用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill orkg-api命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact.
Use when a research task needs reproducible Kaggle discovery, metadata inspection, bounded public-data downloads, competition or kernel discovery, model discovery, or an explicitly approved Kaggle write/delete operation through the official CLI.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | orkg-api |
| description | Query the Open Research Knowledge Graph for structured research data |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"emoji":"🕸️","category":"literature","subcategory":"metadata","keywords":["knowledge graph","research data","structured research","ORKG","research contributions","scholarly graph"],"source":"https://orkg.org/"}} |
The Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) transforms unstructured scholarly articles into structured, machine-readable research contributions. Unlike traditional databases that store metadata (title, authors, DOI), ORKG captures the semantic content — research problems, methods, results, and their relationships. The REST API enables querying, creating, and comparing research contributions programmatically. Free, no authentication required for read operations.
https://orkg.org/api/
# Search papers in ORKG
curl "https://orkg.org/api/papers?q=climate+change+adaptation&size=20"
# Get paper details by ID
curl "https://orkg.org/api/papers/R12345"
# Search any resource (papers, predicates, comparisons)
curl "https://orkg.org/api/resources?q=machine+learning&size=20"
# Filter by class
curl "https://orkg.org/api/resources?q=BERT&exact=false&classes=Paper"
ORKG's unique feature — structured side-by-side comparison of papers:
# List comparisons
curl "https://orkg.org/api/comparisons?size=10"
# Get a specific comparison
curl "https://orkg.org/api/comparisons/R54321"
# Search comparisons
curl "https://orkg.org/api/comparisons?q=sentiment+analysis"
# Get contributions of a paper
curl "https://orkg.org/api/papers/R12345/contributions"
# A contribution describes what a paper contributes:
# - Research problem addressed
# - Method used
# - Results achieved
# - Materials/datasets used
import requests
BASE_URL = "https://orkg.org/api"
def search_orkg_papers(query: str, size: int = 20) -> list:
"""Search papers in the Open Research Knowledge Graph."""
resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/papers", params={"q": query, "size": size})
resp.raise_for_status()
data = resp.json()
papers = []
for item in data.get("content", []):
papers.append({
"id": item.get("id"),
"title": item.get("title"),
"created": item.get("created_at"),
"contributions": item.get("contributions", [])
})
return papers
def get_paper_contributions(paper_id: str) -> dict:
"""Get structured research contributions for a paper."""
resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/papers/{paper_id}/contributions")
resp.raise_for_status()
return resp.json()
def search_comparisons(topic: str) -> list:
"""Find structured paper comparisons on a topic."""
resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/comparisons", params={"q": topic, "size": })
resp.raise_for_status()
resp.json().get(, [])
papers = search_orkg_papers()
p papers:
()
comparisons = search_comparisons()
c comparisons:
()
| Concept | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Paper | A scholarly article with metadata | "Attention Is All You Need" |
| Contribution | What a paper contributes to knowledge | "Proposes self-attention mechanism" |
| Research Problem | The problem a contribution addresses | "Machine translation quality" |
| Predicate | A relationship type | "has_method", "has_result", "uses_dataset" |
| Comparison | Side-by-side structured comparison | "Transformer variants comparison" |
| Resource | Any entity in the knowledge graph | A method, dataset, metric, or concept |
| Feature | Traditional (S2, Crossref) | ORKG |
|---|---|---|
| Content | Metadata (title, DOI, citations) | Semantic content (methods, results) |
| Structure | Flat records | Knowledge graph with relationships |
| Comparison | Manual (read each paper) | Automated structured comparisons |
| Machine-readable | Bibliographic metadata only | Research contributions structured |
| Coverage | Broad (200M+ papers) | Deep but narrower (~50K papers) |