用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill literature-mapping-guide命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact.
Use when a research task needs reproducible Kaggle discovery, metadata inspection, bounded public-data downloads, competition or kernel discovery, model discovery, or an explicitly approved Kaggle write/delete operation through the official CLI.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | literature-mapping-guide |
| description | Visual literature mapping and connected papers exploration |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"emoji":"🗺️","category":"literature","subcategory":"discovery","keywords":["literature map","reference graph","citation network","related papers"],"source":"wentor-research-plugins"}} |
Build visual maps of scholarly literature to understand research landscapes, identify clusters of related work, and discover hidden connections between papers.
Literature mapping transforms flat lists of papers into interactive visual networks where nodes represent papers and edges represent citation or similarity relationships. This approach helps researchers:
Connected Papers (connectedpapers.com) builds a similarity graph around a seed paper using co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis.
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Input | Paper title, DOI, or URL |
| Graph type | Similarity (not direct citation) |
| Node size | Citation count |
| Node color | Publication year (darker = older) |
| Max nodes | ~40 per graph |
| Cost | Free: 5 graphs/month; Premium: unlimited |
How to use:
Litmaps (litmaps.com) creates dynamic, multi-seed citation maps that update as new papers are published.
Workflow:
VOSviewer (vosviewer.com) is a free desktop tool for constructing and visualizing bibliometric networks at scale.
# VOSviewer supports several network types:
# - Co-authorship networks
# - Co-citation networks
# - Bibliographic coupling networks
# - Co-occurrence of keywords
# - Citation networks
# Input formats:
# - Web of Science export files
# - Scopus CSV exports
# - Dimensions export files
# - RIS files from reference managers
# - CrossRef API queries (built-in)
Steps for VOSviewer analysis:
CiteSpace (citespace.podia.com) specializes in detecting research fronts and intellectual turning points.
Key features:
import networkx as nx
import requests
from collections import defaultdict
def build_citation_graph(seed_ids, depth=1, max_per_level=20):
"""Build a directed citation graph from seed papers."""
G = nx.DiGraph()
visited = set()
queue = [(sid, 0) for sid in seed_ids]
while queue:
paper_id, level = queue.pop(0)
if paper_id in visited or level > depth:
continue
visited.add(paper_id)
# Get paper metadata
meta_resp = requests.get(
f"https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/{paper_id}",
params={"fields": "title,year,citationCount"}
)
if meta_resp.status_code != 200:
continue
meta = meta_resp.json()
G.add_node(paper_id, title=meta.get("title", ""),
year=meta.get("year"), citations=meta.get("citationCount", 0))
# Get references (backward)
refs_resp = requests.get(
f"https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/{paper_id}/references",
params={"fields": "title,year,citationCount", "limit": max_per_level}
)
if refs_resp.status_code == 200:
ref refs_resp.json().get(, []):
cited = ref[]
cited.get():
G.add_node(cited[], title=cited.get(, ),
year=cited.get(), citations=cited.get(, ))
G.add_edge(paper_id, cited[], relation=)
level < depth:
queue.append((cited[], level + ))
G
seeds = [, ]
graph = build_citation_graph(seeds, depth=, max_per_level=)
()
centrality = nx.betweenness_centrality(graph)
top_central = (centrality.items(), key= x: x[], reverse=)[:]
node_id, score top_central:
title = graph.nodes[node_id].get(, )
()
| Visual Feature | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Large cluster | Established subfield with many related papers |
| Small isolated cluster | Emerging or niche research area |
| Bridge node between clusters | Interdisciplinary or foundational paper |
| Dense interconnections | Mature area with extensive cross-referencing |
| Sparse area between clusters | Potential research gap or opportunity |
| Temporal gradient (old to new) | Evolution of ideas over time |