brycewang-stanford
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill lit-review-assistant命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact.
Use when a research task needs reproducible Kaggle discovery, metadata inspection, bounded public-data downloads, competition or kernel discovery, model discovery, or an explicitly approved Kaggle write/delete operation through the official CLI.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | lit-review-assistant |
| description | Search, summarize, and synthesize economics literature |
| workflow_stage | literature |
| compatibility | ["claude-code","cursor","codex","gemini-cli"] |
| author | Awesome Econ AI Community |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| tags | ["literature-review","papers","citations","synthesis"] |
This skill helps economists conduct literature reviews by structuring searches, summarizing papers, and synthesizing findings. It provides templates for organizing literature and identifying research gaps.
Ask the user:
Help define search terms:
Create a structured summary for each paper:
# Literature Review: [TOPIC]
## Search Strategy
**Databases:** EconLit, NBER, Google Scholar, SSRN
**Date range:** 2010-2024
**Search terms:**
- ("minimum wage" OR "wage floor") AND (employment OR jobs)
- ("minimum wage") AND ("difference-in-differences" OR "DiD")
**Inclusion criteria:**
- Peer-reviewed or NBER working papers
- Focused on [specific outcome]
- Uses causal identification strategy
---
## Seminal Papers
### Card and Krueger (1994)
**Citation:** Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1994). Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. *American Economic Review*, 84(4), 772-793.
**Research Question:** What is the effect of minimum wage increases on employment?
**Data & Method:**
- DiD comparing NJ (treatment) to PA (control)
- Survey of fast-food restaurants before/after NJ minimum wage increase
**Key Findings:**
- No negative employment effect found
- Employment slightly increased in NJ relative to PA
**Contribution:** Challenged conventional view; pioneered quasi-experimental methods in labor economics
**Limitations:**
- Single state, short time horizon
- Potential survey response bias
---
### Cengiz et al. (2019)
**Citation:** Cengiz, D., Dube, A., Lindner, A., & Zipperer, B. (2019). The Effect of Minimum Wages on Low-Wage Jobs. *Quarterly Journal of Economics*, 134(3), 1405-1454.
**Research Question:** Do minimum wage increases destroy jobs or compress the wage distribution?
**Data & Method:**
- Bunching estimator using 138 minimum wage events
- Examine employment distribution around minimum wage
Jobs below the new minimum wage disappear
But replaced by jobs just above the minimum
No significant overall employment loss
Novel bunching methodology; large-scale evidence
---
| Finding | Evidence Quality | Consensus Level |
|---------|-----------------|-----------------|
| Small minimum wage increases have minimal employment effects | Strong (multiple RCTs/quasi-experiments) | High |
| Effects may be heterogeneous by region | Medium | Growing |
| Large increases (e.g., $15) less studied | Limited | Low |
How do firms absorb higher labor costs? (Prices, profits, productivity?)
Most studies focus on 1-2 years
Do effects differ in low vs. high cost-of-living areas?
Effects on workers earning above minimum wage
Your study of [SPECIFIC QUESTION] can contribute by:
[How your work fills a gap]
[What new data/method you bring]
## [Author(s)] ([Year])
**Title:** [Full title]
**Published in:** [Journal/Working Paper Series]
**Research Question:** [One sentence]
**Data:**
- Source: [Dataset name]
- Period: [Years]
- Sample: [N observations, unit of analysis]
**Identification Strategy:** [Method in one sentence]
**Main Findings:**
1. [Key result 1 with magnitude]
2. [Key result 2]
3. [Robustness/heterogeneity]
**Limitations:**
- [Main concern 1]
- [Main concern 2]
**Relevance to your project:** [One sentence on how it connects]
**Key quote:** "[Most important direct quote]" (p. XX)
"exact phrase" - Exact matchingauthor:surname - Papers by specific authorsource:journal - Papers in specific journal-exclude - Exclude terms[year]..[year] - Date range