菜单
Version 2.35.0 | PRD to Production | Zero Human Intervention > Research-enhanced: OpenAI SDK, DeepMind, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Agent SDK, HN Production (2025)
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Run protected AAS maintainer sweeps, PR merge batches, canonical sync, Core preview checks, and scripted releases. Use for repository maintenance, main alignment, CLI/MCP/Workbench changes, or release work; not ordinary contribution tasks.
Interact with Google NotebookLM to query documentation with Gemini's source-grounded answers. Each question opens a fresh browser session, retrieves the answer exclusively from your uploaded documents, and closes.
Integracao completa com Telegram Bot API. Setup com BotFather, mensagens, webhooks, inline keyboards, grupos, canais. Boilerplates Node.js e Python.
Turn YouTube talks into local study notes with slides, transcripts, editable annotations, and a markdown-backed viewer.
Analyze Neuropixels extracellular recordings end-to-end with SpikeInterface. Covers loading SpikeGLX/Open Ephys/NWB data, preprocessing, drift/motion correction, Kilosort4 (and CPU) spike sorting, quality metrics, and unit curation (threshold-based, model-based UnitRefine, and AI-assisted visual review). Use when working with Neuropixels 1.0/2.0 recordings, spike sorting, or extracellular electrophysiology analysis.
Search and read full-text biomedical papers, FDA/PMDA/EMA regulatory documents, clinical trial registries, and UniProt/PDB/ChEMBL entries with the Paperclip CLI from GXL. Covers installing and authenticating the `paperclip` binary with a PAPERCLIP_API_KEY, the read-only virtual filesystem under /papers, /fda, /trials, /proteins and /clipboard, source-scoped semantic search, corpus-wide grep, metadata lookup and SQL, map/reduce reading across many papers, figure vision analysis, opt-in paper repositories with claim verification, and line-pinned citations. Use when asked to install paperclip, run paperclip search/grep/map/reduce/sql/repo, find or read biomedical literature, regulatory filings or clinical trials through paperclip, or produce citations with line numbers.
| name | loki-mode |
| description | Version 2.35.0 | PRD to Production | Zero Human Intervention > Research-enhanced: OpenAI SDK, DeepMind, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Agent SDK, HN Production (2025) |
| risk | critical |
| source | community |
| date_added | 2026-02-27 |
Version 2.35.0 | PRD to Production | Zero Human Intervention Research-enhanced: OpenAI SDK, DeepMind, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Agent SDK, HN Production (2025)
.loki/CONTINUITY.md - Your working memory + "Mistakes & Learnings".loki/memory/ (episodic patterns, anti-patterns).loki/state/orchestrator.json - Current phase/metrics.loki/queue/pending.json - Next tasks| File | Purpose | Update When |
|---|---|---|
.loki/CONTINUITY.md | Working memory - what am I doing NOW? | Every turn |
.loki/memory/semantic/ | Generalized patterns & anti-patterns | After task completion |
.loki/memory/episodic/ | Specific interaction traces | After each action |
.loki/metrics/efficiency/ | Task efficiency scores & rewards | After each task |
.loki/specs/openapi.yaml | API spec - source of truth | Architecture changes |
CLAUDE.md | Project context - arch & patterns | Significant changes |
.loki/queue/*.json | Task states | Every task change |
START
|
+-- Read CONTINUITY.md ----------+
| |
+-- Task in-progress? |
| +-- YES: Resume |
| +-- NO: Check pending queue |
| |
+-- Pending tasks? |
| +-- YES: Claim highest priority
| +-- NO: Check phase completion
| |
+-- Phase done? |
| +-- YES: Advance to next phase
| +-- NO: Generate tasks for phase
| |
LOOP <-----------------------------+
Bootstrap -> Discovery -> Architecture -> Infrastructure
| | | |
(Setup) (Analyze PRD) (Design) (Cloud/DB Setup)
|
Development <- QA <- Deployment <- Business Ops <- Growth Loop
| | | | |
(Build) (Test) (Release) (Monitor) (Iterate)
Spec-First: OpenAPI -> Tests -> Code -> Validate
Code Review: Blind Review (parallel) -> Debate (if disagree) -> Devil's Advocate -> Merge
Guardrails: Input Guard (BLOCK) -> Execute -> Output Guard (VALIDATE) (OpenAI SDK)
Tripwires: Validation fails -> Halt execution -> Escalate or retry
Fallbacks: Try primary -> Model fallback -> Workflow fallback -> Human escalation
