一键导入
unit-testing-test-generate
Generate comprehensive, maintainable unit tests across languages with strong coverage and edge case focus.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Generate comprehensive, maintainable unit tests across languages with strong coverage and edge case focus.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
Helps an AI assistant work with the Miraheze wiki farm — writing wiki requests that get approved, navigating ManageWiki, doing common how-to tasks (templates, skins, permissions, custom domains, backups), writing regex for MediaWiki search-and-replace, AND writing actual article and page content for Miraheze-hosted wikis. Miraheze does NOT ban generative AI; AI-written content is permitted (subject to per-wiki rules). MADE BY SQERSTERS
Helps an AI assistant write, structure, and edit articles in the encyclopedic style of Wikipedia — neutral tone, lead section, summary style, inline citations, no peacock/weasel/persuasive language, and the stub→FA quality ladder. Also covers Simple English Wikipedia rules. MADE BY SQERSTERS
| name | unit-testing-test-generate |
| description | Generate comprehensive, maintainable unit tests across languages with strong coverage and edge case focus. |
| risk | unknown |
| source | community |
| date_added | 2026-02-27 |
You are a test automation expert specializing in generating comprehensive, maintainable unit tests across multiple languages and frameworks. Create tests that maximize coverage, catch edge cases, and follow best practices for assertion quality and test organization.
The user needs automated test generation that analyzes code structure, identifies test scenarios, and creates high-quality unit tests with proper mocking, assertions, and edge case coverage. Focus on framework-specific patterns and maintainable test suites.
$ARGUMENTS
Scan codebase to identify untested code and generate comprehensive test suites:
import ast
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Dict, List, Any
class TestGenerator:
def __init__(self, language: str):
self.language = language
self.framework_map = {
'python': 'pytest',
'javascript': 'jest',
'typescript': 'jest',
'java': 'junit',
'go': 'testing'
}
def analyze_file(self, file_path: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Extract testable units from source file"""
if self.language == 'python':
return self._analyze_python(file_path)
elif self.language in ['javascript', 'typescript']:
return self._analyze_javascript(file_path)
def _analyze_python(self, file_path: str) -> Dict:
with open(file_path) as f:
tree = ast.parse(f.read())
functions = []
classes = []
for node in ast.walk(tree):
if isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef):
functions.append({
'name': node.name,
'args': [arg.arg for arg in node.args.args],
'returns': ast.unparse(node.returns) if node.returns else None,
'decorators': [ast.unparse(d) for d in node.decorator_list],
'docstring': ast.get_docstring(node),
'complexity': self._calculate_complexity(node)
})
elif isinstance(node, ast.ClassDef):
methods = [n.name for n in node.body if isinstance(n, ast.FunctionDef)]
classes.append({
'name': node.name,
'methods': methods,
'bases': [ast.unparse(base) for base in node.bases]
})
return {'functions': functions, 'classes': classes, 'file': file_path}
def generate_pytest_tests(self, analysis: Dict) -> str:
"""Generate pytest test file from code analysis"""
tests = ['import pytest', 'from unittest.mock import Mock, patch', '']
module_name = Path(analysis['file']).stem
tests.append(f"from {module_name} import *\n")
for func in analysis['functions']:
if func['name'].startswith('_'):
continue
test_class = self._generate_function_tests(func)
tests.append(test_class)
for cls in analysis['classes']:
test_class = self._generate_class_tests(cls)
tests.append(test_class)
return '\n'.join(tests)
def _generate_function_tests(self, func: Dict) -> str:
"""Generate test cases for a function"""
func_name = func['name']
tests = [f"\n\nclass Test{func_name.title()}:"]
# Happy path test
tests.append(f" def test_{func_name}_success(self):")
tests.append(f" result = {func_name}({self._generate_mock_args(func['args'])})")
tests.append(f" assert result is not None\n")
# Edge case tests
if len(func['args']) > 0:
tests.append(f" def test_{func_name}_with_empty_input(self):")
tests.append(f" with pytest.raises((ValueError, TypeError)):")
tests.append(f" {func_name}({self._generate_empty_args(func['args'])})\n")
# Exception handling test
tests.append(f" def test_{func_name}_handles_errors(self):")
tests.append(f" with pytest.raises(Exception):")
tests.append(f" {func_name}({self._generate_invalid_args(func['args'])})\n")
