, numbered files like 0014-*.md). Every round produces diagrams and ends with user-directed next steps.
Curate weekly newsletter from checked stories in daily AI digests. Extracts [x] marked items, groups into narrative themes, generates editorial newsletter.
Comprehensive grounded research with rigorous source verification. Use when user needs thorough research with verbatim citations, fact-checking verification, or academic-level source grounding on complex topics.
Interactive KubeCon CFP submission writer. Guides through topic selection, title crafting, abstract writing, and benefits section using acceptance data from 1,100+ talks across 7 KubeCon events (2024-2025). Use when preparing a conference talk proposal for KubeCon/CloudNativeCon, writing a CFP, or asking about KubeCon submission strategy.
Critique a Claude implementation plan before approving execution. Spawns parallel persona subagents (Skeptic, Architect, Verifier) to evaluate the plan against the codebase and return an Approve/Reject/Refine verdict with concrete refinements. Use when a plan has been generated (Plan Mode output, ExitPlanMode, pasted plan text, or plan file path) and needs review before code is written. Triggers on "critique this plan", "review this plan", "is this plan good", "poke holes in this plan", "should I approve this plan", or sharing a plan for evaluation.