Explore-Plan-Code: Research files -> Create plan (NO CODE) -> Execute plan (Anthropic)
Self-Verification: Code -> Test -> Fail -> Learn -> Update CONTINUITY.md -> Retry
Constitutional Self-Critique: Generate -> Critique against principles -> Revise (Anthropic)
Memory Consolidation: Episodic (trace) -> Pattern Extraction -> Semantic (knowledge)
Hierarchical Reasoning: High-level planner -> Skill selection -> Local executor (DeepMind)
Tool Orchestration: Classify Complexity -> Select Agents -> Track Efficiency -> Reward Learning
Debate Verification: Proponent defends -> Opponent challenges -> Synthesize (DeepMind)
Handoff Callbacks: on_handoff -> Pre-fetch context -> Transfer with data (OpenAI SDK)
Narrow Scope: 3-5 steps max -> Human review -> Continue (HN Production)
Context Curation: Manual selection -> Focused context -> Fresh per task (HN Production)
Deterministic Validation: LLM output -> Rule-based checks -> Retry or approve (HN Production)
Routing Mode: Simple task -> Direct dispatch | Complex task -> Supervisor orchestration (AWS Bedrock)
E2E Browser Testing: Playwright MCP -> Automate browser -> Verify UI features visually (Anthropic Harness)
# Launch with autonomous permissions
claude
This system runs with ZERO human intervention.
autonomy/run.sh while running - Editing a running bash script corrupts execution (bash reads incrementally, not all at once). If you need to fix run.sh, note it in CONTINUITY.md for the next session.These files are part of the running Loki Mode process. Editing them will crash the session:
| File | Reason |
|---|---|
~/.claude/skills/loki-mode/autonomy/run.sh | Currently executing bash script |
.loki/dashboard/* | Legacy dashboard assets; network serving is disabled |
If bugs are found in these files, document them in .loki/CONTINUITY.md under "Pending Fixes" for manual repair after the session ends.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| REASON: What needs to be done next? |
| - READ .loki/CONTINUITY.md first (working memory) |
| - READ "Mistakes & Learnings" to avoid past errors |
| - Check orchestrator.json, review pending.json |
| - Identify highest priority unblocked task |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ACT: Execute the task |
| - Dispatch subagent via Task tool OR execute directly |
| - Write code, run tests, fix issues |
| - Commit changes atomically (git checkpoint) |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| REFLECT: Did it work? What next? |
| - Verify task success (tests pass, no errors) |
| - UPDATE .loki/CONTINUITY.md with progress |
| - Check completion promise - are we done? |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| VERIFY: Let AI test its own work (2-3x quality improvement) |
| - Run automated tests (unit, integration, E2E) |
| - Check compilation/build (no errors or warnings) |
| - Verify against spec (.loki/specs/openapi.yaml) |
| |
| IF VERIFICATION FAILS: |
| 1. Capture error details (stack trace, logs) |
| 2. Analyze root cause |
| 3. UPDATE CONTINUITY.md "Mistakes & Learnings" |
| 4. Rollback to last good git checkpoint (if needed) |
| 5. Apply learning and RETRY from REASON |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
CRITICAL: Use the right model for each task type. Opus is ONLY for planning/architecture.
| Model | Use For | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Opus 4.5 | PLANNING ONLY - Architecture & high-level decisions | System design, architecture decisions, planning, security audits |
| Sonnet 4.5 | DEVELOPMENT - Implementation & functional testing | Feature implementation, API endpoints, bug fixes, integration/E2E tests |
| Haiku 4.5 | OPERATIONS - Simple tasks & monitoring | Unit tests, docs, bash commands, linting, monitoring, file operations |
# Opus for planning/architecture ONLY
Task(subagent_type="Plan", model="opus", description="Design system architecture", prompt="...")
# Sonnet for development and functional testing
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Implement API endpoint", prompt="...")
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Write integration tests", prompt="...")
# Haiku for unit tests, monitoring, and simple tasks (PREFER THIS for speed)
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku", description="Run unit tests", prompt="...")
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku", description="Check service health", prompt="...")
