一键导入
section-policy-judge
Override deterministic section suppression when manifest evidence shows the section should stay active.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Override deterministic section suppression when manifest evidence shows the section should stay active.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Orchestration skill: chains the full ADLC Build Loop. PRD → Brief → Council → Scaffold → Codegen → LDD → TDD → Council → PR. Use when implementing a new feature end-to-end.
Generate a bounded, schema-valid goal prompt from one validated Build Brief task for zero-context external execution.
Applicability-aware Definition of Done checklist. Core checks apply to every task; overlay checks activate only when the applicability manifest says the surface exists. Binary verification — pass or fail. Triggers at Phase 4 completion and Phase 5 entry.
Score whether each task is specific enough for autonomous, one-shot, production-ready execution.
Reviews code changes for understanding, blast radius, state, secrets, assumptions, and explainability. Produces a blocking comprehension artifact when implications are unclear.
Resolve ambiguous triage outcomes in the middle confidence band.
| name | section-policy-judge |
| description | Override deterministic section suppression when manifest evidence shows the section should stay active. |
| contract_version | 1.0.0 |
| side_effect_profile | read_only |
| activation | {"mode":"judgement","consumes_manifest":true,"model_class":"fast_judge","cost_guard":{"max_tokens_per_call":700,"expected_calls_per_run":2}} |
Run this after deterministic section-policy evaluation and only for sections currently suppressed or marked not applicable.
section_policy entries{
"overrides": [
{
"section_name": "5_security_review",
"status": "active",
"reason": "Docs task changes credential-handling guidance and needs explicit security review.",
"evidence": ["claim provenance: auth guidance edit"],
"overridden_by": "section_policy_judge"
}
]
}