receiving-code-review
Consult after receiving review feedback and before implementation when the feedback needs evidence-based evaluation.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Consult after receiving review feedback and before implementation when the feedback needs evidence-based evaluation.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Consult before delegating implementation when an approved plan benefits from worker context isolation and durable coordination.
Consult before attempting a fix when root cause or behavior is unclear, failures repeat, components interact, or guessing would be unsafe.
Consult before implementing an observable behavior change when a meaningful automated test seam exists; use proportional red-green evidence.
Consult directly matching task playbooks before substantial design, debugging, implementation, review, or completion work without forcing full workflow execution.
Consult before making a substantive completion claim; require current trustworthy evidence and semantic acceptance.
Consult when multi-round implementation, context compaction, or worker handoff requires a durable execution contract.
| name | receiving-code-review |
| description | Consult after receiving review feedback and before implementation when the feedback needs evidence-based evaluation. |
Read feedback and verify it against code, requirements, and current behavior. Treat review comments as evidence to evaluate, not orders or a social exchange.
Clarify ambiguity only when it changes intent, coupling, or safety. Independent and clear items may proceed while a separate load-bearing question is resolved; do not turn unrelated fixes into a one-item ritual. For accepted findings, state the observed issue, chosen change, and validation.
Push back when evidence shows a conflict with contracts, compatibility, architecture, or real usage. Keep the response factual; gratitude style is not a workflow requirement.