# Launch 10+ Haiku agents in parallel for unit test suite
for test_file in test_files:
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku",
description=f"Run unit tests: {test_file}",
run_in_background=True)
Background Agents:
# Launch background agent - returns immediately with output_file path
Task(description="Long analysis task", run_in_background=True, prompt="...")
# Output truncated to 30K chars - use Read tool to check full output file
Agent Resumption (for interrupted/long-running tasks):
# First call returns agent_id
result = Task(description="Complex refactor", prompt="...")
# agent_id from result can resume later
Task(resume="agent-abc123", prompt="Continue from where you left off")
When to use resume:
Two dispatch modes based on task complexity - reduces latency for simple tasks:
| Mode | When to Use | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Routing | Simple, single-domain tasks | Route directly to specialist agent, skip orchestration |
| Supervisor Mode | Complex, multi-step tasks | Full decomposition, coordination, result synthesis |
Decision Logic:
Task Received
|
+-- Is task single-domain? (one file, one skill, clear scope)
| +-- YES: Direct Route to specialist agent
| | - Faster (no orchestration overhead)
| | - Minimal context (avoid confusion)
| | - Examples: "Fix typo in README", "Run unit tests"
| |
| +-- NO: Supervisor Mode
| - Full task decomposition
| - Coordinate multiple agents
| - Synthesize results
| - Examples: "Implement auth system", "Refactor API layer"
|
+-- Fallback: If intent unclear, use Supervisor Mode
Direct Routing Examples (Skip Orchestration):
# Simple tasks -> Direct dispatch to Haiku
Task(model="haiku", description="Fix import in utils.py", prompt="...") # Direct
Task(model="haiku", description="Run linter on src/", prompt="...") # Direct
Task(model="haiku", description="Generate docstring for function", prompt="...") # Direct
# Complex tasks -> Supervisor orchestration (default Sonnet)
Task(description="Implement user authentication with OAuth", prompt="...") # Supervisor
Task(description="Refactor database layer for performance", prompt="...") # Supervisor
Context Depth by Routing Mode:
"Keep in mind, complex task histories might confuse simpler subagents." - AWS Best Practices
Critical: Features are NOT complete until verified via browser automation.
# Enable Playwright MCP for E2E testing
# In settings or via mcp_servers config:
mcp_servers = {
"playwright": {"command": "npx", "args": ["@playwright/mcp@latest"]}
}
# Agent can then automate browser to verify features work visually
E2E Verification Flow:
"Claude mostly did well at verifying features end-to-end once explicitly prompted to use browser automation tools." - Anthropic Engineering
Note: Playwright cannot detect browser-native alert modals. Use custom UI for confirmations.
Inspired by NVIDIA ToolOrchestra: Track efficiency, learn from rewards, adapt agent selection.
| Metric | What to Track | Store In |
|---|---|---|
| Wall time | Seconds from start to completion | .loki/metrics/efficiency/ |
| Agent count | Number of subagents spawned | .loki/metrics/efficiency/ |
| Retry count | Attempts before success | .loki/metrics/efficiency/ |
| Model usage | Haiku/Sonnet/Opus call distribution | .loki/metrics/efficiency/ |
OUTCOME REWARD: +1.0 (success) | 0.0 (partial) | -1.0 (failure)
EFFICIENCY REWARD: 0.0-1.0 based on resources vs baseline
PREFERENCE REWARD: Inferred from user actions (commit/revert/edit)
| Complexity | Max Agents | Planning | Development | Testing | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trivial | 1 | - | haiku | haiku | skip |
| Simple | 2 | - | haiku | haiku | single |
| Moderate | 4 | sonnet | sonnet | haiku | standard (3 parallel) |
| Complex | 8 | opus | sonnet | haiku | deep (+ devil's advocate) |
| Critical | 12 | opus | sonnet | sonnet | exhaustive + human checkpoint |
See references/tool-orchestration.md for full implementation details.
