一键导入
lno-prioritize
Find out if you're spending time on the wrong things. Categorize backlog by Leverage/Neutral/Overhead and challenge your time allocation.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Find out if you're spending time on the wrong things. Categorize backlog by Leverage/Neutral/Overhead and challenge your time allocation.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | lno-prioritize |
| description | Find out if you're spending time on the wrong things. Categorize backlog by Leverage/Neutral/Overhead and challenge your time allocation. |
Most PMs waste time on overhead disguised as strategy.
This skill categorizes your backlog by actual impact:
Then tells you if your time allocation is broken.
Works with:
When this skill is invoked, start with:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
LNO PRIORITIZATION
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Are you spending 60%+ time on Leverage work?
Most PMs aren't.
What do you want to analyze?
1. Current sprint/cycle
→ I'll fetch and categorize all active issues
2. Specific team or project
→ Focus on a subset of your backlog
3. Paste issue list
→ I'll categorize what you provide
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Categorizes every issue, then challenges your priorities:
/lno-prioritize
Optional parameters:
/lno-prioritize --team [team-name] - Categorize specific team's issues/lno-prioritize --project [project-name] - Categorize specific project/lno-prioritize --label - Auto-add Linear labels (leverage/neutral/overhead)/lno-prioritize --current-sprint - Only analyze current sprint issues--label flag used and using Linear)📊 LNO Prioritization Results
🚀 LEVERAGE (10x impact - be a perfectionist):
- [ENG-245] Rebuild recommendation engine
Reason: Core product differentiator, compounds over time
- [ENG-198] Product strategy for Q2
Reason: Foundational decision affecting all downstream work
📈 NEUTRAL (Regular impact - do good enough work):
- [ENG-301] Update onboarding flow copy
Reason: Important but not transformational
- [ENG-276] Add analytics to checkout page
Reason: Useful data but incremental improvement
⚙️ OVERHEAD (Minimal impact - do quickly):
- [ENG-312] Reformat PRD template
Reason: Administrative work, no strategic value
- [ENG-288] Update Linear labels
Reason: Organizational cleanup
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 YOUR TIME ALLOCATION IS BROKEN
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Current backlog:
- 2 Leverage tasks (20%)
- 4 Neutral tasks (40%)
- 4 Overhead tasks (40%)
TARGET allocation:
- 60% Leverage (you're at 20% - way too low)
- 30% Neutral
- 10% Overhead (you're at 40% - way too high)
WHAT TO DO:
1. **Kill or delegate 3 of 4 Overhead tasks**
- Reformatting templates? Not your job.
- Linear labels? Automate it.
2. **Stop perfectionism on Neutral work**
- Onboarding copy doesn't need to be perfect
- Ship at B- quality and move on
3. **Focus on Leverage:**
- Recommendation engine = your #1 priority
- Q2 strategy = your #2 priority
- Everything else can wait
Want me to create Linear issues to delegate/automate the Overhead work?
With Linear MCP: Automatically fetches Linear issues and can add L/N/O labels.
With GitHub MCP: Automatically fetches GitHub issues and can add labels.
Manual mode: Paste your issues and the skill will categorize them:
Apply the LNO framework to these issues: [paste issue list]
See the full LNO Prioritization framework at:
frameworks/planning/lno-prioritization.md
Framework: Aakash Gupta (based on Shreyas Doshi) Best for: Sprint planning, backlog grooming, time management AI-era adaptation: Focus on leverage work (vision, strategy) while AI handles neutral/overhead tasks
Plan the v1→v2→v3 agency progression for AI features. Walk through mapping how autonomy increases over time, define promotion criteria, and generate artifacts for stakeholder alignment. Based on CC/CD framework.
Expert system for designing and architecting AI agent workflows based on proven Meta methodologies. Use when users need to build AI agents, create agent workflows, solve problems using agentic systems, integrate multiple tools into agent architectures, or need guidance on agent design patterns. Helps translate business problems into structured agent solutions with clear scope, tool integration, and multi-layer architecture planning.
Calculate AI feature costs and challenge if you actually need it. Invokes ai-cost-analyzer agent for detailed economics modeling.
Diagnose why an AI feature is underperforming, hallucinating, or behaving inconsistently. Uses 4D audit to work backwards from symptoms to root cause.
Pre-launch health check that blocks you from shipping broken AI features. Grades 6 dimensions (model selection, data quality, cost, monitoring, failure UX, optimization).
Post-launch AI feature calibration workflow. Document error patterns, review eval performance, and decide on agency promotion. Based on CC/CD framework for continuous calibration of AI products.