基于 SOC 职业分类
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill kosmos-scientist-guide命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact.
Use when a research task needs reproducible Kaggle discovery, metadata inspection, bounded public-data downloads, competition or kernel discovery, model discovery, or an explicitly approved Kaggle write/delete operation through the official CLI.
| name | kosmos-scientist-guide |
| description | Claude Code-driven autonomous AI Scientist for discovery |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"emoji":"🔭","category":"research","subcategory":"deep-research","keywords":["AI Scientist","autonomous discovery","Claude Code","research automation","scientific method","experiment"],"source":"https://github.com/jimmc414/Kosmos"}} |
Kosmos is a Claude Code-driven AI Scientist framework that automates the scientific discovery process — from hypothesis generation through literature review, experiment design, code implementation, result analysis, and paper writing. It uses Claude Code as the execution engine with structured prompts that guide it through the full scientific method. Designed for ML/AI researchers automating experiment pipelines.
Research Question
↓
Literature Review (search + synthesize)
↓
Hypothesis Generation (testable predictions)
↓
Experiment Design (variables, controls, metrics)
↓
Implementation (code, data pipeline)
↓
Execution (run experiments)
↓
Analysis (statistics, visualization)
↓
Interpretation (findings, limitations)
↓
Paper Draft (LaTeX manuscript)
# CLAUDE.md for Kosmos AI Scientist
## Research Protocol
You are an AI Scientist conducting rigorous research.
Follow the scientific method strictly:
1. **Literature Review**: Search for related work before
proposing anything new. Use OpenAlex API.
2. **Hypothesis**: State falsifiable hypotheses clearly.
3. **Experiment Design**: Define independent/dependent
variables, controls, evaluation metrics.
4. **Implementation**: Write clean, reproducible code.
Set random seeds. Log all hyperparameters.
5. **Analysis**: Run statistical tests. Report confidence
intervals, not just point estimates.
6. **Honesty**: Report negative results. Acknowledge
limitations. Never fabricate data.
## Tools Available
- Python 3.11+ with PyTorch, NumPy, SciPy
- LaTeX (pdflatex + bibtex)
- OpenAlex API for literature
- W&B for experiment tracking (optional)
# Kosmos automates literature search
# The AI Scientist searches, reads, and synthesizes
# Guided prompt pattern:
"""
Search for papers on: [TOPIC]
1. Find 20+ relevant papers from last 3 years
2. Read abstracts and identify key methods
3. Create a summary table:
| Paper | Method | Dataset | Key Result |
4. Identify gaps in current research
5. Propose novel directions based on gaps
"""
# Structured experiment specification
experiment_spec = {
"hypothesis": "Sparse attention patterns learned via "
"Gumbel-Softmax outperform fixed patterns "
"on long-sequence tasks",
"independent_vars": ["attention_pattern_type"],
"dependent_vars": ["accuracy", "throughput", "memory"],
"controls": {
"model_size": "same parameter count",
"training_data": "same dataset and splits",
"hyperparams": "same learning rate schedule",
},
"datasets": ["Long Range Arena", "PG-19"],
"baselines": ["full_attention", "local_window",
"linformer", "performer"],
"metrics": {
"primary": "accuracy",
"secondary": ["wall_clock_time", "peak_memory"],
},
"statistical_tests": ["paired_t_test", "bootstrap_ci"],
"seed_runs": 5,
}
# The AI Scientist writes and runs experiment code
# Pattern: iterative implementation with testing
"""
Implement the experiment:
1. Write model code with unit tests
2. Write training loop with logging
3. Run small-scale validation (1 epoch, subset)
4. Verify metrics are computed correctly
5. Run full experiments (all seeds, all baselines)
6. Save results to results/ directory
"""
# Results structure
# results/
# ├── config.json # Full hyperparameters
# ├── metrics.csv # All run metrics
# ├── figures/ # Generated plots
# └── checkpoints/ # Model checkpoints
# Automated analysis and writing
"""
Analyze results and write paper:
1. Compute mean ± std across seeds
2. Run statistical significance tests
3. Generate publication-quality figures
4. Write LaTeX paper with:
- Introduction (motivation + contributions)
- Related Work (from literature review)
- Method (formal description)
- Experiments (setup + results + analysis)
- Conclusion (summary + limitations + future)
5. Verify all citations are real (OpenAlex/CrossRef)
"""
### Guardrails
- Never fabricate or manipulate experimental data
- Report all results including negative ones
- Acknowledge limitations explicitly
- Verify all citations against real databases
- Include compute cost and environmental impact
- Flag when results are inconclusive
- Human review required before submission