| name | documentdb-query-optimizer |
| description | Help with DocumentDB/MongoDB query optimization and indexing for Azure DocumentDB. Use only when the user asks for optimization or performance: "How do I optimize this query?", "How do I index this?", "Why is this query slow?", "Can you fix my slow queries?", etc. Do not invoke for general query writing unless user asks for performance or index help. Prefer indexing as optimization strategy. Use DocumentDB MCP when available. |
| allowed-tools | mcp__documentdb__* |
DocumentDB Query Optimizer
When This Skill Is Invoked
Invoke only when the user wants:
- Query/index optimization or performance help
- Why a query is slow or how to speed it up
- Slow queries on their cluster and/or how to optimize them
- Index recommendations or index review
Do not invoke for routine query authoring unless the user has requested help
with optimization, slow queries, or indexing.
High Level Workflow
Help with a Specific Query
If the user is asking about a particular query:
- Use
list_indexes to get existing indexes on the collection
- Use
optimize_find_query (for find queries) or explain_aggregate_query
(for aggregation pipelines) to get explain output with execution stats
- Use
find_documents with limit=1 to fetch a sample document to understand the
schema
Then make an optimization suggestion based on collected information and best
practices from the reference files. Prefer creating an index that fully covers
the query if possible.
General Performance Help
If the user wants to examine slow queries or is looking for general performance
suggestions (not regarding any particular query):
- Use
list_databases and get_db_info to understand the database structure
- Use
collection_stats to identify large collections
- Use
index_stats to check existing index usage
- Use
current_ops to see currently running operations
- Suggest reviewing the most-used collections for missing indexes
MCP Tools Available
Database tools (for query optimization):
| Tool name (exact) | Description |
|---|
list_indexes | List all indexes on a collection — check if the query can use an existing index |
optimize_find_query | Run explain with executionStats for a find query, returning metrics, plan shape, index stats, and collection stats in one call |
explain_aggregate_query | Run explain with executionStats for an aggregation pipeline |
explain_find_query | Run explain for a find query (lower-level than optimize_find_query) |
explain_count_query | Run explain for a count query |
find_documents | Fetch sample documents to understand schema — use with limit=1 |
collection_stats | Get collection statistics (size, document count, storage) |
index_stats | Get index usage statistics ($indexStats) |
current_ops | Get currently running database operations |
create_index | Create a new index (only after user approval) |
drop_index | Drop an existing index (only after user approval) |
Load References
Before beginning diagnosis and recommendation, load reference files.
Always load:
references/core-indexing-principles.md
Diagnostic Workflow
Step 1: Gather Information
For a specific query, run these tools (when MCP is connected):
list_indexes({ db_name: "<db>", collection_name: "<coll>" })
optimize_find_query({
db_name: "<db>",
collection_name: "<coll>",
query: <filter>,
options: { sort: <sort>, projection: <projection>, limit: <n> }
})
For aggregation pipelines:
explain_aggregate_query({
db_name: "<db>",
collection_name: "<coll>",
pipeline: <pipeline_array>
})
Step 2: Analyze Explain Output
From the optimize_find_query / explain_aggregate_query response, extract:
- metrics:
totalKeysExamined, totalDocsExamined, nReturned,
executionTimeMillis
- plan_shape: winning plan stage (IXSCAN vs COLLSCAN), index used
- indexes_stats: which indexes exist and their usage frequency
- collection_stats: total document count, average document size
Key ratios to evaluate:
| Metric | Good | Bad |
|---|
| keysExamined / nReturned | Close to 1 | >> 1 (poor selectivity) |
| docsExamined / nReturned | Close to 1 | >> 1 (scanning too many docs) |
| Plan stage | IXSCAN | COLLSCAN (no index) |
| Sort stage | In-memory: false | In-memory: true (blocking sort) |
Step 3: Diagnose
Common issues and their root causes:
- COLLSCAN → No index supports the query filter. Create an index on
the filter fields.
- High keysExamined vs nReturned → Index exists but has poor selectivity.
Consider a more selective compound index.
- In-memory sort → Sort field is not indexed. Add sort field to the index
(after equality fields, before range fields).
- Large docsExamined → Index doesn't cover the query. Consider a covering
index that includes projected fields.
Step 4: Recommend
Follow the ESR Rule (Equality → Sort → Range) for compound index design:
- Equality fields first (fields with
$eq / exact match)
- Sort fields next (fields in the
sort specification)
- Range fields last (fields with
$gt, $lt, $gte, $lte, $in)
Example:
Query: db.orders.find({status: 'shipped', region: 'US'}).sort({date: -1})
Recommended index: {status: 1, region: 1, date: -1}
(Two equality fields, then sort field)
Step 5: Verify (Optional)
After creating the recommended index, re-run the explain to confirm improvement:
- Create the index (with user approval)
- Re-run
optimize_find_query with the same query
- Compare metrics before and after
Example Workflow
User: "Why is this query slow?
db.orders.find({status: 'shipped', region: 'US'}).sort({date: -1})"
If MCP connection is available, run steps 1–3:
-
Check existing indexes:
- Call
list_indexes with database=store, collection=orders
- Result shows:
{_id: 1}, {status: 1}, {date: -1}
-
Run explain:
- Call
optimize_find_query with query={status: 'shipped', region: 'US'},
options={sort: {date: -1}}
- Result: Uses
{status: 1} index, then in-memory SORT,
totalKeysExamined: 50000, nReturned: 100
-
Fetch sample:
- Call
find_documents with limit=1 to understand the schema
-
Diagnose: This query targets 100 docs but scans 50K index entries (poor
selectivity: 0.002). In-memory sort adds overhead. The {status: 1} index
doesn't support both filter fields or sort.
-
Recommend: Create compound index {status: 1, region: 1, date: -1}
following ESR (two equality fields, then sort). This eliminates in-memory
sort and improves selectivity.
Azure DocumentDB Specifics
- Index types supported: Single field, compound, text, geospatial
(2dsphere), wildcard, unique
- Default _id index: Every collection has an automatic
_id index
- Compound index limit: Check current Azure documentation for maximum
number of fields in a compound index
- Index builds: Index creation on Azure DocumentDB may take time for large collections;
the operation runs in the background
- Covered queries: Azure DocumentDB supports covered queries (index-only scans) when
all queried and projected fields are in the index
- Vector search: Azure DocumentDB supports vector indexes (IVF, HNSW) for similarity
search. If IVF recall is poor, recommend switching to HNSW.
Output Format
- Keep answers short and clear: a few sentences on index and optimization
suggestions, and reasoning behind them
- Focus on highest-impact optimizations first
- Do not use strong language like "You should definitely create these indexes"
— explain they are suggestions with reasoning
- Consider how many indexes already exist — there shouldn't generally be
more than 20
- Do not create or drop indexes directly via MCP unless the user gives approval
- Present before/after metrics when possible
Safety Rules
- NEVER create or drop indexes without explicit user approval
- Always explain what the index change will do and why before asking for
approval
- If the collection has many existing indexes (>15), warn about the overhead of
adding more
- For drop recommendations, explain the impact on other queries that may use
the index