Single-Responsibility Principle: Each agent should have ONE clear goal and narrow scope. (UiPath Best Practices)
Every subagent dispatch MUST include:
## GOAL (What success looks like)
[High-level objective, not just the action]
Example: "Refactor authentication for maintainability and testability"
NOT: "Refactor the auth file"
## CONSTRAINTS (What you cannot do)
- No third-party dependencies without approval
- Maintain backwards compatibility with v1.x API
- Keep response time under 200ms
## CONTEXT (What you need to know)
- Related files: [list with brief descriptions]
- Previous attempts: [what was tried, why it failed]
## OUTPUT FORMAT (What to deliver)
- [ ] Pull request with Why/What/Trade-offs description
- [ ] Unit tests with >90% coverage
- [ ] Update API documentation
## WHEN COMPLETE
Report back with: WHY, WHAT, TRADE-OFFS, RISKS
Never ship code without passing all quality gates:
Guardrails Execution Modes:
Research insight: Blind review + Devil's Advocate reduces false positives by 30% (CONSENSAGENT, 2025). OpenAI insight: "Layered defense - multiple specialized guardrails create resilient agents."
See references/quality-control.md and references/openai-patterns.md for details.
Loki Mode has 37 specialized agent types across 7 swarms. The orchestrator spawns only agents needed for your project.
| Swarm | Agent Count | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 8 | frontend, backend, database, mobile, api, qa, perf, infra |
| Operations | 8 | devops, sre, security, monitor, incident, release, cost, compliance |
| Business | 8 | marketing, sales, finance, legal, support, hr, investor, partnerships |
| Data | 3 | ml, data-eng, analytics |
| Product | 3 | pm, design, techwriter |
| Growth | 4 | growth-hacker, community, success, lifecycle |
| Review | 3 | code, business, security |
See references/agent-types.md for complete definitions and capabilities.
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Agent stuck/no progress | Lost context | Read .loki/CONTINUITY.md first thing every turn |
| Task repeating | Not checking queue state | Check .loki/queue/*.json before claiming |
| Code review failing | Skipped static analysis | Run static analysis BEFORE AI reviewers |
| Breaking API changes | Code before spec | Follow Spec-First workflow |
| Rate limit hit | Too many parallel agents | Check circuit breakers, use exponential backoff |
| Tests failing after merge | Skipped quality gates | Never bypass Severity-Based Blocking |
| Can't find what to do | Not following decision tree | Use Decision Tree, check orchestrator.json |
| Memory/context growing | Not using ledgers | Write to ledgers after completing tasks |
Based on OpenAI Agent Safety Patterns:
opus -> sonnet -> haiku (if rate limited or unavailable)
Full workflow fails -> Simplified workflow -> Decompose to subtasks -> Human escalation
| Trigger | Action |
|---|---|
| retry_count > 3 | Pause and escalate |
| domain in [payments, auth, pii] | Require approval |
| confidence_score < 0.6 | Pause and escalate |
| wall_time > expected * 3 | Pause and escalate |
| tokens_used > budget * 0.8 | Pause and escalate |
See references/openai-patterns.md for full fallback implementation.
Read target project's AGENTS.md if exists (OpenAI/AAIF standard):
Context Priority:
1. AGENTS.md (closest to current file)
2. CLAUDE.md (Claude-specific)
3. .loki/CONTINUITY.md (session state)
4. Package docs
5. README.md
Self-critique against explicit principles, not just learned preferences.
core_principles:
- "Never delete production data without explicit backup"
- "Never commit secrets or credentials to version control"
- "Never bypass quality gates for speed"
- "Always verify tests pass before marking task complete"
- "Never claim completion without running actual tests"
- "Prefer simple solutions over clever ones"
- "Document decisions, not just code"
- "When unsure, reject action or flag for review"
1. Generate response/code
2. Critique against each principle
3. Revise if any principle violated
4. Only then proceed with action
See references/lab-research-patterns.md for Constitutional AI implementation.
For critical changes, use structured debate between AI critics.
Proponent (defender) --> Presents proposal with evidence
|
v
Opponent (challenger) --> Finds flaws, challenges claims
|
v
Synthesizer --> Weighs arguments, produces verdict
|
v
If disagreement persists --> Escalate to human
Use for: Architecture decisions, security-sensitive changes, major refactors.
See references/lab-research-patterns.md for debate verification details.
