来源信息
- 仓库
- brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
- 最近来源活动
- 2026年4月3日 02:07
- 检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
- 英语
- 星标
- 3,291
- 分支
- 432
安装方式
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。
检查来源文件
决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
菜单
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill particle-physics-guide命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact.
Use when a research task needs reproducible Kaggle discovery, metadata inspection, bounded public-data downloads, competition or kernel discovery, model discovery, or an explicitly approved Kaggle write/delete operation through the official CLI.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | particle-physics-guide |
| description | Particle physics data analysis with ROOT, HEPData, and event processing |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"emoji":"🌀","category":"domains","subcategory":"physics","keywords":["particle-physics","root","hepdata","collider","event-analysis","high-energy-physics"],"source":"wentor"}} |
A skill for analyzing particle physics data, covering event reconstruction, histogram analysis, statistical methods for discovery, and the standard tools used in high-energy physics (HEP) research. Includes ROOT, uproot, pyhf, and HEPData workflows.
| Format | Description | Typical Size | Access Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROOT (.root) | Columnar binary format, HEP standard | GB-TB | ROOT, uproot |
| NanoAOD | Compact analysis format (CMS) | ~1 KB/event | uproot, coffea |
| DAOD_PHYS | Derived analysis format (ATLAS) | ~10 KB/event | ROOT, uproot |
| HepMC | Monte Carlo event record | Variable | pyhepmc |
| HEPData | Published results (YAML/JSON) | KB | hepdata_lib |
import uproot
import awkward as ak
import numpy as np
def load_nanoaod(filepath: str, tree_name: str = "Events",
branches: list[str] = None) -> ak.Array:
"""
Load a NanoAOD ROOT file into an awkward array.
branches: list of branch names to load (None = all)
"""
with uproot.open(filepath) as f:
tree = f[tree_name]
if branches is None:
branches = tree.keys()
events = tree.arrays(branches, library="ak")
print(f"Loaded {len(events)} events")
print(f"Branches: {events.fields}")
return events
# Example: Load muon data
events = load_nanoaod("nano_data.root", branches=[
"nMuon", "Muon_pt", "Muon_eta", "Muon_phi", "Muon_mass",
"Muon_charge", "Muon_pfRelIso04_all", "Muon_tightId",
])
def compute_invariant_mass(pt1, eta1, phi1, mass1,
pt2, eta2, phi2, mass2):
"""
Compute invariant mass of a particle pair from 4-momentum components.
Uses the relativistic energy-momentum relation.
"""
# Convert to Cartesian 4-vectors
px1 = pt1 * np.cos(phi1)
py1 = pt1 * np.sin(phi1)
pz1 = pt1 * np.sinh(eta1)
e1 = np.sqrt(px1**2 + py1**2 + pz1**2 + mass1**2)
px2 = pt2 * np.cos(phi2)
py2 = pt2 * np.sin(phi2)
pz2 = pt2 * np.sinh(eta2)
e2 = np.sqrt(px2**2 + py2**2 + pz2**2 + mass2**2)
# Invariant mass of the pair
m_inv = np.sqrt(
(e1 + e2)**2 - (px1 + px2)**2 - (py1 + py2)**2 - (pz1 + pz2)**2
)
return m_inv
def select_z_candidates(events):
"""
Select Z -> mu+mu- candidates from NanoAOD events.
Requires exactly 2 opposite-sign muons passing quality cuts.
"""
# Quality cuts
muon_mask = (
(events.Muon_pt > 20) & # pT > 20 GeV
(abs(events.Muon_eta) < 2.4) & # |eta| < 2.4
(events.Muon_tightId == True) & # tight muon ID
(events.Muon_pfRelIso04_all < 0.15) # relative isolation
)
# Apply mask and require exactly 2 muons
good_muons = events[muon_mask]
dimuon_events = good_muons[ak.num(good_muons.Muon_pt) == 2]
# Opposite sign requirement
opposite_sign = (
dimuon_events.Muon_charge[:, 0] * dimuon_events.Muon_charge[:, ] <
)
z_candidates = dimuon_events[opposite_sign]
m_inv = compute_invariant_mass(
z_candidates.Muon_pt[:, ], z_candidates.Muon_eta[:, ],
z_candidates.Muon_phi[:, ], z_candidates.Muon_mass[:, ],
z_candidates.Muon_pt[:, ], z_candidates.Muon_eta[:, ],
z_candidates.Muon_phi[:, ], z_candidates.Muon_mass[:, ],
)
m_inv
import pyhf
def build_counting_model(signal: float, background: float,
bkg_uncertainty: float) -> dict:
"""
Build a simple counting experiment model in pyhf.
