来源信息
- 仓库
- brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
- 最近来源活动
- 2026年4月3日 02:07
- 检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
- 英语
- 星标
- 3,291
- 分支
- 432
安装方式
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。
检查来源文件
决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
菜单
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill data-collection-automation命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact.
Use when a research task needs reproducible Kaggle discovery, metadata inspection, bounded public-data downloads, competition or kernel discovery, model discovery, or an explicitly approved Kaggle write/delete operation through the official CLI.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | data-collection-automation |
| description | Automate survey deployment, data collection, and pipeline management |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"emoji":"🤖","category":"research","subcategory":"automation","keywords":["data collection","survey automation","pipeline","Qualtrics API","research automation","ETL"],"source":"wentor-research-plugins"}} |
A skill for automating research data collection, survey deployment, and data pipeline management. Covers survey platform APIs, automated data retrieval, quality checks, ETL pipelines, and scheduling for longitudinal studies.
import os
import json
import urllib.request
import time
def export_qualtrics_responses(survey_id: str,
file_format: str = "csv") -> str:
"""
Export survey responses from Qualtrics via API.
Args:
survey_id: The Qualtrics survey ID (SV_...)
file_format: Export format (csv, json, spss)
"""
api_token = os.environ["QUALTRICS_API_TOKEN"]
data_center = os.environ["QUALTRICS_DATACENTER"]
base_url = f"https://{data_center}.qualtrics.com/API/v3"
headers = {
"X-API-TOKEN": api_token,
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
# Step 1: Start export
export_data = json.dumps({
"format": file_format,
"compress": False
}).encode("utf-8")
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{base_url}/surveys/{survey_id}/export-responses",
data=export_data,
headers=headers
)
response = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())
progress_id = response["result"]["progressId"]
# Step 2: Poll for completion
status = "inProgress"
while status == "inProgress":
time.sleep(2)
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{base_url}/surveys/{survey_id}/export-responses/{progress_id}",
headers=headers
)
check = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())
status = check["result"]["status"]
file_id = check["result"]["fileId"]
# Step 3: Download file
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{base_url}/surveys/{survey_id}/export-responses/{file_id}/file",
headers=headers
)
file_data = urllib.request.urlopen(req).read()
output_path = f"responses_{survey_id}.{file_format}"
with open(output_path, "wb") as f:
f.write(file_data)
return output_path
def export_redcap_records(api_url: str, fields: list[str] = None) -> list:
"""
Export records from a REDCap project.
Args:
api_url: REDCap API endpoint URL
fields: List of field names to export (None = all fields)
"""
api_token = os.environ["REDCAP_API_TOKEN"]
data = {
"token": api_token,
"content": "record",
"format": "json",
"type": "flat"
}
if fields:
data["fields"] = ",".join(fields)
encoded = urllib.parse.urlencode(data).encode("utf-8")
req = urllib.request.Request(api_url, data=encoded)
response = urllib.request.urlopen(req)
return json.loads(response.read())
import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime
def validate_survey_data(df: pd.DataFrame,
rules: dict) -> dict:
"""
Run automated data quality checks on collected data.
Args:
df: DataFrame of survey responses
rules: Dict of column -> validation rule pairs
"""
issues = []
# Check for duplicates
dupes = df.duplicated(subset=["respondent_id"]).sum()
if dupes > 0:
issues.append(f"Found {dupes} duplicate respondent IDs")
# Check completion rates
completion = df.notna().mean()
low_completion = completion[completion < 0.5]
for col in low_completion.index:
issues.append(f"Column '{col}' has {low_completion[col]:.0%} completion")
# Check value ranges
for col, rule in rules.items():
if col not in df.columns:
continue
if "min" in rule:
violations = (df[col] < rule["min"]).sum()
if violations > 0:
issues.append(f"{violations} values below minimum in '{col}'")
if "max" rule:
violations = (df[col] > rule[]).()
violations > :
issues.append()
df.columns:
median_time = df[].median()
speeders = (df[] < median_time * ).()
speeders > :
issues.append()
{
: (df),
: (issues),
: issues,
: datetime.now().isoformat()
}
def research_etl_pipeline(sources: list[dict],
output_dir: str) -> dict:
"""
Extract, transform, and load research data from multiple sources.
Args:
sources: List of data source configurations
output_dir: Directory to save processed data
"""
results = {}
for source in sources:
name = source["name"]
# Extract
if source["type"] == "qualtrics":
raw_path = export_qualtrics_responses(source["survey_id"])
df = pd.read_csv(raw_path)
elif source["type"] == "redcap":
records = export_redcap_records(source["api_url"])
df = pd.DataFrame(records)
elif source["type"] == "csv_url":
df = pd.read_csv(source["url"])
else:
continue
# Transform
df = df.dropna(how="all")
df.columns = [c.strip().lower().replace(" ", "_") for c in df.columns]
# Load
timestamp = datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d")
output_path = f"{output_dir}/{name}_{timestamp}.csv"
df.to_csv(output_path, index=False)
results[name] = {
"records": len(df),
"columns": (df.columns),
: output_path
}
results
# Run data collection pipeline daily at 6 AM
# crontab -e
0 6 * * * cd /path/to/project && python collect_data.py >> logs/collection.log 2>&1
For longitudinal studies, automate monitoring of:
- Response rates per wave (alert if below threshold)
- Data quality metrics (completion, speeding, straight-lining)
- API quota usage (stay within rate limits)
- Storage usage and backup status
- Participant dropout patterns
Always ensure automated data collection complies with your IRB/ethics board approval. Store API tokens securely using environment variables, never in code. Implement data encryption at rest. Log all data access for audit trails. Respect rate limits on external APIs. Include automated checks for consent status before processing participant data.