菜单
Rewrite an issue's Implementation Steps, Acceptance Criteria, and Files to Modify in place from its own accumulated research findings, without appending or bulldozing human prose
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | ll-reconcile-issue |
| description | Rewrite an issue's Implementation Steps, Acceptance Criteria, and Files to Modify in place from its own accumulated research findings, without appending or bulldozing human prose |
| args | ISSUE_ID |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Glob","Grep","Edit","Bash(ll-issues:*)","Bash(git:*)"] |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| metadata | {"short-description":"Reconcile an issue's directive sections against its own research findings"} |
Bridged from commands/reconcile-issue.md for Codex Skills API discovery.
See the source command file for the full prompt body.
open, in_progress, blocked, deferred, done, cancelled — see .claude/CLAUDE.md § Issue File Format for full enum and forbidden synonyms.Use when asked to audit documentation accuracy, coverage, or find documentation gaps.
Use when asked about project health, velocity, bug trends, or whether we're making progress.
Use when asked for an adversarial go/no-go review or whether an issue is worth implementing.
Use when asked to manually compact a session's memory, trigger session summarization, or reduce a long session's context footprint.
Use when asked to manually compact a session's memory, trigger session summarization, or reduce a long session's context footprint.
Use when asked to detect conflicting requirements or incompatible decisions across open issues.