Battle-tested insights from practitioners building real systems.
task_constraints:
max_steps_before_review: 3-5
characteristics:
- Specific, well-defined objectives
- Pre-classified inputs
- Deterministic success criteria
- Verifiable outputs
confidence >= 0.95 --> Auto-approve with audit log
confidence >= 0.70 --> Quick human review
confidence >= 0.40 --> Detailed human review
confidence < 0.40 --> Escalate immediately
Wrap agent outputs with rule-based validation (NOT LLM-judged):
1. Agent generates output
2. Run linter (deterministic)
3. Run tests (deterministic)
4. Check compilation (deterministic)
5. Only then: human or AI review
principles:
- "Less is more" - focused beats comprehensive
- Manual selection outperforms automatic RAG
- Fresh conversations per major task
- Remove outdated information aggressively
context_budget:
target: "< 10k tokens for context"
reserve: "90% for model reasoning"
Use sub-agents to prevent token waste on noisy subtasks:
Main agent (focused) --> Sub-agent (file search)
--> Sub-agent (test running)
--> Sub-agent (linting)
See references/production-patterns.md for full practitioner patterns.
| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
| Product launched, stable 24h | Enter growth loop mode |
| Unrecoverable failure | Save state, halt, request human |
| PRD updated | Diff, create delta tasks, continue |
| Revenue target hit | Log success, continue optimization |
| Runway < 30 days | Alert, optimize costs aggressively |
.loki/
+-- CONTINUITY.md # Working memory (read/update every turn)
+-- specs/
| +-- openapi.yaml # API spec - source of truth
+-- queue/
| +-- pending.json # Tasks waiting to be claimed
| +-- in-progress.json # Currently executing tasks
| +-- completed.json # Finished tasks
| +-- dead-letter.json # Failed tasks for review
+-- state/
| +-- orchestrator.json # Master state (phase, metrics)
| +-- agents/ # Per-agent state files
| +-- circuit-breakers/ # Rate limiting state
+-- memory/
| +-- episodic/ # Specific interaction traces (what happened)
| +-- semantic/ # Generalized patterns (how things work)
| +-- skills/ # Learned action sequences (how to do X)
| +-- ledgers/ # Agent-specific checkpoints
| +-- handoffs/ # Agent-to-agent transfers
+-- metrics/
| +-- efficiency/ # Task efficiency scores (time, agents, retries)
| +-- rewards/ # Outcome/efficiency/preference rewards
| +-- dashboard.json # Rolling metrics summary
+-- artifacts/
+-- reports/ # Generated reports/dashboards
See references/architecture.md for full structure and state schemas.
Loki Mode # Start fresh
Loki Mode with PRD at path/to/prd # Start with PRD
Skill Metadata:
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Trigger | "Loki Mode" or "Loki Mode with PRD at [path]" |
| Skip When | Need human approval, want to review plan first, single small task |
| Related Skills | subagent-driven-development, executing-plans |
Detailed documentation is split into reference files for progressive loading:
| Reference | Content |
|---|---|
references/core-workflow.md | Full RARV cycle, CONTINUITY.md template, autonomy rules |
references/quality-control.md | Quality gates, anti-sycophancy, blind review, severity blocking |
references/openai-patterns.md | OpenAI Agents SDK: guardrails, tripwires, handoffs, fallbacks |
references/lab-research-patterns.md | DeepMind + Anthropic: Constitutional AI, debate, world models |
references/production-patterns.md | HN 2025: What actually works in production, context engineering |
references/advanced-patterns.md | 2025 research: MAR, Iter-VF, GoalAct, CONSENSAGENT |
references/tool-orchestration.md | ToolOrchestra patterns: efficiency, rewards, dynamic selection |
references/memory-system.md | Episodic/semantic memory, consolidation, Zettelkasten linking |
references/agent-types.md | All 37 agent types with full capabilities |
references/task-queue.md | Queue system, dead letter handling, circuit breakers |
references/sdlc-phases.md | All phases with detailed workflows and testing |
references/spec-driven-dev.md | OpenAPI-first workflow, validation, contract testing |
references/architecture.md | Directory structure, state schemas, bootstrap |
references/mcp-integration.md | MCP server capabilities and integration |
references/claude-best-practices.md | Boris Cherny patterns, thinking mode, ledgers |
references/deployment.md | Cloud deployment instructions per provider |
references/business-ops.md | Business operation workflows |
Version: 2.32.0 | Lines: ~600 | Research-Enhanced: Labs + HN Production Patterns
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.