用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill latte-review-guide命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact.
Use when a research task needs reproducible Kaggle discovery, metadata inspection, bounded public-data downloads, competition or kernel discovery, model discovery, or an explicitly approved Kaggle write/delete operation through the official CLI.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | latte-review-guide |
| description | Automate systematic literature reviews with LatteReview AI agents |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"emoji":"☕","category":"research","subcategory":"paper-review","keywords":["LatteReview","systematic review","literature screening","AI review","title screening","PRISMA"],"source":"https://github.com/PouriaRouzrokh/LatteReview"}} |
LatteReview is a low-code Python package that uses AI agents to automate systematic literature reviews. It handles title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, data extraction, and PRISMA-compliant reporting — tasks that typically consume hundreds of researcher-hours. Supports multiple LLM backends (Anthropic, OpenAI, local models).
pip install lattereview
from lattereview import ReviewProject
# Create a new review project
project = ReviewProject(
name="ML in Medical Imaging Review",
research_question="What deep learning architectures are used for "
"medical image segmentation?",
inclusion_criteria=[
"Uses deep learning for medical image segmentation",
"Published in peer-reviewed venue",
"Reports quantitative evaluation metrics",
],
exclusion_criteria=[
"Review/survey articles",
"Non-English publications",
"Conference abstracts only",
],
)
# Import from various sources
project.import_papers("scopus_export.csv", source="scopus")
project.import_papers("pubmed_export.csv", source="pubmed")
# Or from a DataFrame
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv("papers.csv")
project.import_from_dataframe(df,
title_col="title",
abstract_col="abstract",
year_col="year",
)
print(f"Imported {project.total_papers} papers")
from lattereview.agents import ScreeningAgent
# Configure screening agent
screener = ScreeningAgent(
llm_provider="anthropic",
model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
criteria=project.inclusion_criteria,
exclusion=project.exclusion_criteria,
)
# Title/abstract screening
results = screener.screen(
project.papers,
mode="title_abstract",
confidence_threshold=0.7,
)
# Results include: decision, confidence, reasoning
for paper in results[:3]:
print(f"{paper.title}")
print(f" Decision: {paper.decision} "
f"(confidence: {paper.confidence:.2f})")
print(f" Reason: {paper.reasoning}")
from lattereview.agents import ExtractionAgent
extractor = ExtractionAgent(
llm_provider="anthropic",
fields={
"architecture": "Deep learning architecture used",
"dataset": "Medical imaging dataset",
"modality": "Imaging modality (CT, MRI, X-ray, etc.)",
"dice_score": "Best Dice similarity coefficient reported",
"sample_size": "Number of images/patients",
},
)
extracted = extractor.extract(project.included_papers)
# Export structured data
extracted.to_csv("extracted_data.csv")
# PRISMA flow diagram
project.generate_prisma_diagram("prisma.png")
# Summary statistics
summary = project.summarize()
print(f"Screened: {summary['screened']}")
print(f"Included: {summary['included']}")
print(f"Excluded: {summary['excluded']}")
# Use different LLM providers
screener = ScreeningAgent(
llm_provider="openai",
model="gpt-4o",
)
# Local models via Ollama
screener = ScreeningAgent(
llm_provider="ollama",
model="llama3",
base_url="http://localhost:11434",
)
# Simulate dual-reviewer screening for reliability
results = screener.dual_screen(
project.papers,
models=["claude-sonnet-4-20250514", "gpt-4o"],
agreement_threshold=0.8,
)
# Papers with disagreement flagged for human review
conflicts = [p for p in results if p.agreement < 0.8]
print(f"{len(conflicts)} papers need human adjudication")