用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill beamer-presentation命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact.
Use when a research task needs reproducible Kaggle discovery, metadata inspection, bounded public-data downloads, competition or kernel discovery, model discovery, or an explicitly approved Kaggle write/delete operation through the official CLI.
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | beamer-presentation |
| description | Create academic presentations in Beamer with professional themes |
| workflow_stage | communication |
| compatibility | ["claude-code","cursor","codex","gemini-cli"] |
| author | Awesome Econ AI Community |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| tags | ["LaTeX","Beamer","presentations","slides"] |
This skill helps economists create professional academic presentations using LaTeX Beamer. It provides templates for conference talks, job market presentations, and seminar presentations with proper structure and clean aesthetics.
Ask the user:
| Duration | Structure |
|---|---|
| 15-20 min | Motivation (2) → Question (1) → Method (2) → Results (3-4) → Conclusion (1) |
| 45-60 min | Add literature review, more results detail, robustness |
| 90 min | Full seminar with theoretical framework, extensive empirics |
\pause or <+-> for complex slides\documentclass[aspectratio=169, 11pt]{beamer}
% ============================================
% THEME AND APPEARANCE
% ============================================
% Clean minimal theme
\usetheme{metropolis}
\usecolortheme{default}
% Or for a more traditional look:
% \usetheme{Madrid}
% \usecolortheme{whale}
% Custom colors
\definecolor{darkblue}{RGB}{0, 51, 102}
\definecolor{lightgray}{RGB}{245, 245, 245}
\setbeamercolor{frametitle}{bg=darkblue, fg=white}
\setbeamercolor{title}{fg=darkblue}
\setbeamercolor{structure}{fg=darkblue}
% Remove navigation symbols
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
% Frame numbers
\setbeamertemplate{footline}[frame number]
% ============================================
% PACKAGES
% ============================================
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\pgfplotsset{compat=1.17}
% ============================================
% TITLE PAGE
% ============================================
\title{The Effect of X on Y: \\Evidence from Z}
\subtitle{Short and Descriptive}
\author{Your Name}
\institute{Your University}
\date{Conference Name \\ Month Year}
\begin{document}
% Title slide
\begin{frame}[plain]
\titlepage
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% MOTIVATION (2-3 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Motivation: Why This Matters}
\begin{itemize}
\item<1-> \textbf{Big picture:} [One sentence on broad relevance]
\item<2-> \textbf{Specific puzzle:} [What we don't know]
\item<3-> \textbf{Stakes:} [Why should we care?]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\only<4>{
\begin{block}{Key Statistic}
\Large \textbf{X\%} of [outcome] can be explained by [factor]
\end{block}
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{What We Know (and Don't Know)}
\textbf{Previous literature:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Author et al. (2020): Finding 1
\item Other Author (2019): Finding 2
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Gap we fill:}
\begin{itemize}
\item[\textcolor{red}{?}] [Open question our paper addresses]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% RESEARCH QUESTION (1 slide)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{This Paper}
\begin{center}
\Large
\textbf{Research Question:} \\[1em]
Does [X] cause [Y]? \\[2em]
\end{center}
\textbf{Preview of findings:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Main result in plain language
\item Key magnitude: [Quantitative summary]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% EMPIRICAL STRATEGY (2-3 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Data}
\textbf{Sources:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Dataset 1: [Description, years, N]
\item Dataset 2: [Description, matching method]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Sample:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Unit of observation: [What is an observation?]
\item Final sample: [N] observations, [Time period]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Identification Strategy}
\textbf{Challenge:} [Endogeneity concern in one sentence]
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Solution:} We exploit [natural experiment / instrument / RDD]
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Key assumption:} [Identification assumption in plain language]
\begin{equation*}
Y_{it} = \alpha + \beta \cdot \text{Treatment}_{it} + \gamma X_{it} + \mu_i + \delta_t + \varepsilon_{it}
\end{equation*}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% RESULTS (3-5 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Main Result}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{figures/main_result.pdf}
\end{center}
\vspace{0.5em}
\textbf{Takeaway:} [One sentence interpretation]
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Main Result: Regression Table}
\begin{table}
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\toprule
& (1) & (2) & (3) \\
& OLS & + Controls & + FE \\
\midrule
Treatment & 0.052*** & 0.048*** & 0.041** \\
& (0.012) & (0.011) & (0.015) \\
\midrule
Controls & No & Yes & Yes \\
Fixed Effects & No & No & Yes \\
N & 10,000 & 9,850 & 9,850 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\textbf{Economic magnitude:} 1 SD increase in X $\rightarrow$ Y\% increase in outcome
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Robustness Checks}
\begin{itemize}
\item[\checkmark] Alternative specifications
\item[\checkmark] Placebo tests
\item[\checkmark] Different sample cuts
\item[\checkmark] [Other relevant checks]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
$\rightarrow$ Results robust across specifications
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% CONCLUSION (1 slide)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Takeaways}
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Finding 1:} [Main result]
\item \textbf{Finding 2:} [Secondary result]
\item \textbf{Implication:} [Policy/theory takeaway]
\end{enumerate}
\vspace{2em}
\begin{center}
\Large Thank you! \\[0.5em]
\normalsize your.email@university.edu
\end{center}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% APPENDIX
% ============================================
\appendix
\begin{frame}[noframenumbering]{Appendix: Additional Results}
[Backup slides for Q\&A]
\end{frame}
\end{document}
| Audience | Theme | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Academic | metropolis | Clean, modern, minimal |
| Conference | Madrid | Traditional, professional |
| Job market | default with custom colors | Safe, customizable |
| Policy | CambridgeUS | Authoritative look |
\pause