一键导入
plan-fork
Merge two independent implementation plan drafts into one clean Sybra plan. Use when given two plan file paths and an optional --task/--out.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Merge two independent implementation plan drafts into one clean Sybra plan. Use when given two plan file paths and an optional --task/--out.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Review what shipped in the OpenAI Codex CLI since the last adoption analysis and file an umbrella issue (☂️) + one subissue per adoptable feature, each grounded in how Sybra actually drives Codex headless. Use when asked to "check what's new in Codex", "adopt new Codex features", or to refresh the Codex CLI adoption tracker. For Claude Code, use claude-feature-adoption instead.
Fast adversarial code review. Red-teams a diff or PR to find the concrete bug, then refutes its own findings to cut false positives. Works with Claude, Codex, or Copilot — uses subagents when the runtime has them, falls back to sequential local passes. Use for routine changes where a full staff review is overkill.
Review what shipped in the OpenAI Codex CLI since the last adoption analysis and file an umbrella issue (☂️) + one subissue per adoptable feature, each grounded in how Sybra actually drives Codex headless. Use when asked to "check what's new in Codex", "adopt new Codex features", or to refresh the Codex CLI adoption tracker. For Claude Code, use claude-feature-adoption instead.
Non-interactive PR review fix — fetch unresolved review threads, auto-apply valid fixes, reply on every thread (applied/questionable/invalid). Use when given a PR URL and asked to address review feedback without prompts.
Analyze Sybra health findings + audit summary to explain workflow issues and propose grounded fixes. Use when asked to review how work is flowing or suggest process improvements.
Analyze the Sybra evaluation scorecard, breakdowns, and weaknesses, then recommend concrete improvements toward an autonomous mid-level engineering team. Use when asked how well/efficiently Sybra is working, to review the evaluation data, or to act on the fleet scorecard.
| name | plan-fork |
| description | Merge two independent implementation plan drafts into one clean Sybra plan. Use when given two plan file paths and an optional --task/--out. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, Bash, Skill |
| user-invocable | true |
Synthesize two independent plan drafts into one canonical implementation plan.
You are a convergence step. Do not implement code. Do not modify task status.
Invocation shape:
/plan-fork <plan-a-path> <plan-b-path> --task <task-id> --out <output-path>
$plan-fork <plan-a-path> <plan-b-path> --task <task-id> --out <output-path>
--task is the canonical Sybra task ID.--out is where to write the synthesized plan. If omitted, print the plan.--task ID when a task ID is provided./plan-critic if available.$plan-critic if available.--out when provided.## Goal
<one concise paragraph>
## Scope
- <included work>
- <excluded work if important>
## Implementation
1. <step>
- Files: `<path>`
- Details: <specific symbols/changes>
- Verify: `<command>` -> <expected result>
## Risks
- <risk or "None">
## Open Questions
- <question or "None">
sybra-cli update.--task value.