return '\n'.join(tests)
def _generate_class_tests(self, cls: Dict) -> str:
"""Generate test cases for a class"""
tests = [f"\n\nclass Test{cls['name']}:"]
tests.append(f" @pytest.fixture")
tests.append(f" def instance(self):")
tests.append(f" return {cls['name']}()\n")
for method in cls['methods']:
if method.startswith('_') and method != '__init__':
continue
tests.append(f" def test_{method}(self, instance):")
tests.append(f" result = instance.{method}()")
tests.append(f" assert result is not None\n")
return '\n'.join(tests)
interface TestCase {
name: string;
setup?: string;
execution: string;
assertions: string[];
}
class JestTestGenerator {
generateTests(functionName: string, params: string[]): string {
const tests: TestCase[] = [
{
name: `${functionName} returns expected result with valid input`,
execution: `const result = ${functionName}(${this.generateMockParams(params)})`,
assertions: ['expect(result).toBeDefined()', 'expect(result).not.toBeNull()']
},
{
name: `${functionName} handles null input gracefully`,
execution: `const result = ${functionName}(null)`,
assertions: ['expect(result).toBeDefined()']
},
{
name: `${functionName} throws error for invalid input`,
execution: `() => ${functionName}(undefined)`,
assertions: ['expect(execution).toThrow()']
}
];
return this.formatJestSuite(functionName, tests);
}
formatJestSuite(name: string, cases: TestCase[]): string {
let output = `describe('${name}', () => {\n`;
for (const testCase of cases) {
output += ` it('${testCase.name}', () => {\n`;
if (testCase.setup) {
output += ` ${testCase.setup}\n`;
}
output += ` const execution = ${testCase.execution};\n`;
for (const assertion of testCase.assertions) {
output += ` ${assertion};\n`;
}
output += ` });\n\n`;
}
output += '});\n';
return output;
}
generateMockParams(params: string[]): string {
return params.map(p => `mock${p.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + p.slice(1)}`).join(', ');
}
}
function generateReactComponentTest(componentName: string): string {
return `
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
import { ${componentName} } from './${componentName}';
describe('${componentName}', () => {
it('renders without crashing', () => {
render(<${componentName} />);
expect(screen.getByRole('main')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it('displays correct initial state', () => {
render(<${componentName} />);
const element = screen.getByTestId('${componentName.toLowerCase()}');
expect(element).toBeVisible();
});
it('handles user interaction', () => {
render(<${componentName} />);
const button = screen.getByRole('button');
fireEvent.click(button);
expect(screen.getByText(/clicked/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it('updates props correctly', () => {
const { rerender } = render(<${componentName} value="initial" />);
expect(screen.getByText('initial')).toBeInTheDocument();
rerender(<${componentName} value="updated" />);
expect(screen.getByText('updated')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
});
`;
}
import subprocess
import json
class CoverageAnalyzer:
def analyze_coverage(self, test_command: str) -> Dict:
"""Run tests with coverage and identify gaps"""
result = subprocess.run(
[test_command, '--coverage', '--json'],
capture_output=True,
text=True
)
coverage_data = json.loads(result.stdout)
gaps = self.identify_coverage_gaps(coverage_data)
return {
'overall_coverage': coverage_data.get('totals', {}).get('percent_covered', 0),
'uncovered_lines': gaps,
'files_below_threshold': self.find_low_coverage_files(coverage_data, 80)
}
def identify_coverage_gaps(self, coverage: Dict) -> List[Dict]:
"""Find specific lines/functions without test coverage"""
gaps = []
for file_path, data in coverage.get('files', {}).items():
missing_lines = data.get('missing_lines', [])
if missing_lines:
gaps.append({
'file': file_path,
'lines': missing_lines,
'functions': data.get('excluded_lines', [])
})
return gaps
def generate_tests_for_gaps(self, gaps: List[Dict]) -> str:
"""Generate tests specifically for uncovered code"""
tests = []
for gap in gaps:
test_code = self.create_targeted_test(gap)
tests.append(test_code)
return '\n\n'.join(tests)
def generate_mock_objects(self, dependencies: List[str]) -> str:
"""Generate mock objects for external dependencies"""
mocks = ['from unittest.mock import Mock, MagicMock, patch\n']
for dep in dependencies:
mocks.append(f"@pytest.fixture")
mocks.append(f"def mock_{dep}():")
mocks.append(f" mock = Mock(spec={dep})")
mocks.append(f" mock.method.return_value = 'mocked_result'")
mocks.append(f" return mock\n")
return '\n'.join(mocks)
Focus on generating maintainable, comprehensive tests that catch bugs early and provide confidence in code changes.