用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill responsible-ai-guide命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact.
Use when a research task needs reproducible Kaggle discovery, metadata inspection, bounded public-data downloads, competition or kernel discovery, model discovery, or an explicitly approved Kaggle write/delete operation through the official CLI.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | responsible-ai-guide |
| description | Resources for trustworthy, fair, and ethical AI research |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"emoji":"⚖️","category":"domains","subcategory":"ai-ml","keywords":["responsible AI","AI ethics","fairness","trustworthy AI","AI safety","bias"],"source":"https://github.com/AthenaCore/AwesomeResponsibleAI"}} |
A comprehensive collection of resources for building trustworthy, fair, and ethical AI systems. Covers fairness metrics, bias detection and mitigation, explainability methods, privacy-preserving techniques, robustness testing, and governance frameworks. Essential reading for researchers working on AI safety, alignment, and deploying models in high-stakes domains.
Responsible AI
├── Fairness
│ ├── Bias detection (data, model, outcome)
│ ├── Fairness metrics (demographic parity, equalized odds)
│ ├── Bias mitigation (pre/in/post-processing)
│ └── Intersectional fairness
├── Explainability
│ ├── Feature attribution (SHAP, LIME, IG)
│ ├── Concept-based (TCAV, concept bottleneck)
│ ├── Counterfactual explanations
│ └── Mechanistic interpretability
├── Privacy
│ ├── Differential privacy
│ ├── Federated learning
│ ├── Membership inference attacks
│ └── Machine unlearning
├── Robustness
│ ├── Adversarial attacks/defenses
│ ├── Distribution shift
│ ├── Uncertainty quantification
│ └── Out-of-distribution detection
├── Safety & Alignment
│ ├── RLHF and preference learning
│ ├── Constitutional AI
│ ├── Red teaming
│ └── Guardrails and filters
└── Governance
├── Model cards
├── Datasheets for datasets
├── AI impact assessments
└── Regulatory compliance (EU AI Act)
| Tool | Category | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Fairlearn | Fairness | Bias assessment + mitigation |
| AI Fairness 360 | Fairness | IBM fairness toolkit |
| SHAP | Explainability | Shapley value explanations |
| Captum | Explainability | PyTorch interpretability |
| Opacus | Privacy | Differential privacy for PyTorch |
| ART | Robustness | Adversarial robustness toolbox |
| Alibi | Explainability | ML model explanations |
from fairlearn.metrics import MetricFrame
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, recall_score
# Assess fairness across demographic groups
metrics = MetricFrame(
metrics={
"accuracy": accuracy_score,
"recall": recall_score,
},
y_true=y_test,
y_pred=y_pred,
sensitive_features=demographics,
)
print("Overall:")
print(metrics.overall)
print("\nBy group:")
print(metrics.by_group)
print("\nDifference (max - min):")
print(metrics.difference())
### Foundations
1. "Fairness and Machine Learning" (Barocas, Hardt, Narayanan)
2. "Datasheets for Datasets" (Gebru et al., 2021)
3. "Model Cards for Model Reporting" (Mitchell et al., 2019)
### Fairness
4. "On Fairness and Calibration" (Pleiss et al., 2017)
5. "Fairness Through Awareness" (Dwork et al., 2012)
### Explainability
6. "A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions" (SHAP)
7. "Why Should I Trust You?" (LIME, Ribeiro et al., 2016)
### Safety
8. "Constitutional AI" (Bai et al., 2022)
9. "Red Teaming Language Models" (Perez et al., 2022)
10. "Scaling Monosemanticity" (Anthropic, 2024)