wiki-editorial-review

name	wiki-editorial-review
description	Review wiki pages for quality — citation coverage, claim accuracy, staleness, cross-links
triggers	["wiki-editorial-review","wiki editorial-review"]

What This Does

Performs a structured editorial pass on one or more wiki pages: citation grounding, claim currency, cross-link completeness, and schema compliance. Produces a ranked list of issues with suggested remediation.

Reference conventions: WIKI.md § 12.2 (lint checks), § 7 (synthesis pages), § 6 (citations).

Usage

/wiki-editorial-review wiki/concepts/food-noise.md
/wiki-editorial-review --domain glp1          # Review all glp1-tagged pages

Execution Steps

1. Run lint on the target scope:

   .venv/bin/wiki lint [--scope <check>]
   

   Focus on: citation-density, stale-claims, orphans, broken-wikilinks, schema-drift.

2. Read target pages: For each flagged page, read the full content. Assess:

   • Citation grounding: every factual claim followed by [[sources/<id>]]?
   • Claim currency: references to recent events/studies that may be outdated?
   • Cross-links: does the page link to related concepts and entities?
   • Schema compliance: required frontmatter fields present? (WIKI.md § 3)

3. Prioritize findings: Rank by severity:

   • Critical — citation missing on a specific factual claim
   • High — stale claim with a clear update source
   • Medium — missing cross-link to a closely related page
   • Low — prose quality, heading structure

4. Propose fixes: For each critical/high finding, propose the specific remediation:

   • Missing citation → suggest running /wiki-cite on the page
   • Stale claim → identify the source that would update it
   • Missing cross-link → name the target page

5. Apply with user approval: Do not apply fixes autonomously. Present the ranked list and ask which to address. Then use the appropriate skill or command.

Key constraints

• Read-only by default. Never edit pages without explicit user confirmation per finding.
• wiki lint writes a report to .knowledge/lint/ — not a wiki page.
• Claim accuracy assessment is advisory; the user is the authority on domain knowledge.