signal: expected signal yield
background: expected background yield
bkg_uncertainty: relative uncertainty on background
"""
model = pyhf.simplemodels.uncorrelated_background(
signal=[signal],
bkg=[background],
bkg_uncertainty=[bkg_uncertainty * background],
)
# Observed data (background-only for expected limit)
data = [background] + model.config.auxdata
return {"model": model, "data": data}
def compute_cls(model, data, poi_values=None):
"""
Compute CLs exclusion limits (frequentist hypothesis test).
Uses the CLs method standard in HEP.
"""
if poi_values is None:
poi_values = np.linspace(0, 5, 50)
obs_cls = []
exp_cls = []
for mu in poi_values:
result = pyhf.infer.hypotest(
mu, data, model["model"],
test_stat="qtilde",
return_expected_set=True,
)
obs_cls.append(float(result[0]))
exp_cls.append([float(v) for v in result[1]])
return {
"poi_values": poi_values.tolist(),
"observed_cls": obs_cls,
"expected_cls": exp_cls,
}
def discovery_significance(n_observed: float, n_background: float,
sigma_b: float = 0) -> dict:
"""
Compute discovery significance for a counting experiment.
n_observed: number of observed events
n_background: expected background
sigma_b: uncertainty on background
"""
from scipy.stats import norm
if sigma_b == 0:
# Simple Poisson significance
# Z = sqrt(2 * (n * ln(n/b) - (n - b)))
if n_observed <= n_background:
z = 0
else:
z = np.sqrt(2 * (
n_observed * np.log(n_observed / n_background)
- (n_observed - n_background)
))
else:
# With systematic uncertainty (profile likelihood approximation)
tau = n_background / sigma_b**2
n = n_observed
b = n_background
z = np.sqrt(2 * (
n * np.log((n * (b + tau)) / (b**2 + n * tau))
- (b**2 / tau) * np.log(1 + tau * (n - b) / (b * (b + tau)))
))
p_value = 1 - norm.cdf(z)
return {
"z_significance": round(z, 4),
"p_value": p_value,
"is_evidence": z >= 3.0, # 3 sigma = evidence
"is_discovery": z >= 5.0, # 5 sigma = discovery
}
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
def fit_breit_wigner_plus_bg(bin_centers: np.ndarray,
bin_contents: np.ndarray,
mass_range: tuple = (80, 100)) -> dict:
"""
Fit a Breit-Wigner (resonance) + polynomial background to a mass histogram.
Standard approach for Z boson mass measurement.
"""
def model(m, N_sig, M_Z, Gamma_Z, a0, a1):
# Breit-Wigner
bw = N_sig * Gamma_Z / (2 * np.pi) / (
(m - M_Z)**2 + (Gamma_Z / 2)**2
)
# Linear background
bg = a0 + a1 * (m - 91.0)
return bw + bg
mask = (bin_centers >= mass_range[0]) & (bin_centers <= mass_range[1])
x = bin_centers[mask]
y = bin_contents[mask]
p0 = [1000, 91.2, 2.5, 10, 0] # initial guess
popt, pcov = curve_fit(model, x, y, p0=p0, sigma=np.sqrt(y + 1))
perr = np.sqrt(np.diag(pcov))
return {
"M_Z": f"{popt[1]:.3f} +/- {perr[1]:.3f} GeV",
"Gamma_Z": f"{popt[2]:.3f} +/- {perr[]:f} GeV",
: ,
: (np.(((y - model(x, *popt))** / (y + ))) / ((x) - ), ),
}
1. Matrix element calculation (MadGraph, Sherpa, POWHEG)
--> Hard scattering process (e.g., pp -> Z -> mu+mu-)
2. Parton shower (Pythia, Herwig)
--> QCD radiation, initial/final state radiation
3. Hadronization (Pythia string model, Herwig cluster model)
--> Quarks/gluons -> hadrons
4. Detector simulation (Geant4 via CMSSW/Athena, or Delphes for fast sim)
--> Particle interactions with detector material
5. Reconstruction
--> Raw hits -> tracks, clusters, physics objects